The Greatest General In The Last 2500 Years History

DR OSMAN

AF NAAREED
VIP
I know their alot of unwritten ones in that period and in oral histories and then there is older period before Greek inspired world today. As for Torah mentions most warrior class from our region like Phut, Cush, Mizraim, etc no real mention of Europe but some for Cyrus in Persia.

But let's just keep it simple out of the known ones who do U select and your reasoning? For me it's Genghis Khan. Would sleep years watching him. The reason is the land holdings he left behind for Mongolia, Siberia, Plus big chunk of China and their only 3 to 5 million max, the reason I don't say Alexander rumours are he got defeated by a Nubian Queen Candace. he couldn't get in any further.

Plus Greek land holdings are tiny islands even if you add Macedonia, he fought hard but couldn't hold it like Genghis and his successors. ๐Ÿ˜‚

You simply nothing no offence if your living in tight land, density like rats a congregation of the weak, while those guys live like lions not talk like one. I'm old school on that stuff love it lump it. I mean anyone who overlooks Genghis better justify it, based on pound for pound plus that land holdings that's some brutal warrior class. They hold land that more then Billion rats live in combined.
 
Last edited:

DR OSMAN

AF NAAREED
VIP
Somalis r confused about Russia their land isn't no bigger then England yet their 100 million who talk big only unless U add Belarus, Kievan Rus then that's different story but for their population vs land size their not great pound for pound, but the rest of Russia is Mongolian land, plus they got their own Mongolia which is a motherfucker huge land, don't forget their autonomous region in China which isn't anything to scoff at either. Their really done an injustice I think because U can't be that small of a group and hold such land if your ancestors were not warriors ๐Ÿค”

Only people who fight anyways in real cultural level mindset is ppl who live in desers, mountains, arctic areas and cultured around it for thousands of years, it's genetic for them, while others in more hospitable environments are taught it and doesn't come natural, U can't have someone cultured n conditioned in harsh land plus given knowledge on top of it, it's quite a volatile mix, some balance is needed.
 

DR OSMAN

AF NAAREED
VIP
Genghis Khan was said to have greatest general under him


Dude forget how big the empire was which it was and is another story and requires more attention, but just the land holdings of Mongols today(ancestoraI hand down) includes most of Russia, big chunk of China, plus Mongolia which is huge and that speaks volumes especially when you account for their population size.
 

The truth seeker

Get Rich or Die Tryin'
Erwin Romell โ€œdesert foxโ€ the nazi general who conquered North Africa and disobeyed ordered from hitler on occasion . He was praised in the book the art of winning wars written in 1968

Douglas McArthur is the most underrated western general of the last century his campaign in the Philippines and the South Pacific was legendary
 
Erwin Romell โ€œdesert foxโ€ the nazi general who conquered North Africa and disobeyed ordered from hitler on occasion . He was praised in the book the art of winning wars written in 1968

Douglas McArthur is the most underrated western general of the last century his campaign in the Philippines and the South Pacific was legendary
Rommel is overhyped due to Nazi propaganda and media. Manstein is generally considered their greatest field Marshall. @DR OSMAN I think youโ€™ll like Von Manstein a lot. Heโ€™s brilliant.
 
To me the greatest is Hannibal because he fought very well for two decades in his enemies lands. He included various people speaking different languages into his army and killed hundreds of thousands of Roman soldiers. He would have destroyed Rome had he actually decided to take it but I think the Carthaginian aristocrats got in his way and stopped him. The Romans even built statues of him. When he was eventually defeated he went to Turkey and the Romans were so scared of him they sent soldiers to kill him as an old man.
 

DR OSMAN

AF NAAREED
VIP
Africa needs to secure it's continent and see the trend thru out history being pushed out of the early Levant and eventually North Africa well they didn't really lose North Africa DNA wise but culture wise and even then it's very small strip in North Africa not the whole lot as the Sahel owns most of it.

