WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT TAWHEED?

Status
Not open for further replies.
It take you out of the fold of Islam .

https://islamqa.info/en/974

Allaah has commanded us to refer matters to His judgement and to establish Sharee‘ah, and He has forbidden us to rule with anything else, as is clear from a number of aayaat in the Qur’aan, such as the aayaat in Soorat al-Maa’idah (5) which discuss ruling according to what Allaah has revealed, and mention the following topics:

The command to rule according to what Allaah has revealed: “And so judge between them by what Allaah has revealed . . .” [aayah 49]

Warning against ruling by other than what Allaah has revealed: “. . . and follow not their vain desires . . .” [aayah 49]

Warning against compromising on any detail of Sharee‘ah, no matter how small: “. . . but beware of them lest they turn you far away from some of that which Allaah has sent down to you . . .” [aayah 49]

Forbidding seeking the ruling of jaahiliyyah, as is expressed in the rhetorical question “Do they then seek the judgement of (the Days of) Ignorance?” [aayah 50]

The statement that nobody is better than Allaah to judge: “. . . and who is better in judgement than Allaah for a people who have firm Faith?” [aayah 50]

The statement that whoever does not judge according to what Allaah revealed is a kaafir, a zaalim (oppressor or wrongdoer) and a faasiq (sinner), as Allaah says: “. . . And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed, such are the kaafiroon.” [aayah 44]; “. . . And whoever does not judge by that which Allaah has revealed, such are the zaalimoon (polytheists and wrongdoers)” [aayah 45]; “. . . And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed (then) such (people) are the faasiqoon (rebellious or disobedient).” [aayah 47].

The statement that it is obligatory for the Muslims to judge according to what Allaah has revealed, even if those who seek their judgement are not Muslim, as Allaah says: “. . . And if you judge, judge with justice between them. . .” [aayah 42]

Judging or ruling according to other than what Allaah has revealed is contrary to faith and Tawheed, which are Allaah’s rights. It may be counted as kufr akbar (greater kufr) or kufr asghar (lesser kufr) according to circumstances. Kufr akbar will make a person no longer a Muslim in cases such as the following:

If he issues laws and regulations other than those revealed by Allaah, because the right to issue laws belongs to Allaah alone, Who has no partner, and whoever “competes” with Him in a matter which is His alone is a mushrik, because Allaah says: “Or have they partners with Allaah (false gods), who have instituted for them a religion which Allaah has not allowed?” [al-Shooraa 42:21]

If the one who rules by other than that which Allaah has revealed denies the right of Allaah and His Prophet to rule, as is mentioned in Ibn ‘Abbaas’s comment on the aayah:“. . . And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed, such are the kaafiroon.” [al-Maa’idah 5:44]. Ibn ‘Abbaas said: “Whoever rejects what Allaah has revealed is a kaafir.”

If he prefers the rule of falsehood to the rule of Allaah, whether this is in absolute terms or just in a few matters. Allaah says: “Do they then seek the judgement of (the Days of) Ignorance? And who is better in judgement than Allaah for a people who have firm Faith?” [al-Maa’idah 5:50]

If he regards the rule of Allaah and the rule of falsehood as equal. Allaah says: “. . . Then do not set up rivals unto Allaah (in worship) while you know (that He Alone has the right to be worshipped).” [al-Baqarah 2:22]

If he thinks that it is permissible to rule by something that contradicts the rule of Allaah and His Messenger, or he believes that it is not obligatory to rule according to what Allaah has revealed, or that the matter is optional. This is kufr which is contradictory to faith. Allaah revealed: “O Messenger! Let not those who hurry to fall into disbelief grieve you, of such who say: ‘We believe’ with their mouths but their hearts have no faith. And of the Jews are men who listen much and eagerly to lies - listen to others who have not come to you; they say, ‘If you are given this, take it, but if you are not given this, then beware!’ . . .” [al-Maa’idah 5:41]. He says: “Go to Muhammad (peace be upon him), and if he tells you that the ruling is lashes, accept it, but if he commands stoning, ignore what he says. Then Allaah revealed “. . . And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed, such are the kaafiroon (disbelievers)” [al-Maa’idah 5:44].

