Even the Bible mentions our Cushitic master race. Our forefather Cush was Noah’s son. We were a mighty race indeed when Cush’s son Nimrod struck fear into the hearts of many.
Nimrod was a d*ck though. f*ck him.
I know you’re non-Muslim waryaa, so of course you don’t believe in the great tale of Prophet Noah (AS).Noah's flood was a local flood, not a global one.
I know you’re non-Muslim waryaa, so of course you don’t believe in the great tale of Prophet Noah (AS).
But best believe our prophet survived a global flood with his family and other believers. We Somalis (and other Cushites) are his direct descendants. Mashallah. I ain’t no dusty Berber and Nilote mutt. I am the granddaughter of a great man.
Whilst you’re correct that there is no physical border between Upper Egypt and North Sudan, the entire region is a desert and uninhabitable outside the Nile River. Up to the first cataract of the Nile River has defined the border of Upper Egypt, whilst the 2nd to 6th cataracts of the Nile River has always been controlled by the Nubians/Kingdom of Kush/Sudanese:
Brazilians are triracial(Native American + European + West African) and are a recent mix(less than 400 years) so they’re not comparable to Somalis. We on the other hand have existed for thousands of years, have adapted to the semi-arid lands of Somalia and have stabilised our population.Those two races couldn't produce a 'Somali'.
Which is why this whole Nilotic mixing with Levantines is so ridiculous. If such a thing happened, the product would probably resemble this...
Also, the Somali look is homogeneous. Any homogenous population couldn't get their looks simply through admixture alone. Which is why Brazilians look different from eachother, since they are heavily admixed. Any Somali admixture happened through a combined process of evolution (mainly/primary) and admixture (slightly/secondary).
Second point:
According to many anthropologists, Nilotes and Cushites existed as long as eachother... Some scholars even point to a minority community of the Cushitic Beja (who have no Nilotic admixture) who possess Y-DNA Haplogroup A as evidence of the aforementioned position. So to say that Cushites are descendants of Nilotes is factually incorrect.
Thank you walaal. I read your posts and it's eye opening. None of them have debated why the Ancient Egyptians claimed Somalia as their homeland. It wouldn't make sense for brown Arabs with the most superior civilization ever to claim some black Horn Africans that they supposedly had no relation with. But these self-haters and this random cadaan will never address this, nor the other points I made.
Also Moses (AS) was black. So why is it so hard to believe the Ancient Egyptians, who raised and adopted him, were too?
Plus I have joked around saying that Somalis are mixed, but I truly don't believe that we are. How come we're the mixed ones in Africa, yet Bantus and Berbers are "pure" Africans? It's just a bunch of bullshit to me. Whites, Arabs, and Bantus all want to label the unique history and phenotype of us Cushitic people. They've always done that for years claiming that we're a mixed people, but not them. They get to be pure for some reason but not us.
According to the Bible, Moses was Hebrew, a descendant of Shem. In Numbers 12:1, his siblings Miriam and Aaron, chastise him for marrying a Cushite woman, as the Hebrews were forbidden to marry Canaanites, children of Ham. God punishes Miriam for questioning Moses' authority by giving her leprosy, turning her skin white.
The Hebrews in Egypt before the Exodus were in Goshen, the eastern Delta, all of which was a Libyan stronghold.
You notice little difference between Libyans and Asiatics, who would have included the Hebrews.
See https://www.somalispot.com/threads/we-have-no-claim-to-ancient-egypt.55341/page-9#post-1516997, above.
The earliest settlers in the Delta were Libyans, and the "pre-dynastic" kings and queens recorded in the first register of the Palermo stone are all Libyans.
Libyans contributed to several dynasties, and check these:
- Twenty-third Dynasty of Egypt - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-third_Dynasty_of_Egypt
The Twenty-third Dynasty of Egypt (notated Dynasty XXIII, alternatively 23rd Dynasty or Dynasty 23) is usually classified as the third dynasty of the ancient Egyptian Third Intermediate Period. This dynasty consisted of a number of Meshwesh ancient Libyan ( Berber ) kings, who ruled either as pharaohs or independent kings of parts of Upper Egypt from 880 BC to 720 BC, and pharaohs from 837 BC to 728 BC.
- Late Period of Ancient Egypt – Libyan dynasty (945 – 715 ...
www.shorthistory.org/ancient-civilizations/...
TWENTY-FOURTH DYNASTY (727. – 715.) Tefnakht (727. – 720.) He founded the dynasty in Sais, and at the same time, Hermopolis had Nemaret (Nimlot) as a king, Peftjauawybast was a king in Herakleopolis, Osorkon in Bubastis and Iuput in Leontopolis. Tefnakht ruled over the Mashauasha while Libu (Libyans) tribes hold parts of the Delta under their command.
- Third Intermediate Period of Egypt - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Intermediate_Period...
Upper Egypt remained for a time under the rule of Tantamani, whilst Lower Egypt was ruled from 664 BC by the Twenty-Sixth Dynasty, client kings established by the Assyrians who nevertheless managed to successfully bring about Egypt's political independence during the time of troubles facing the Assyrian empire.
