What? What realm?You'll serve the realm or you'll be put on a partially inflated dinky back to the Motherland.
What? What realm?You'll serve the realm or you'll be put on a partially inflated dinky back to the Motherland.
What? What realm?
You know this is the thing that seems so funny to me. The Nazis as I understand it were white nationalists built around this cult of "Aryanism" and wanted to reverse Western decline, to achieve some of greatness for European civilization... and then it seems the main thing they accomplished was killing millions and millions of "Aryans" and getting these "Aryans" to slaughter each other other on a mass scale.
Then again, I think it's kind of a pattern with super fanatical nationalist groups for some reason. I read some Sendero Luminoso propaganda from Perú and they were espousing this fanatical Peruvian nationalism but then meanwhile their actual "accomplishments" were basically just killing a bunch of Peruvians.
I wear my poppy in remembrance of the brave, fallen Nazis who fought valiantly to bankrupt Europe so that they couldn't afford to continue occupying their colonies anymore.
You two are probably daacuun-ridden Ogadens init Anyways may Allah bless the RAF fighter pilots who bombarded Mad Mo and his band of camel raiding thugs
I've been saying this for long. The mad mullah frequently attacked and stole Somali stock and killed them.Same thing with those fanatical about the Mad Mullah.
Dervish’s proclaimed goal was to free Somali territory and Somali people from foreign occupation. They ended up fighting mostly Somalis and accomplished nothing but misery and mass murder against Somalis, culminating in the death of 1/3 of the northern Somali population. The colonisers continued to rule the land until they willingly left in 1960.
And yet you have Somali nationalists supporting thrm.
Basically, The remembrance poppy is an artificial pin on flower that has been used to commemorate military personnel that died in the wars (Specifically the Great War (WW1) )What is a remembrance poppy? Am I the only who doesn’t know what it is
No chance dawg. My great-grandfather served in the SCC during WWII but I'll never wear a poppy voluntarily. f*ck the british. Any reer somaliland, who bootyclaps for the british are a smudge on our name.It depends if their families fought in the world wares
Same thing with those fanatical about the Mad Mullah.
Dervish’s proclaimed goal was to free Somali territory and Somali people from foreign occupation. They ended up fighting mostly Somalis and accomplished nothing but misery and mass murder against Somalis, culminating in the death of 1/3 of the northern Somali population. The colonisers continued to rule the land until they willingly left in 1960.
And yet you have Somali nationalists supporting thrm.
Apart from British colonial sources, are there any trusted primary sources that calls the Sayid a terrorist who killed people? Trusting what some racist imperialist said about the Sayid 100 years ago would be like trusting what a master has to say about his slave or what a rapist had to say about his victim. A person who relies on colonial sources too much would either be ignorant or has some sort of inferiority complex or he could have a qabiil (Clan) agenda. I don't know much about the Sayid myself but I've seen people (Especially on Twitter) make a lot of claims about him so I'm just curious to know what really happened.I've been saying this for long. The mad mullah frequently attacked and stole Somali stock and killed them.
Well look at the sources urself. Sure they might mostly be British but what else do u expect? Somali sources are limityed whereas British ones are clear and accessible. But I def get what u mean, his image might have been smudged somewhat but then again I'm not an expert myself. What I do know is that he at least fought the British colonialists, at least that's something.Apart from British colonial sources, are there any trusted primary sources that calls the Sayid a terrorist who killed people? Trusting what some racist imperialist said about the Sayid 100 years ago would be like trusting what a master has to say about his slave or what a rapist had to say about his victim. A person who relies on colonial sources too much would either be ignorant or has some sort of inferiority complex or he could have a qabiil (Clan) agenda. I don't know much about the Sayid myself but I've seen people (Especially on Twitter) make a lot of claims about him so I'm just curious to know what really happened.
I meant the Black People/Asians living in the West at the time, not the colonies. Should have worded it better tbh.No chance dawg. My great-grandfather served in the SCC during WWII but I'll never wear a poppy voluntarily. f*ck the british. Any reer somaliland, who bootyclaps for the british are a smudge on our name.
He was a warrior of Islam that fought the infidels. Any clan that opposed him and sided with the British he considered non Muslim which corresponded with sacking of their cattle and mass murder. Which, is what they deserved for siding with infidels against their own Muslim brothers.Apart from British colonial sources, are there any trusted primary sources that calls the Sayid a terrorist who killed people? Trusting what some racist imperialist said about the Sayid 100 years ago would be like trusting what a master has to say about his slave or what a rapist had to say about his victim. A person who relies on colonial sources too much would either be ignorant or has some sort of inferiority complex or he could have a qabiil (Clan) agenda. I don't know much about the Sayid myself but I've seen people (Especially on Twitter) make a lot of claims about him so I'm just curious to know what really happened.
I'm not an expert on this so I wouldn't say he mass murdered clans (Killing innocents) and stole their cattle. It's only British colonial sources claiming him to be some sort of monster, I don't believe their claims. He was a rebel so there obviously going to lie about him and spread all sorts of deceptive propaganda.He was a warrior of Islam that fought the infidels. Any clan that opposed him and sided with the British he considered non Muslim which corresponded with sacking of their cattle and mass murder. Which, is what they deserved for siding with infidels against their own Muslim brothers.
Are there any source reference for these claims? The story of the girl being sold for timir had nothing to do with the dervishes. It's just someone telling the story.
Yes I did get them from twitter during a clan bashing session. lol. tbh the text seems real, it's hard to edit the image like that. idk how legit these sources are and u might be right.Are there any source reference for these claims? The story of the girl being sold for timir had nothing to do with the dervishes. It's just someone telling the story.
I could tell where you got all these screenshots from, you got them from Twitter. Usually anonymous Isaaq (Sometimes MJ) twitter trolls are using these screenshots in their arguments with Dhulbahante's on twitter. If they came from British colonial sources, I would simply disregard them as colonial propaganda. The man (The Sayid) was a rebel against the British so they would obviously lie about him in order to bring down his rebellion. They made up a bunch of BS such as the "Mad mullah" killing his wife whose the daughter of Sultan Osman.