If he does not rule according to what Allah has revealed out of stubbornness and arrogance, he is a kaafir and has left Islaam, even if he does not deny the rule of Allaah. Stubbornness and arrogance may mean negligence and turning away, as Allaah says: “Have you seen those (hypocrites) who claim that they believe in that which has been sent down to you, and that which was sent down before you, and they wish to go for judgement (in their disputes) to the Taaghoot (false judges, etc.) while they have been ordered to reject them. But Shaytaan wishes to lead them astray. And when it is said to them: ‘Come to what Allaah has sent down and to the Messenger,’ see they hypocrites turn away from you (Muhammad) with aversion.” [al-Nisaa’ 4:60-61]

Among the things that may be counted as ruling by other than that which Allaah revealed and kufr akbar is what Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibraaheem said about man-made laws and ruling by them: “This is the worst, the most obvious and comprehensive opposition to sharee‘ah and rejection of Allaah’s laws. This is competing with Allaah and His Messenger, contradicting His laws in their preparation, support, structure, ruling and references.

The above is a summary of the things that may imply that ruling by other than that which Allah has revealed is a form of shirk akbar (major shirk):

(1) Ruling by other than that which Allaah has revealed.

(2) Denying the right of Allaah and His Messenger to rule.

(3) Preferring the rule of falsehood to the rule of Allaah, whether this is complete or only in a few matters.

(4) Regarding the rule of Allaah and the rule of falsehood as equal.

(5) Thinking that it is permissible to rule by something that contradicts what Allaah has revealed, or believing that ruling by what Allaah has revealed is not obligatory or is optional.

(6) Refusing to rule by what Allaah has revealed.

By examining this topic from different angels, it becomes clear that what is counted as kufr akbar is the following:

Abolishing sharee‘ah as the law governing a country, as Mustafa Kemal (“Ataturk”) did in Turkey, as he abolished the book Majallah al-Ahkaam al-‘Adliyyah which was based on the Hanafi madhhab, and replaced it with man-made laws.

Abolishing sharee‘ah courts.

Imposing man-made laws, such as Italian, French, German law, etc., to judge between the people, or mixing these laws and Sharee‘ah, as Genghis Khan did in his book al-Yaasiq, which combined laws from different sources; the ‘ulamaa’ (scholars) ruled that he was a kaafir.

Confining the role of sharee‘ah courts to so-called “civil” matters, such as marriage, divorce and inheritance.

Setting up non-sharee‘ah courts.

Discussing sharee‘ah in parliament and voting on it; this indicates that implementing sharee‘ah is conditional upon a majority vote.

Making sharee‘ah a secondary or main source, along with other sources of law. Even when they say that sharee‘ah is the primary source of legislation, this is still kufr akbar, because it means that they are allowing the adoption of laws from other sources too.

Stating in the clauses of legislation that reference may be made to international law, or stating in treaties that in the case of dispute, the matter may be referred to such-and-such non-Islamic court.

Criticizing sharee‘ah in public or in private, such as saying that it is rigid, incomplete or backward, or suggesting that it is incompatible with our times, or expressing admiration for non-Islamic laws.

As regards the question of when ruling by other than what Allaah revealed is kufr asghar, which does not exclude a person from the ummah of Islam:

the answer is that this may be the case when a ruler or judge passes judgement according to other than what Allaah revealed out of disobedience or on a whim, or as a favour to someone, or because he was bribed, and so on, although he believes that it is obligatory to judge according to what Allaah has revealed, and that what he has done is a sinful and haraam deed.

As regards the one who is governed by a non-Islamic law, if he refers to it out of choice, then he is a kaafir whose kufr akbar means that he has left Islaam. But if he has no choice but to refer to this law, and does so reluctantly, then he is not a kaafir, because if he had been able to resort to sharee‘ah, he would have done so, and he believes that this non-Islamic law is false.

And Allaah knows best. May Allaah bless our Prophet Muhammad.


No it doesn't. It is always how a question is framed. Refer to my earlier post.
 

Prince of Lasanod

Eid trim pending
btw, Iftiin, I voted three of the last US presidential elections and more than two year-six term local state elections. And I will be voting to keep the republicans out of power in our state. Best thing I can do for non-muslims and muslims in our state alike as the republicans are anti social and anti poor and drive the state economies to the ground. Even basic education suffers for their cuts in education funding. It is isuess like these that affect you as an individual that people vote.

Educate yourself bra, these are as Islamic as they get.
Sxb, according to him you're no longer a Muslim. He believes that anybody who votes is a kaafir, hundreds of millions of Muslims have left Islam in his brain. Don't engage him, he posted a video of someone who fought with ISIS as proof.
 