- The Libyans in Egypt - The Immanuel Velikovsky Archive
www.varchive.org/tac/libyans.htm
The Libyans in Egypt The period of Libyan domination in Egypt, the Twenty-second Dynasty, is said by Manetho to have lasted for a hundred and twenty years: (1) “But the accepted chronology,” wrote Sir Alan Gardiner, “finds itself compelled to legislate for fully two centuries. . .”
- The Libyans in Egypt: Resolving the Third Intermediate Period
www.starways.net/lisa/essays/slibyans.html
The Libyans in Egypt: Resolving the Third Intermediate Period © Martin Sieff. Central to solving the perplexing chronology of the Third Intermediate Period in Egypt is the dating of the Twenty-Second (Libyan) Dynasty.
Moses(A.S) was definitely not Madow, don’t lie about a prophet’s background.
Dark skin doesn’t make you black though. A Sri Lankan can have the same skin colour as a dinka but he still will be referred to as brown.
my ancestors was kangz.The Somalis & other Horners that claim Ancient Egyptians came from the Horn need to stop embarrassing themselves. Genetic studies have confirmed that Ancient Egyptians are North African/Eurasian and are closely related to their fellow North Africans, the Amazigh. The Coptic people & other Modern Egyptians are the truest representation & the true descendants of Ancient Egyptians.
Plus, the name "Kemet" was in reference to the black soil of their land, not the people.
The only differences between Ancient & Modern Egyptians are:
1. Modern Egyptians, especially the Muslim ones carry some Madow/sub-Saharan admixture, whereas their Coptic countrymen did not mix at all & retained the pure Egyptian blood. The Ancient Egyptians lacked any Madow admixture, since it was forbidden to mix in their culture with the Madows.
2. Arabisation (language & culture) & other cultural influences from Greeks & Persians e.g have been absorbed into Egyptian culture via Islamic/Arab conquest, Eastern Roman and Persian occupation.
Lol the Prophet himself said Moses was black. And he lived in Africa, not India. Nice try.
Nigga, Moses was black. The Prophet Muhammad himself said so. Christian tales are only secondary sources in my opinion. Islamic facts > Christian ones.According to the Bible, Moses was Hebrew, a descendant of Shem. In Numbers 12:1, his siblings Miriam and Aaron, chastise him for marrying a Cushite woman, as the Hebrews were forbidden to marry Canaanites, children of Ham. God punishes Miriam for questioning Moses' authority by giving her leprosy, turning her skin white.
The Hebrews in Egypt before the Exodus were in Goshen, the eastern Delta, all of which was a Libyan stronghold.
You notice little difference between Libyans and Asiatics, who would have included the Hebrews.
See https://www.somalispot.com/threads/we-have-no-claim-to-ancient-egypt.55341/page-9#post-1516997, above.
The earliest settlers in the Delta were Libyans, and the "pre-dynastic" kings and queens recorded in the first register of the Palermo stone are all Libyans.
Libyans contributed to several dynasties, and check these:
- Twenty-third Dynasty of Egypt - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-third_Dynasty_of_Egypt
The Twenty-third Dynasty of Egypt (notated Dynasty XXIII, alternatively 23rd Dynasty or Dynasty 23) is usually classified as the third dynasty of the ancient Egyptian Third Intermediate Period. This dynasty consisted of a number of Meshwesh ancient Libyan ( Berber ) kings, who ruled either as pharaohs or independent kings of parts of Upper Egypt from 880 BC to 720 BC, and pharaohs from 837 BC to 728 BC.
- Late Period of Ancient Egypt – Libyan dynasty (945 – 715 ...
www.shorthistory.org/ancient-civilizations/...
TWENTY-FOURTH DYNASTY (727. – 715.) Tefnakht (727. – 720.) He founded the dynasty in Sais, and at the same time, Hermopolis had Nemaret (Nimlot) as a king, Peftjauawybast was a king in Herakleopolis, Osorkon in Bubastis and Iuput in Leontopolis. Tefnakht ruled over the Mashauasha while Libu (Libyans) tribes hold parts of the Delta under their command.
- Third Intermediate Period of Egypt - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Intermediate_Period...
Upper Egypt remained for a time under the rule of Tantamani, whilst Lower Egypt was ruled from 664 BC by the Twenty-Sixth Dynasty, client kings established by the Assyrians who nevertheless managed to successfully bring about Egypt's political independence during the time of troubles facing the Assyrian empire.
- The Libyans in Egypt - The Immanuel Velikovsky Archive
www.varchive.org/tac/libyans.htm
The Libyans in Egypt The period of Libyan domination in Egypt, the Twenty-second Dynasty, is said by Manetho to have lasted for a hundred and twenty years: (1) “But the accepted chronology,” wrote Sir Alan Gardiner, “finds itself compelled to legislate for fully two centuries. . .”
- The Libyans in Egypt: Resolving the Third Intermediate Period
www.starways.net/lisa/essays/slibyans.html
The Libyans in Egypt: Resolving the Third Intermediate Period © Martin Sieff. Central to solving the perplexing chronology of the Third Intermediate Period in Egypt is the dating of the Twenty-Second (Libyan) Dynasty.
Who cares what anthropologists have to say? This is a discussion of genetics.
Exactly. Moses would have blended in with present day Somalis, not olive-skinned Arabs who would have gladly called him an abeed today.
