True or False: Somalia would fare better under Al Shabaab

[Abu Musab]

I stumbled upon this post on a certain website and I agreed with all the points. Does everyone share a similar opinion on this issue?

somalia under al shabaab rule had many benefits that the current govt cannot fulfill. even though icu era was much better, al shabaab's rule was decent. inshallah more corrupt mp's will be taken care of by xarakat shabaab al mujaahidiin. walaaga soo mantajin doona hantida dadweynaha soomaaliyeed.

1. somalia was ruled under the Law of Allah
2. under al shabaab, qabyaalad was at an all-time low since kacaan era
3. because of the lack of tribal wars under al-shabaab, areas under their rule were stable
4. they didn't bring fufus to the country
5. they are the only group fighting against fufu neo-colonizers, uganda, kenya, ethiopia, and co.
6. business was fair
7. somali women weren't exposed to abuse by fufu soldiers
8. al-shabaab wasn't used to fight for the interests of a clan such as the somali national army/didn't take sides during clan wars but mediated them
9. al-shabaab fighters don't rape scores of somali women, even in idps, like somali national army soldiers
10. everyone was equal before the law so justice was ensured

 

[dhegdheer]

No thank you

 

[Prince of Lasanod]

 

[Bahal]

Yeah, except for the you know, beheadings, stonings, suicide bombings etc. etc.

Somalia is not an open air laboratory for grotesque Arab ideologies

 

[Abu Musab]

No thank you

Please, explain your reasoning so we can have a cohesive dialogue in this thread. Jazakallah.

Yeah, except for the you know, beheadings, stonings, suicide bombings etc. etc.

Somalia is not an open air laboratory for grotesque Arab ideologies

The only alternative I can think of is Somali women being preyed upon and raped by Somali "government" soldiers in IDP camps, Somali politicians stealing aid meant for poor Somali citizens, Somalia's natural resources being plundered and sold to foreigners, Somali women being shipped en masse to work as maids in countries where they face abuse and humiliation, perpetual clan violence, extortion, khat addiction, social corruption and degeneracy, etc.

Whereas in the case of Al Shabaab, its "abuses" are primarily based on speculation and propaganda and not factual evidence.

 

[Lucifer]

Hope the alphabet boys are watching this thread effin idiot

 

[TheSayid]

shabaab doesn't have a problem with fufus, their army is filled with them.

 

[Bahal]

Look at this cuck, Abu Musab kulahaa.

Maxaa uu diiday a somali name???

 

[bluebird]

what? somalia was never under shabab rule

 

[Mike Hunt]

Al Shabaab leaders are businessmen using the guise of religion to make money, they know aside from qabil and money the only other thing Somali's will die for is the deen.

They profit from seeing Somali youth kill themselves, so no Somalia would not fare better with them in power imo.

 

[dhegdheer]

Please, explain your reasoning so we can have a cohesive dialogue in this thread. Jazakallah.

Look at the way Al Shabab operate in Somalia, do you honestly want them controlling the government?

I don't agree with sharia law, it's no way to run a country

 

[bluebird]

besides knowing somali people even al shabaab would start having clan wars under the guise of sectarian conflict

 

[Abu Musab]

Look at the way Al Shabab operate in Somalia, do you honestly want them controlling the government?

I don't agree with sharia law, it's no way to run a country

But, by your own admission, you're an apostate so your input is not to be taken into consideration. Wal iyadu billah..

 

[McLovin]

No thank you. I like my sambusas unfatwad and my right to live as an atheist unmitigated

 

[Abu Musab]

what? somalia was never under shabab rule

Prior to 2011, the vast majority of Somalia as we know it was controlled by Al Shabaab. They still control most of the southern and central parts of the country.

 

[dhegdheer]

But, by your own admission, you're an apostate so your input is not to be taken into consideration. Wal iyadu billah..

So my input isn't to be taken into account now hm? You asked for a reason and I gave you one, not my fault you didn't like the answer.

 

[Prince of Lasanod]

Who was the second person to vote "yes" ???

Own up now!!!

 

[bluebird]

Prior to 2011, the vast majority of Somalia as we know it was controlled by Al Shabaab. They still control most of the southern and central parts of the country.

de facto. and even so no one liked living under them then, what would change now? if shabaab wanted to win the hearts of somali people they could have done it during that time, but instead they were just playing game of cat and mouse with amisom and blowing things up

 

[McLovin]

So my input isn't to be taken into account now hm? You asked for a reason and I gave you one, not my fault you didn't like the answer.

Apparently our somalinimo is merely an extension of Islam. Kkkk like we didn't exist prior

 

[mhfrx]

I stumbled upon this post on a certain website and I agreed with all the points. Does everyone share a similar opinion on this issue?

somalia under al shabaab rule had many benefits that the current govt cannot fulfill. even though icu era was much better, al shabaab's rule was decent. inshallah more corrupt mp's will be taken care of by xarakat shabaab al mujaahidiin. walaaga soo mantajin doona hantida dadweynaha soomaaliyeed.

1. somalia was ruled under the Law of Allah
2. under al shabaab, qabyaalad was at an all-time low since kacaan era
3. because of the lack of tribal wars under al-shabaab, areas under their rule were stable
4. they didn't bring fufus to the country
5. they are the only group fighting against fufu neo-colonizers, uganda, kenya, ethiopia, and co.
6. business was fair
7. somali women weren't exposed to abuse by fufu soldiers
8. al-shabaab wasn't used to fight for the interests of a clan such as the somali national army/didn't take sides during clan wars but mediated them
9. al-shabaab fighters don't rape scores of somali women, even in idps, like somali national army soldiers
10. everyone was equal before the law so justice was ensured

Unfortunately you cant force people to live a certain way peoples interest varies greatly