Valid rant or nah?

Internet Nomad

✪𝙎𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙯𝙯𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙖✪
So this also applies to white Americans or is it just only for black americans when a bad black american does something awful like this?
White Americans have the luxury of having cultures and countries that display their value. Black people in America are predominantly poorer than white people and are displayed as thugs and rappers in pop media that is exported to the world.

People don't want to admit it, but the standing of your ethnicity has a massive contribution to how people look at you, especially in non-politically-correct countries.
 

Aurelian

Forza Somalia!
VIP
It's this victim mentality that @Aurelian pushes that will doom any community it touches.

Nobody says that innocent Black people don't get profiled or haven't gone through historical hurdles set up by white people that set them up to fail and that we can't see the effects still lingering today.

What OP is saying is that Black people have autonomy, and with that autonomy, they are doing actions that cast a negative image towards the whole community.

A single Black guy on a train carriage wilding out can radicalise 30 Japs to having negative opinions, and it doesn't stop there, as they will speak about the moment to their friends and family, further pushing the stereotype.

It's the actions of a few that ruin it for the rest.

It has to stem from a grassroots cultural movement that weeds out the trash within the community, and everything I said here can be said exactly for the Somali community.
The video of the black guy was saying profiling is not racist or having the "usual suspect" is not wrong. Like why the whole black community should viewed as usual suspect because a dumb dude does crimes? There are whites who do the same thing, but it is not the whole white community's fault, but when a black does the same, it is the responsibility of the whole community.
 

Internet Nomad

✪𝙎𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙯𝙯𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙖✪
The video of the black guy was saying profiling is not racist or having the "usual suspect" is not wrong. Like why the whole black community should viewed as usual suspect because a dumb dude does crimes? There are whites who do the same thing, but it is not the whole white community's fault, but when a black does the same, it is the responsibility of the whole community.
Profiling is not always racism sometimes its just natural pattern recognition.

If you hate it so much take it up against those who validate the sterotype.

You have been brainwashed with leftist thought and take natural mechanism which humans have used since adam to be racist.
 
Let’s be honest blacks commit the majority of crime in America when the degenerates go overseas you think there behavior will change

I know white and black Americans who travel there educated and cultured besides outside of these dumb steamers hood rats can’t really afford a plane ticket
Does not mean you should profile people, mistreat or discriminate.

It is not an act of justice to punish a whole community for the actions of a few. Rather, it would be a act of injustice.


By the way the original video is a skit allegedly so take everything you see here with a grain of salt.
 
Profiling is not always racism sometimes its just natural pattern recognition.

If you hate it so much take it up against those who validate the sterotype.

You have been brainwashed with leftist thought and take natural mechanism which humans have used since adam to be racist.
Do not get angry when Europeans or people generally discriminate against you then.
 

Aurelian

Forza Somalia!
VIP
Profiling is not always racism sometimes its just natural pattern recognition.

If you hate it so much take it up against those who validate the sterotype.

You have been brainwashed with leftist thought and take natural mechanism which humans have used since adam to be racist.
No, I mean why it is right to profile, even if it shows it mostly happen to innocent people, because of minority to crimes? Why is that in a civilized and rational world we excuse borderline racism when we know that the faults of one person are not the responsibility of another?
 
if the link doesnt work
https:// old.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/1hy3ejb/at_a_loss_of_words_watching_this/
remove the space between the // and old
Blacks in general have a lack of care for societies standards some have said this is iq related but even aboriginals don't act like this I think they have a terrible culture which celebrates bad behaviour. So throwing junk on the floor is applauded rather than looked down on same with stealing or shooting and killing a person all celebrated in black culture hence why they are taking this attitude with them when they take trips elsewhere. I reckon soon It will get bad enough to the point that blacks won't be able to travel outside the US due to the bad behaviour of their peers which is already happening in places like Latin America there were cases of blacks being killed by locals there. So yes this is a cultural problem for blacks and if they don't get rid of it they will be banned from every country outside the US.
 

Internet Nomad

✪𝙎𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙯𝙯𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙖✪
Do not get angry when Europeans or people generally discriminate against you then.
I would be more upset at those who reinforce the stereotype as they feed into fears of the judger.

Unless it was a stereotype that had no reason behind it or was blown out of proportion, then I would be upset that the judger is penalising me for something that is a fable.
No, I mean why it is right to profile, even if it shows it mostly happen to innocent people, because of minority to crimes? Why is that in a civilized and rational world we excuse borderline racism when we know that the faults of one person are not the responsibility of another?
People have a right to believe in whatever they want to believe. Profiling is just pattern recognition. It's something common that everyone has. If every person with green eyes was mean to you. You would start to stereotype people with green eyes. It doesn't mean you believe that everyone with green eyes is bad; it's just what you observed.

