The pagan origins of Christianity

[The_Cosmos]

This is the true bible Gospel of Barnabas (google it)
http://www.sunnyskyz.com/good-news/...Is-Stirring-Up-Controversy-About-Christianity

Gospel of Barnabas has NOT been authenticated to be true and is believed to be most likely a fabrication. It's believed to have originated in the 1600s.

None of the sites you've picked out are authentic sites.

 

[Canuck]

Gospel of Barnabas has NOT been authenticated to be true and is believed to be most likely a fabrication. It's believed to have originated in the 1600s.

None of the sites you've picked out are authentic sites.

The 4 versions of bible are not inspired by god but written by man.
http://hwarmstrong.com/who-wrote-bible.htm

 

[The_Cosmos]

The 4 versions of bible are not inspired by god but written by man.
http://hwarmstrong.com/who-wrote-bible.htm

I agree but I find it hypocritical because I believe that every religious book is man made. Even the Quran is man made.

You haven't answered my point on the gospel of Barnabas. The book is a fabrication that was is dated to between 14th and 16th century.

Also, stop using bullshit sites. Provide academic sites with credibility.

 

[Canuck]

I agree but I find it hypocritical because I believe that every religious book is man made. Even the Quran is man made.

You haven't answered my point on the gospel of Barnabas. The book is a fabrication that was is dated to between 14th and 16th century.

Also, stop using bullshit sites. Provide academic sites with credibility.

Credibility in Christianity you must be kidding!!!!!

 

[The_Cosmos]

Credibility in Christianity you must be kidding!!!!!

Ok, now you're acting dense. I asked for credible sites preferably academic.

 

[Muhajaba]

Christianity is the real deal, I can easily dig up Islam's borrowed pagan rituals. The crescent is even an old turkic pagan symbol yet now everyone think it's an Islamic symbol.


Also this
View attachment 7738

The star and Crecent is a pagan symbol but the Crecent moon on its own signifies the lunar calendar used in Islam.
I'd be intrigued to know which other 'pagan' symbols and rituals is apparent in Islam. Also, since we believe Islam was the first religion on earth bought by Adam (as), what's to say paganism isn't just an extreme deviation from the truth, and still hold some of the same traditions?

 

[The_Cosmos]

The star and Crecent is a pagan symbol but the Crecent moon on its own signifies the lunar calendar used in Islam.
I'd be intrigued to know which other 'pagan' symbols and rituals is apparent in Islam. Also, since we believe Islam was the first religion on earth bought by Adam (as), what's to say paganism isn't just an extreme deviation from the truth, and still hold some of the same traditions?

Unless you can prove Islam is the first religion, your claims will be dismissed. You cannot islamasize history and claim it to be the "truth." Islam was founded 1,400 years ago.

Check me early comments where I point out the pagan rituals in Islam.

 

[Muhajaba]

Unless you can prove Islam is the first religion, your claims will be dismissed. You cannot islamasize history and claim it to be the "truth." Islam was founded 1,400 years ago.

Check me early comments where I point out the pagan rituals in Islam.

The first man was a Muslim and he came with submission (Islam) and Monotheism (tawheed).
the evidence is in the qur'an and I really don't give a shit whether you accept it or not.

 

[The_Cosmos]

The first man was a Muslim and he came with submission (Islam) and Monotheism (tawheed).
the evidence is in the qur'an and I really don't give a shit whether you accept it or not.

The Quran is the source being questioned and thus it is ludicrously insane to use it as evidence. There is no evidence that a "first man" has ever existed. In fact, it contradicts the scientific evidence which states that we are the product of a process of evolution by natural selection.

 

[Canuck]

Plz this thread about pagan roots of Christianity not about Islam make your own threads and don't derail it

 

[Muhajaba]

The Quran is the source being questioned and thus it is ludicrously insane to use it as evidence. There is no evidence that a "first man" has ever existed. In fact, it contradicts the scientific evidence which states that we are the product of a process of evolution by natural selection.

OK monkey boy.

http://cloud.tapatalk.com/s/580517a221fef/200_d.gif

 

[The_Cosmos]

OK monkey boy.

http://cloud.tapatalk.com/s/580517a221fef/200_d.gif

I'd prefer being called an Ape considering humans are one.