South Africa nearly fell but they re took it politically not sure evictions are warranted their not growing like rats but resemble what the Greeks n Romans tried in ancient Egypt and succeeded with Christianity Coptic church and Islam thru the arabs, Zimbabwe cleaned up house tho, I kinda agree land rights come first not economic, as land is the most valuable asset when U see the amount of sea water ratio.

It's time Africa begin joining some alliance like BRICS or Islamist only in return for land grabs in Europe. Forget the South America or North America noone really bothered with those continents in true history prior to europeans when I looked into it but they knew it, they set up the pyramids for them there .

Hip Hop Reaction GIF


Somalia however should adopt neutral stance and watch them venture out in franchises this time, we learned our lesson in joining franchises in the cold war.
 
Last edited:

DR OSMAN

AF NAAREED
VIP
It's all just a bloody coincidence that E1B1B Marker is located in any early civilization area in southern Europe or the Levant, North Africa and horn and Arabia, mmmmmm but their is no commonality who founded it tho, if it was any other DNA group U wouldn't hear the end of it.

Oh love this one the most, the pyramid developed independently globally and wasn't Kush or ancient Egypt cultural marker oh no no no no their is no common origin here but everything else has common origins ๐Ÿ˜‚
 
I'll definitely being reading n watching up on him also. Didn't know this and won't do it injustice thru ignorance.
Thereโ€™s awesome podcast called hardcore history with Dan Carlin and he did 5 part series on the mongol invasion of Eurasia and China.its called wrath of the khans
 
From my readings, and I have got keen interest in war strategies, here is how I would summarise it:

Notable Generals:
Of all time in a class of his own:
  • Marcus Aurelius: The great Roman emperor, philosopher, and conqueror of most of Europe,
  • Sultan Sulaiman the Magnificent (Othoman): Conqueror of Europe and most of Euro Asia, a master tactician, and one of the first to have exploited the supply chain doctrine in war fare (later trade routes). One of a few, who dared wage wars at four enemy fronts at the same time. Of course he benefited a great deal from earlier conquests by Mohammed II, who almost sacked Rome (had it not been for his sudden death, European history would have been shaped differently; death stares at us all.
  • Salah al Din al Ayoub: A great strategist, and theorist, who liquidated the Crusaders.

Next:
  • Napoleon: The de facto war strategist emulated by all other European General, and [the] general of Europe ( well that was till piles got the better of him and he became restless),
  • M Zedong (father of modern China): Clever, visionary leader, if ruthless tactician,
  • Mohamed A Pasha (father of modern Egypt): The Albanian warrior and adventurer, who conquered Egypt, north Africa, Hijaz all the way to the Levant, having defeated Napoleon's army.

And from a European perspective, esp. Europe's 2nd war:
  • B Montegomery: Methodical tactician,
  • D Eisenhower: War planning, and coalition building,
  • G Zhukocv: Ruthless tactician, best at troops' engagement,
  • H Gudarian: Battle technician, war theorist,
  • E von Manstein: Strategic brilliance,
  • E Romel: Troops movement,

And the worse:
- D McArthur, S Prasca, and almost all French generals notably M Gamelin, P Petain, and the list goes on.
 
From my readings, and I have got keen interest in war strategies, here is how I would summarise it:

Notable Generals:
Of all time in a class of his own:
  • Marcus Aurelius: The great Roman emperor, philosopher, and conqueror of most of Europe,
  • Sultan Sulaiman the Magnificent (Othoman): Conqueror of Europe and most of Euro Asia, a master tactician, and one of the first to have exploited the supply chain doctrine in war fare (later trade routes). One of a few, who dared wage wars at four enemy fronts at the same time. Of course he benefited a great deal from earlier conquests by Mohammed II, who almost sacked Rome (had it not been for his sudden death, European history would have been shaped differently; death stares at us all.
  • Salah al Din al Ayoub: A great strategist, and theorist, who liquidated the Crusaders.

