Tried Something

Felt the need to randomly write something. I don't write ever, by the way, nor do I read this type of literature:

This physical reality is made up of billions of tiny pieces and yet is arranged into wholes, is what he thinks to himself, looking into his fiancée's beautiful, hopeful, smiling face. “Does she know I’m pieces moving in tandem?” He lightly smiles mournfully. Diana sees him as more than he is, a complete man that got things figured out. That optimistic reflection is what holds him together. What she sees through her eyes. The discrepancy of the two, both the figment of her love and his broken reality reminds Victor of the duality of life. Is he a fraud, a disintegrated person, or are both true? Celestial bodies move majestically in predictable forms, disciplined, prisintely. They are made up of sub-atomic particles that conform to no pattern. “Stochasticity” is what he thought. The whimsical way she entered his life with rays of passion, dichotomous from what he had lived before she randomly entered. “Nothing is ever random,” he thought.

Turning her head slightly, trying to meet his eyes desperately, indicating she sees him, or wants to, or thinks so, she says, “What are you thinking about?”

“Nothing. Only how beautiful you are.”

The End.
 

Taintedlove

Shaqo la'an ba kuu heysaata
No, no. I'm not going to read that. I just doubt I'm writing what some random cadaan person wrote somewhere else. I'm protecting my IP, is all.:lolbron:
The words and story you wrote seems unique (but the man day dreaming about philosophy and then saying something romantic to the woman watching is actually a more common theme than you'd think)

The structure of your story is what I find similar, not exact content itself.
 
The words and story you wrote seems unique (but the man day dreaming about philosophy and then saying something romantic to the woman watching is actually a more common theme than you'd think)

The structure of your story is what I find similar, not exact content itself.
Beyond the general use of the English language and dialogue setting (as that is already a combinationally narrow), I don't see how my writing is similar to other literary texts beyond what is provincially found between two random books on a library shelf. It does not fail what people in the scientific world call the null hypothesis.

It's like saying a Chinese looks similar to a Somali because they generally have four limbs, are bipedal, have a head, etc., when what you are implying is a stronger connection (otherwise there is no point in bringing it up). They share human characteristics, but nothing special beyond that. That is why pointing out the similarities is moot in all things relative, unless you're making a case that all writings have similarities, which is objectively true but really lacks focus and meaning beyond linguistic science that delves into the structural network relations of language and its use. And frankly, I did not create this thread to engage in that sort of literary nonsense, since I don't read it. I'm sure you can find others who want to engage in Harry Potter with you somewhere else, though.
 

cunug3aad

3rdchild · suugo dottore
Beyond the general use of the English language and dialogue setting (as that is already a combinationally narrow), I don't see how my writing is similar to other literary texts beyond what is provincially found between two random books on a library shelf. It does not fail what people in the scientific world call the null hypothesis.

It's like saying a Chinese looks similar to a Somali because they generally have four limbs, are bipedal, have a head, etc., when what you are implying is a stronger connection (otherwise there is no point in bringing it up). They share human characteristics, but nothing special beyond that. That is why pointing out the similarities is moot in all things relative, unless you're making a case that all writings have similarities, which is objectively true but really lacks focus and meaning beyond linguistic science that delves into the structural network relations of language and its use. And frankly, I did not create this thread to engage in that sort of literary nonsense, since I don't read it. I'm sure you can find others who want to engage in Harry Potter with you somewhere else, though.
😭She thought she found a talking buddy
 

cunug3aad

3rdchild · suugo dottore
Be her talking buddy, sxb.;)
Na bro i dont even watch movies let alone read fiction books, Last time i read a book voluntarily was like primary school maybe, even then i did the bare minimum Heres a funny story
In my school they would give like these bands for reading a certain number of pages, red for 10, purple for 20 and so on. Most of my class were on like the middle range with light blue and silver and stuff, the max was gold 2000, I think i only ever got to purple i just stole the gold one under my teacher's chair :russ: Brudda i been being illiterate
 
Na bro i dont even watch movies let alone read fiction books, Last time i read a book voluntarily was likeI primary school maybe, even then i did the bare minimum Heres a funny story
In my school they would give like these bands for reading a certain number of pages, red for 10, purple for 20 and so on. Most of my class were on like the middle range with light blue and silver and stuff, the max was gold 2000, I think i only ever got to purple i just stole the gold one under my teacher's chair :russ: Brudda i been being illiterate
I was illiterate until the last days of middle school, when I did surprisingly well on a biology exam. I unlocked my mental capabilities after that. Before that, I was street-smart, had fun, had trauma, had a nice social life, and just breezed through things in a volatile style.

I only became school smart in high school; I unlocked my brain or matured in other ways.
 

Taintedlove

Shaqo la'an ba kuu heysaata
Beyond the general use of the English language and dialogue setting (as that is already a combinationally narrow), I don't see how my writing is similar to other literary texts beyond what is provincially found between two random books on a library shelf. It does not fail what people in the scientific world call the null hypothesis.

It's like saying a Chinese looks similar to a Somali because they generally have four limbs, are bipedal, have a head, etc., when what you are implying is a stronger connection (otherwise there is no point in bringing it up). They share human characteristics, but nothing special beyond that. That is why pointing out the similarities is moot in all things relative, unless you're making a case that all writings have similarities, which is objectively true but really lacks focus and meaning beyond linguistic science that delves into the structural network relations of language and its use. And frankly, I did not create this thread to engage in that sort of literary nonsense, since I don't read it. I'm sure you can find others who want to engage in Harry Potter with you somewhere else, though.
That's not what I said. I don't actually want to discuss literature with you. Just that the themes and structure of your writing is common in literature. But it's hard to explain to someone both uninterested and not well versed in the topic.
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top