Iftiin

Dhulbahante Mujahid //Anti Qabilnimo// Pro Shariah
btw, Iftiin, I voted three of the last US presidential elections and more than two year-six term local state elections. And I will be voting to keep the republicans out of power in our state. Best thing I can do for non-muslims and muslims in our state alike as the republicans are anti social and anti poor and drive the state economies to the ground. Even basic education suffers for their cuts in education funding. It is isuess like these that affect you as an individual that people vote.

Educate yourself bra, these are as Islamic as they get.

No amount of good you do can offset the Shirk you are committing each time you vote.

If somebody was holding a gun to your head and ordering you to vote... then it's permissible.

Otherwise, it's not, no matter how much you may dislike this being the case.
 
Sxb, according to him you're no longer a Muslim. He believes that anybody who votes is a kaafir, hundreds of millions of Muslims have left Islam in his brain. Don't engage him, he posted a video of someone who fought with ISIS as proof.


Islam is not someone's club where they let in who they want or give edicts they view in line with their understanding to the detriment of other Muslims.
 

Iftiin

Dhulbahante Mujahid //Anti Qabilnimo// Pro Shariah
Kulha voting takes you out of Islam :faysalwtf: Wallhai I thought you were a knowledgeable person it's a shame that you're a complete lunatic:siilaanyosmile:

We came together fisabilillah and we departed fisabilillah. It's cool, may Allah guide you.
 
Correct him instead bro.
Sxb it's not up to debate that voting is not Haram let alone takes you out of the religion.
The prophet said who ever of you saw munkaar he shall change it with his hand and if he couldn't with his tongue and if he couldn't with his heart and that is the weakest of Iman
And voting is essentially preventing munkaar
 

Genie

The last suugo bender
You're clearly not a scholar of islam , copying and pasting isn't helping at all , most of these verses of the noble Qur'an is perceived differently by different people hence why we need the interpretation and guidance of a scholar with knowledge and wisdom which clearly you're not , stop what your doing before you become an extremist lunatic and actually start watching lectures and reading books of reputable scholars. That is my sincere advice because it seriously isn't looking good for you mate , next thing you know your running to join al shababb or something. I'm legit seriously worried for you. :yacadiim:
 

Iftiin

Dhulbahante Mujahid //Anti Qabilnimo// Pro Shariah
Sxb it's not up to debate that voting is not Haram let alone takes you out of the religion.
The prophet said who ever of you saw munkaar he shall change it with his hand and if he couldn't with his tongue and if he couldn't with his heart and that is the weakest of Iman
And voting is essentially preventing munkaar

You partially spoke the truth in your first sentence. It's not something that is up for debate, this is something known from aslu deen (the foundation of the deen) that it is haram. {12:40} Legislation is not but for Allah. You can't prevent munkar by committing that which is greater than it, Shirk Akbar.

Can someone clean the floor by taking a dump on it? La hawla wala quwwata illa billah
 
Last edited:

Iftiin

Dhulbahante Mujahid //Anti Qabilnimo// Pro Shariah
You're clearly not a scholar of islam , copying and pasting isn't helping at all , most of these verses of the noble Qur'an is perceived differently by different people hence why we need the interpretation and guidance of a scholar with knowledge and wisdom which clearly you're not , stop what your doing before you become an extremist lunatic and actually start watching lectures and reading books of reputable scholars. That is my sincere advice because it seriously isn't looking good for you mate , next thing you know your running to join al shababb or something. I'm legit seriously worried for you. :yacadiim:

I quoted the fatwa of Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz, Shaykh ‘Abd al-Razzaaq ‘Afeefi, Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Ghadyaan, Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Qa’ood on the first page. Please pay closer attention in the future. I've never, not once, claimed to be a scholar.
 
You spoke the truth in your first sentence. It's not something that is up for debate, this is something known from aslu deen (the foundation of the deen). {12:40} Legislation is not but for Allah. You can't prevent munkar by committing that which is greater than it, Shirk Akbar.

Can someone clean the floor by taking a dump on it? La hawla wala quwwata illa billah
How is this shirk Akbar there's no scholar that says voting is shirk Akbar
 

Prince of Lasanod

Eid trim pending
I quoted the fatwa of Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz, Shaykh ‘Abd al-Razzaaq ‘Afeefi, Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Ghadyaan, Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Qa’ood on the first page. Please pay closer attention in the future. I've never, not once, claimed to be a scholar.
Lol, no you didn't you liar. That fatwa states that it's haram, whilst you stated that it's KUFR meaning you became a KAAFIR. No need to deceive the masses, just post from one of your jihadist sites made by Al Qaeda. The only choice you had was to post from government scholars of Saudi Arabia (what happened to Madkhalis are khawarij?),
 
Lol, no you didn't you liar. That fatwa states that it's haram, whilst you stated that it's KUFR meaning you became a KAAFIR. No need to deceive the masses, just post from one of your jihadist sites made by Al Qaeda.
Sxb almost all scholars say voting is not Haram this guy takes a fatwaa and runs with it it's like me saying that ribba is halal because one scholar said that
 

Genie

The last suugo bender
I quoted the fatwa of Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz, Shaykh ‘Abd al-Razzaaq ‘Afeefi, Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Ghadyaan, Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Qa’ood on the first page. Please pay closer attention in the future. I've never, not once, claimed to be a scholar.

