The Eurasian bottleneck likely occured inside Africa.But Horn Africans are in fact 40-50% Eurasian and have been like that for at least 5, 000 years ; your features are your own because they're not exactly found in Eurasians or unadmixed Africans.
This study is outdated, it has been reanalysed, the authors made a mistake, this Ethiopian remain doesn't have any appreciable amount of Eurasian ancestry.Here's a study on it:
![]()
DNA from 4,500-year-old Ethiopian reveals surprise about ancestry of Africans
DNA from a man who lived in Ethiopia about 4,500 years ago is prompting scientists to rethink the history of human migration in Africa.www.latimes.com
Somali facial features are closer to Med Europeans than it is to Niger-Congo people.somalis look much more black than white, anyone claiming we dont have black features should show us how caucasian they look. .
Ethiopian woman are such Ass kissers... reading their responses in the comments has me cringing at the level of self hate for them to say that "Horn africans" are mixed race and going along with the patronizing African Americans calling our features "Eurocentric" when were the fucking blueprint. They need to speak for themselves... uff.
View attachment 218872
Shoutout to the Somali gal for speaking the truth and calling out Chrissie dissing our lineage and history.
View attachment 218871
No because because south Asians aren’t SSA, And in order to be considered black you need to have SSA ancestry.we don't and stop pretending we do, south asians have dark skin should they also be "Black"
I’d disagree, Somalis have smaller noses, and bigger lips then Mediterranean Europeans, Mediterranean Europeans look closer to middle esteems than anything.Somali facial features are closer to Med Europeans than it is to Niger-Congo people.
There is actual data on Somali craniofacial traits which is far more clear cut than some person's opinion:Somali facial features are closer to Med Europeans than it is to Niger-Congo people.
saxib you should be the last person to bring up caucasian science considering youre darkskin. just looks embarrassing that someone madow is trying to argue we are more white than black when most somalis have brownskin, thick curly hair, big lips which are all typically features of an African.There is actual data on Somali craniofacial traits which is far more clear cut than some person's opinion:
![]()
The questionable contribution of the Neolithic and the Bronze Age to European craniofacial form - PMC
Many human craniofacial dimensions are largely of neutral adaptive significance, and an analysis of their variation can serve as an indication of the extent to which any given population is genetically related to or differs from any other. When 24 ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Somali craniofacial traits are pretty much "Caucasoid" on average and seem to have taken after the ancient MENA side of our ancestry. Though we do show strong "Negroid" leanings in terms of cranial nonmetric and dental traits, if I recall correctly. Not to mention the fuller lips (though not everted) and curly hair usually on a spectrum between full-on Afro-textured hair and straight/wavy hair. Forgive the use of the suugo scientific terminologies. You get the gist, though.
saxib you should be the last person to bring up caucasian science considering youre darkskin. just looks embarrassing that someone madow is trying to argue we are more white than black when most somalis have brownskin, thick curly hair, big lips which are all typically features of an African.
just because our skull is 'similar' to Caucasians doesn't dispute the fact we have much more similarities with other Africans than Europeans.
Maybe, i don't really know tbh, I said that just to say Horner features are closer to Euros than they are to Niger Congo people, in response to the guy saying our features are "much more black"I’d disagree, Somalis have smaller noses, and bigger lips then Mediterranean Europeans, Mediterranean Europeans look closer to middle esteems than anything.
the only features horners have closer to Euros are their noses. Other than that, big lips, brown-dark skin, curvy figures etc which I see Somalis have are well known African traits.Maybe, i don't really know tbh, I said that just to say Horner features are closer to Euros than they are to Niger Congo people, in response to the guy saying our features are "much more black"
Based on metric data (measurements from orbits, nasal bone etc...) we are a lot closer to Europeans than we are to some Africans, in some cases such as prognathism, which has historically been treated as a marker of SSA ancestry, we have a lower degree of it than many Europeans lolsaxib you should be the last person to bring up caucasian science considering youre darkskin. just looks embarrassing that someone madow is trying to argue we are more white than black when most somalis have brownskin, thick curly hair, big lips which are all typically features of an African.
just because our skull is 'similar' to Caucasians doesn't dispute the fact we have much more similarities with other Africans than Europeans.
Maybe because it’s rooted in pseudoscience? And white supremacy at that. Why can’t they be “African” features (which they are because Somalis are undoubtedly African)What the hell are you talking about? I'm not arguing that we are "white". That is absurd. We are East Africans who are an ancient (the pyramids didn't exist when 70-90% of it happened) mix of something related to Nilotes like Dinkas (50-60%) and something related to MENAs (40-50%) (closest modern groups being Arabians and Coptic Egyptians). But yes, we are "Caucasoid" in craniofacial traits. Why does this trigger you or seem like something worth denying?
Maybe, i don't really know tbh, I said that just to say Horner features are closer to Euros than they are to Niger Congo people, in response to the guy saying our features are "much more black"
Do Europeans claim you?Based on metric data (measurements from orbits, nasal bone etc...) we are a lot closer to Europeans than we are to some Africans, in some cases such as prognathism, which has historically been treated as a marker of SSA ancestry, we have a lower degree of it than many Europeans lol
This isn't mutually exclusive with being African, I see no reason why these features couldn't have come into existence inside Africa.
That's not a pseudoscientific paper. The author who wrote it outright contests the use of terms like "Caucasoid" and "Negroid". He and his cohorts are just no nonsense anthropologists who measured cranial traits and mapped them like on that display you see. I used "Caucasoid" for simplicity to say "facial features leaning toward West Eurasian". Apologies for the use of suugo science terms at least.Maybe because it’s rooted in pseudoscience? And white supremacy at that. Why can’t they be “African” features (which they are because Somalis are undoubtedly African)
this is why we have people saying “horners have Eurocentric features” implying they get their features from white people. When it’s the other way around.
It doesn't trigger me at all, its just funny that the most black looking people try the hardest to prove these sort of things.What the hell are you talking about? I'm not arguing that we are "white". That is absurd. We are East Africans who are an ancient (the pyramids didn't exist when 70-90% of it happened) mix of something related to Nilotes like Dinkas (50-60%) and something related to MENAs (closest modern groups being Arabians and Coptic Egyptians). But yes, we are "Caucasoid" craniofacial traits. Why does this trigger you or seem like something worth denying?