buddhists are not the pacifists they are shown to be in the media.
kkkk little john here still has alittle bit of dignity
This.
They should watch out for radicalism, which is what tends to happen to these types of groups though. I wouldn't be surprised if they radicalized tbh.
The teachings of Buddha were centred around pacifism though.
Well, I care more for humanity far more than you do mate. Nonetheless, if you get striked you should have the right to strike back.
yeah and many teachings have been routinely butchered for political and religious gain
because the violence isn't widespread like extremist islam and they don't have periods of crusades and religious conquests like christianity most people just don't look deeper at what buddhists have done. they're pretty consistent perpetrators of minority violence on religious and even ethnic groups that do not follow their teachings.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_violence
Waar kuwani wa neef ! Why do you care ? How come you didn't care when a genocide occurred and these same Western countries looked the otherway. Is the Western life more worthy then the life of others ? Were they in their mother's stomach for 12 months or somethings ?
The most ironic thing about this though is the fact that the Rohynga are literally jamming themselves in boats to flee to Indonesia and Malaysia and they get turned back. I mean, you'd expect the Muslims to sympathise but the only people shedding light are kuffar human rights organisations.
Insurgents being radicalized in Muslim countries is a running theme, including in Somalia! It's not out of hand to be worried about that. And I care, that's why I support their defense of themselves at this point in time.
It's very typical of you to complain about the lack of Western intervention. I almost guarantee were they involved, you wouldve complained about the opposite.
We can't agree on that. If u don't see why, I can't help u.What do you mean by radicalised? I think they have the right to be radicalised since they are being massacred.
Why is that an issue? They shouldn't have to be massacred in their land in the first place
Chechens, Bosnians didn't become radicalized neither did Uyghur Turks. They fought and still fight against religious persecution by the non Muslim majority just like the Burmese Muslims.
I'm positive no such thing as Islamic state of Al Myanmari Caliphate will come from this. No need to be paranoid
We can't agree on that. If u don't see why, I can't help u.
Two terrorist organisations immediately spring to mind the East Turkistan Islamist movement and the Caucasus Emirate.
There is unfortunately a strong preponderance to Salafist Jihadism with these Muslim insurgencies.
Let's just hope this guerilla group remains committed to protecting the persecuted Rohingya.
Sad to see Somali atheist agreeing with the massacre of Muslims. Times like this I question my acceptance of Somali atheists
Time to start treating you like the Buddhists are treating the Muslim minorityWho even said such a thing
"The Buddhist majority is committing vigilante crimes an insurgency/protection unit is therefore justified" that's what most of the known Atheists on here have been saying.
Why should we by default gain acceptance from you horta?
that's what I am wondering.What do you mean by radicalised