There is evidence as rape is also seen as hiraabah as well, so the ruler can apply a more severe punishment without the need of 4 witnesses.
Otherwise, he is to be punished (i.e., if there is no proof that the hadd punishment for zina may be carried out against him because he does not confess, and there are not four witnesses, then the judge may punish him and stipulate a punishment that will deter him and others like him). There is no punishment for the woman if it is true that he forced her and overpowered her, which may be proven by her screaming and shouting for help. End quote.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/islamqa.info/amp/en/answers/72338
you should use quotation marks.
comment of Angelina (if I'm not mistaken): "There is evidence as rape is also seen as hiraabah as well, so the ruler can apply a more severe punishment without the need of 4 witnesses."
wording of fatwa:
"Otherwise, he is to be punished (i.e., if there is no proof that the hadd punishment for zina may be carried out against him because he does not confess, and there are not four witnesses, then the judge may punish him and stipulate a punishment that will deter him and others like him). There is no punishment for the woman if it is true that he forced her and overpowered her, which may be proven by her screaming and shouting for help. End quote."
now, to my understanding- the rape may involve hiraabah. for example, he kidnaps the woman or breaks into her house- then it's hiraabah and I believe he can be crucified. however, I do not think the rape in and of itself is considered as hiraabah. from what I understand, it can be considered as hiraabah under certain situations like the ones I mentioned but rape as such is not considered as hiraabah.