Next:
  • Napoleon: The de facto war strategist emulated by all other European General, and [the] general of Europe ( well that was till piles got the better of him and he became restless),
  • M Zedong (father of modern China): Clever, visionary leader, if ruthless tactician,
  • Mohamed A Pasha (father of modern Egypt): The Albanian warrior and adventurer, who conquered Egypt, north Africa, Hijaz all the way to the Levant, having defeated Napoleon's army.

And from a European perspective, esp. Europe's 2nd war:
  • B Montegomery: Methodical tactician,
  • D Eisenhower: War planning, and coalition building,
  • G Zhukocv: Ruthless tactician, best at troops' engagement,
  • H Gudarian: Battle technician, war theorist,
  • E von Manstein: Strategic brilliance,
  • E Romel: Troops movement,

And the worse:
- D McArthur, S Prasca, and almost all French generals notably M Gamelin, P Petain, and the list goes on.
might need a reading list
 

DR OSMAN

AF NAAREED
VIP
Rommel is overhyped due to Nazi propaganda and media. Manstein is generally considered their greatest field Marshall. @DR OSMAN I think youโ€™ll like Von Manstein a lot. Heโ€™s brilliant.

Ottomans And Germans seem to be the best in Europe when their in war mode. Erdogan knows this comparative edge and switched turks out of middle power status assigned to them by west thru ata turk.

Germany who knows but it's quietly rising among their ppl to use their edge(far right growing).

The whole western bloc had to gang up on them and then poison them with democracy and assign them to middle power status ๐Ÿ˜†

If Ottomans And Germans and Russia had a pact with Brics because it is Anglo club and they know it ๐Ÿ˜†

I'd just find Napoleon and Hitler maker dna wise E1b1b in Germans as it matches their generals. Even jews ashkenazi their like 30% I'd be careful around those ones but not the rest. That DNA has thinking style that's all it means and u will know when u hear it cause it's not theatrics and outcome focused not method focused.

Their something wrong with feudalism when ppl r assigned occupations and form cultures and structure around it, the mind becomes closed and no longer free unlike the great periods of Asia and Europe like genghis or vikings didn't have this set up. They really don't think for themselves and always consult some expert or some heirachy u will see that marker in feudalism. That expert or heirachy was influenced by some jew in academic thought it's a self imposed prison on their part.
 
Last edited:

DR OSMAN

AF NAAREED
VIP
I don't hate jews I just hate idolatry even secular or mental enslavement of any kind, it just happens jews do it the best but that doesn't mean others don't it's just not as potent.

Ok look a free mind will say what does Jerusalem signify or stand for and they will say oh it's peace rite i mean look at the Salem part? He will look and see no peace there for 3000 years and assume it's a fraud and begin plotting.
 

DR OSMAN

AF NAAREED
VIP
We got separate relationship with God no hell or any of that, that's their relationship those mid east n Greeks n not sure of jews I didn't ask them but their book is trying to enter our relationship Taw Rah but their not allowed in. Now their is hajar issue with the arabs tho they don't understand real arabic anyways not early desert period and gabay dimension but institutional period. Now early hebrew and Judaism I haven't read yet but I don't go near the institutional shit that's for separate ppl. Even these jewish women r not circumized showing how their half human really is what old world mindset think.
 
Last edited:

Libaax-Joore

Beesha haplogroup e-by8081
VIP
According to most historical accounts, Napoleon Bonaparte is widely considered the greatest general of all time, renowned for his exceptional strategic brilliance, innovative tactics, and ability to inspire his troops, leading to significant military victories across Europe during his reign as Emperor of France
IMG_8471.jpeg
 
According to most historical accounts, Napoleon Bonaparte is widely considered the greatest general of all time, renowned for his exceptional strategic brilliance, innovative tactics, and ability to inspire his troops, leading to significant military victories across Europe during his reign as Emperor of France
View attachment 353102
Iโ€™m surprised you didnโ€™t say General Mohamed Said Hersi ๐Ÿ˜‚
 

Trending

Top