Theory on origin of modern races amd e1b1?

[Midas]

I found this Twitter thread and I dint have the genetic chops to evaluate it what do you guys think ? @The alchemist

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Of all the “unspeakable” ancient DNA findings, Africa is the most<br><br>If we look at the Last Glacial Maximum map, it’s obvious where the “West Eurasian” refuge would be. Now there’s a chance of an Ethiopian refuge too<br><br>So let’s think on that one <a href="https://t.co/Aotn9WIvFr">https://t.co/Aotn9WIvFr</a> <a href="https://t.co/dSYpzbwzwS">pic.twitter.com/dSYpzbwzwS</a></p>&mdash; Meme Gene (@ofreacharound) <a href="">October 16, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Juke]

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[The alchemist]

E is entirely an Ancient North African lineage with its segmentations not specially associated with any Eurasian/African drifted arrangement, to align it with a non-African development with its autosomal picture of its extent is unfounded.

Last Glacial Maximum period Southwest Asian ancestral lineages, represented by U and M mtDNA clades, did migrate into northeast Africa around ~23,000 years ago, forming the bulk of (then) non-regional ancestry of Taforalt, and peoples that lived in the eastern saharan reach which includes our ancestry. That ancestry mixed with those E-carrying Ancient North African derived lineages, a group cluster uniquely North-and-Saharan African with distinct ancestry placement.

I want to point out the error in questioning the Omotic branch as questionable placement within the Afro-Asiatic language family. Consensus born out of the majority of established linguists confidently asserts that Omotic is the oldest group, accounting rationally for why the within-complexity of drifted innovation makes it statistically harder to analyze because of its sheer age-depth. No matter, Aarioid, the specific sub-group of Omotic languages historically put under scrutiny, that I have to mention the writer of the thread falsely calls "Cushitic" speakers, are Afro-Asiatic.

Another incorrect statement the individual made was to say that Chabou was largely Nilo-Saharan in their genetic makeup. If the person bothered to read the results that came out in the last few years he would have known Chabu was a bottlenecked, drifted group through pressures of environmental niche economic subsistence, characterized by a reduction in effective population size as a result of undergoing isolation, yet still owed the majority of their ancestry to a Mota-like variation in a diverged parallel trajectory. Their language is an isolate with extraneous influence from Nilo-Saharan adjacent languages for practical utility.