You have a naive view of people that you think everyone is going to give the other person the benefit of doubt but if your a shopkeeper and your income is on the line then you dont care if you offend its your bussiness that matters the most.

If you want a society that give other people benefit of the doubt then that would be a product of a high trust society one where people share common background, ideals and is low crime.
 
I would be more upset at those who reinforce the stereotype as they feed into fears of the judger.

Unless it was a stereotype that had no reason behind it or was blown out of proportion, then I would be upset that the judger is penalising me for something that is a fable.
So you would be fine with a racist claiming that you or your friends are likely to be a criminal and lazy then?

Or with an employer discriminating against you or your friends on basis of ethnicity, due to these stereotypes?

According to your logic, this is all ok.
 

Internet Nomad

✪𝙎𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙯𝙯𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙖✪
So you would be fine with a racist claiming that you or your friends are likely to be a criminal and lazy then?

Or with an employer discriminating against you or your friends on basis of ethnicity, due to these stereotypes?

According to your logic, this is all ok.
You lefties love to moralise things rather seening the world for the way it is. Do i like sterotypes or profiling? No, but i can recognise that its a real thing that is SOMETIMES rooted from reasonable events.
 
You lefties love to moralise things rather seening the world for the way it is. Do i like sterotypes or profiling? No, but i can recognise that its a real thing that is SOMETIMES rooted from reasonable events.

It's not 'moralising' or anything. I can fully accept that stereotypes exist that seem valid, but it isn't okay to assume that a new person you meet is likely a criminal or some other negative attitude because for every criminal of one ethnic group, there are definitely 1000s more who are not.

Also I am not a 'leftie'. Why are you speaking like an American?
 
Blacks had tried to create wealth by investing to the point of having their own black Wall Street in Tulsa, but whites didn't allow them. So you got Tulsa massacre

Tulsa race massacre



Blacks had better family connection in 60's than 70-90 or now because of cocaine the CIA were selling to black gangs to dry black families out of cash and sent the money to pro US militia's abroad. It was systemic destruction of black families.




Then the US made war on drugs policy to go hard on drug users 10-30 years for possessing small amount of cocaine or weed, it was designed so that it affected blacks more than any body else, racial profiling as you seen above where a white guy stealing ended up stopping a black guy, was rampant in war on drugs days and police used to plant drugs and weed in black men clothes or cars and from there you get many black men getting locked up for decades for soemthing they didn't do. Body camera saved many lives

You can provide as much tangible evidence to show how horrific groups that have been racialised as black in this world have had it, along with how any material attempt to improve their standing in this world was met with direct opposition along with the fabric of their culture being laced with things like the crack epidemic to ensure those attempts of self improvement never happened again, and the idiots on this forum will still say:

"Get over it and do better, its not the white man's fault the world hates you"

Wallahi I truly wonder why such a humongous subsection of our Internet community views themselves as so different from whatever "blackness" entails. I know it's been said 1000 times on here but I've yet to see another Horn African born and raised in the west think like this irl, only online. Everything negative thing that gets perpetuated by these people applies to us as well because we also fall into this racial classification
 
You can provide as much tangible evidence to show how horrific groups that have been racialised as black in this world have had it, along with how any material attempt to improve their standing in this world was met with direct opposition along with the fabric of their culture being laced with things like the crack epidemic to ensure those attempts of self improvement never happened again, and the idiots on this forum will still say:

"Get over it and do better, its not the white man's fault the world hates you"

Wallahi I truly wonder why such a humongous subsection of our Internet community views themselves as so different from whatever "blackness" entails. I know it's been said 1000 times on here but I've yet to see another Horn African born and raised in the west think like this irl, only online. Everything negative thing that gets perpetuated by these people applies to us as well because we also fall into this racial classification
It's a form of cope - people do not want to associate with them, due to racial bigotry and etc.

Also white envy too.
 
It's not 'moralising' or anything. I can fully accept that stereotypes exist that seem valid, but it isn't okay to assume that a new person you meet is likely a criminal or some other negative attitude because for every criminal of one ethnic group, there are definitely 1000s more who are not.

Also I am not a 'leftie'. Why are you speaking like an American?
People who use words like leftie,woke,dei are all wanabe yt guys or actual yt guys with digital black face. Users like tht are on 4chan or red pill youtube and suk up to them. They dont care about facts.
 