I also said reputable scholars play close attention next time. These scholars are from the same school of thought and same set of 'islamic belief' or should i say sect ,it would work in your favour next time to get spread out scholarly opinions on the matter or else your post is riddled with bias , its like me and my friends agreeing on a matter doesn't make it factual. a little research on Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz and i found this , He was the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia from 1993 until his death in 1999. According to French political scientist Gilles Kepel, Baz was a "figurehead for institutional Wahhabism" whose "immense religious erudition and his reputation for intransigence" gave him prestige among the population of Saudi Arabia and he "could reinforce the Saud family's policies through his influence with the masses of believers", and his death left the government without a comparable figure from within the Wahhabite clergy to "fill" his "shoes". :drakewtf::kanyehmm:
 
No amount of good you do can offset the Shirk you are committing each time you vote.

If somebody was holding a gun to your head and ordering you to vote... then it's permissible.

Otherwise, it's not, no matter how much you may dislike this being the case.


I showed up at the voting booth excited to deal a blow to people I disagree with politically and exercised my blessed US citizenship bra. Didn't need a gun to my head to vote. I encourage others to vote and took them to the voting booth as well. I am not ashamed of voting or think it is religiously wrong.

And no serious scholar would give an edict outside their jurisdiction and where they live. This is considered a matter of Ijtihad. Rules are different for different locations. Answers given depend on how questions are framed and scholars don't base their answer towards a future happenstance.You would not know that anyway, but there saxib. I am milking Islam in a non-muslim country that has been good to my Somali kinsmen. Best thing I can do is to defend it, to invest in it, and to keep its community safe.
 
I also said reputable scholars play close attention next time. These scholars are from the same school of thought and same set of 'islamic belief' or should i say sect ,it would work in your favour next time to get spread out scholarly opinions on the matter or else your post is riddled with bias , its like me and my friends agreeing on a matter doesn't make it factual. a little research on Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz and i found this , He was the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia from 1993 until his death in 1999. According to French political scientist Gilles Kepel, Baz was a "figurehead for institutional Wahhabism" whose "immense religious erudition and his reputation for intransigence" gave him prestige among the population of Saudi Arabia and he "could reinforce the Saud family's policies through his influence with the masses of believers", and his death left the government without a comparable figure from within the Wahhabite clergy to "fill" his "shoes". :drakewtf::kanyehmm:



Bin Baaz was someone who cared about the safety of his country and community. He probably understood the nature of violence and the chaos that would ensue had he given edicts that would encourage the young and the uneducated zealots out to get anyone who disagreed with them in Islamic communities. The Scholars were proven right after all and what they feared happened in many Islamic countries. Nothing but chaos and destruction of property, displacement of Muslims and no sensible meaning to Life other than fear.

Also, the term "Wahhabite" though meant to be insulting, it is not. It originates from the name of Shekh Abdul Wahab who wrote the book of Towhid to fight impurity of Towhid, grave worship, saint worship, and Shi'a practice in Saudi Arabia and Yemen back in His days. Anyone can pull up his book online and see that it has nothing wrong with it that contradicts Islam.
 
Last edited:

Iftiin

Dhulbahante Mujahid //Anti Qabilnimo// Pro Shariah
You can try justifying your shirk to Munkar and Nakir. :mjlol:

I''ve disassociated myself from you and all those who share your line of thinking. O' Allah bare witness to this.
 
You can try justifying your shirk to Munkar and Nakir. :mjlol:

I''ve disassociated myself from you and all those who share your line of thinking. O' Allah bare witness to this.


You will change as you learn more about Islam and go beyond the phase you are in. Trust me, I read the same books you read but had different teachers who were grounded in sunnah and who knew better than instill bitteness in me.

Don't be fooled by ignorant young men bent on destroying their community including yours bro. Nothing good happened for Muslims in the last 20 years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending

Latest posts

Top