Don’t worry I was trolling on that one.that image makes no sense
Don’t worry I was trolling on that one.that image makes no sense
Stop dodging the question and give us a reason
Proves ethiosemtic langauges existed in Ethiopia since at least 2000bce. There’s written Ge’ez that dates back to 1000bce, imagine this is doesn’t even tell how long the transion took to becoming a localized variant of Semitics.
Stuart, Munro-Hay (1991). Aksum: An African Civilization of Late Antiquity. Edinburgh: University Press. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-7486-0106-6.
Lol, sidama were only apart of ethiopia in the last few hundred years. Bejas were conquered and it was written about. Agews are the original stalk of norther Ethiopians, yes but how can you mix with your own self?
Why do I need to answer it for the 439th time?Stop dodging the question and give us a reason
You Ethiopians are clearly obsessed with us
You have dozens of Ethiopian forums, go post there
True, but my point is that ethiosemtic languages are found no where else. Thus making their origin solely in Ethiopia. If there’s written Ethiopic languages dating to 1000bce which shows signs of maturity, meaning that they are not new and thus went through extensive development can only mean that they are of antiquity.Having a presence doesn't mean anything. There are south Arabian inscriptions all over Northern Somalia. Does that mean Somalia was part of Axum or that there were a large population of semites kind Somalia? No. Trade existed and so did communication. That doesn't mean that there was a major presence.
As for Sidaamo, seeing as their language is closest to the ancient Kerma/Kushites in Sudan, I very much doubt they are new to the area.
Because you are a Ethiopian on a Somali forum what do you expect?Why do I need to answer it for the 439th time?
They are all mixed, if you are saying there are a number that came from Yemen and have never mixed for however many number of years then that is false. Hence why an Amhara is an Amhara now, found in their region.
True, but my point is that ethiosemtic languages are found no where else. Thus making their origin solely in Ethiopia. If there’s written Ethiopic languages dating to 1000bce which shows signs of maturity, meaning that they are not new and thus went through extensive development can only mean that they are of antiquity.
I didn’t say sidama were new to the region; I just meant that they were not apart of ethiopia proper until recently, meaning there was little to no mixing.
You can’t dispute (yet) where Semitic langauges came from. My point is that there was never a large population of ME people who setttled in Ethiopia forming habeshas as it was once claimed, as it has been disproven numerous of times.Lol you sound like those butt-hurt North indians that don't believe in the Indo-Aryan invasion theory.
I know, I'm trying to say that too, but descendants from the mixtures obviously mixed with Cushitic people too, otherwise it wouldn't be possible to go beyond one generation.I know they all mixed. I'm saying the number of those that descend from the mixture is much smaller than Cushitic people that have been habeshized. E.g. for every descendant of the mixture you get like 10 Cushites that have just been habeshized.
I know, I'm trying to say that too, but descendants from the mixtures obviously mixed with Cushitic people too, otherwise it wouldn't be possible to go beyond one generation.
They stole the Somali wedding/Eid rice from Somalis too. I went to an Ayrab wedding this year and it was among the dishes that were served.
Hey leave my boy alone, he proved himself 1000 times months agoStop dodging the question and give us a reason
You Ethiopians are clearly obsessed with us
You have dozens of Ethiopian forums, go post there
Jodeci i dont know about maandi laakin
Hey leave my boy alone, he proved himself 1000 times months ago
He's not an Ethiopian troll or a hater
What did he say? This thread has too many pages for me to scroll through.f*ck that ethiopian and his raw meat he tried to lie on somalis in this thread and we ran him out
You can’t dispute (yet) where Semitic langauges came from. My point is that there was never a large population of ME people who setttled in Ethiopia forming habeshas as it was once claimed, as it has been disproven numerous of times.
What did he say? This thread has too many pages for me to scroll through.