GgTAw23XAAAwHAL.jpeg
 
The large class divide in America has many causes but one of them is that black people were not being allowed to buy land when it was cheap, whereas white people had their chance to build generational wealth and find wealth/oil on their bought land
Blacks missed out on key real estate building opportunities on the 60s but even then they had vibrant communities with disposable income

However hood culture has poisoned them even more than racict government policies even then the poverty rate of blacks dropped 20 percent in the 50s and then shot up by 85 percent in the 60s and 70s
I have to agree with @ilmoweyn . Black poverty rate increased in the 50/60s mainly because of discrimination, although it was prevalent throughout the decades before it.

It began first through job-loss.

Just as black unemployment had increased in the South with the mechanization of cotton production, black unemployment in Northern cities soared as labor-saving technology eliminated many semiskilled and unskilled jobs that historically had provided many blacks with work.

In the 1950s and '60s, Black sharecroppers, tenant farmers, and agricultural laborers in the South — the poorest of the poor — were being replaced by machines and forced off the land by plantation owners determined to reduce Afro-American populations before they achieved voting majorities in Black Belt counties. Freedom Movement efforts such as the Mississippi Freedom Labor Union, Poor Peoples Corporations, and Co-Ops had little long-term success, and new streams of unskilled, rural poor flowed into the urban slums of the North and West.


Then through series of barring them from work, investments, loans/banking/insurances/mortgages, housing , political power and education

Segregation even acted as wealth extraction from where nonresidential whites would just suck the money out of Black communities, after barring them from everything basically.

Landlords would only rent apartments to tenants of the designated race, banks and federal agencies wouldn't give or insure mortgages to buyers of the wrong color, realtors steered their clients to the "correct" neighborhoods. In some instances, real estate ads and classified listings of available apartments explicitly stated racial restrictions. The deeds to many homes, apartment buildings, and developments contained restrictive covenants specifying who they could be sold or rented to. While most of these restrictions referred only to race, some also barred Jews, for example:

"Said Property shall not be sold, conveyed, granted or leased, in whole or in part, to any Hebrew person or family, or any person or family not of the white race, nor shall any Hebrew person, or other person not of the white race, be permitted to occupy any portion of said property or any building thereon, except a domestic servant actually employed by the owner of said property."

Some white suburbs were known as "sundown towns" where people of color had to be gone by sundown or face arrest on trumped-up charges, or vigilante violence, or both. In many cases, official signs were posted to make this policy explicit. In Hawthorne CA, for example, a sign read: ", Don't Let The Sun Set On YOU In Hawthorne." But most of the signs simply said: "Whites Only Within City Limits After Dark".

Within the ghetto, economic power was primarily held by businesses and institutions owned by non-resident whites who financially profited from segregated housing. They enriched themselves, and by so doing placed added burdens — often insurmountable ones — on people trying climb out poverty.


They would also force them to pay high prices and rents for slum rund down apartments significantly higher than what white people would pay significantly less for nice neat sanitary new apartments.

This gives you more or less a run down of it and goes through the laws enacted.

Ghettos, Segregation, & Poverty in the 1960s​


Read it


Asian Americans who came to America 30 years ago with nothing now earn more than whites per capita due to hard work and valuing education racism is no longer an excuse

The first waves of Asian Americans were discriminated against and hated and formed apart of the lower rungs of society when they arrived. They even hate similar laws in place that restricted them and later they actually banned them. They made posters, exhibits with blatant racist caricatures of them.


While these cultural values are positive, it is worth remembering that less than a century ago, Asians were described as illiterate, undesirable, and unassimilable immigrants, full of “filth and disease.” As “marginal members of the human race,” they were denied the right to naturalize, denied the right to intermarry, and were residentially segregated in crowded ethnic enclaves. They were even, in the case of Japanese immigrants, forced into internment camps.

These Asian immigrants are not only more highly educated than U.S. citizens, they’re more highly educated than their own countrymen. This reflects high selectivity among those who chose to immigrate. For example, 53% of Korean immigrants to the U.S. have a bachelor’s degree or higher, compared to only 36% of adults in South Korea.

Among Chinese and Vietnamese immigrants, the selectivity is far greater: 51% of Chinese immigrants and 26% of Vietnamese immigrants have at least a bachelor’s degree, compared to only 5% of adults in China and Vietnam. This is where we see “hyper-selectivity.”

It's only later on the migration pattern changed with self selectiveness, its only the rich affluent educated Asians and Chinese that migrate to America from their homeland, not the average person.


Also they benefit a lot from government sponsored grants start businesses when they arrive.
 
Last edited:

Trending

Top