Who thought americans will normalize doing Nazi salute in matter of two months

View attachment 355701

National Socialism as a ideology is far more superior to Communism, Democracy, any other. I would argue Somalia would need this more than ever.

Benefits:
National Socialism vs. Communism
Focus on Nation, Not Class
National Socialism unites people by nationality, not just workers, unlike communism’s global class focus, and supporters claim this builds stronger loyalty to your own country.
Some Private Ownership
You can own stuff, but the state controls it for the nation’s good, unlike communism’s total sharing, which they claim offers more freedom than communism’s strict rules.
Strong Leader, Not Equality
A powerful leader runs things, not everyone being equal like communism wants, and they say this leads to faster decisions and less chaos.
Strength Over Peace
It values toughness and military power, not communism’s dream of peace, with the claim that this makes a country tougher and prouder.
If we are talking about Somalia then yes national socialism is the way forward. Because everyone is the same somali But In america theres a whole new black ethnic group in the making let alone all the hispanics near the south border living in what was historically mexico, and the reer minesota. "unites people by nationality, not just workers, unlike communism’s global class focus" and "not everyone being equal like communism wants" means someone is getting prioritised and it is not us it is donald j trump. Communism is also kinda a bad idea because it usually ends up in despotism and the PR of the word in USA especially is awful (like nuclear energy which is actually really efficient and safer than other sources and america has a lot of empty land they should put power station in)

Also National Socialism != Socialism as wikipedia puts it:
Why does this article say that the Nazis were right-wing?
Because that is the consensus of reliable sources, in this case historians and political scientists.
hide
But the word "socialist" is right in their name!
Many political entities have names that can be misleading. Consider, for example, the Holy Roman Empire (a confederation of mainly German territories during the Middle Ages and the early modern period) and North Korea's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (a totalitarian dictatorship). In addition to this, the usage of the word "socialism" by the Nazis is different from the common usage of the term "socialism", which refers to an economic philosophy involving advocacy for social ownership of the means of production.
In the case of the Nazi party, the phrase "national socialist" was a nationalist response to the rise of socialism in Europe by offering a redefinition of "socialism" to refer to the promotion of the interests of the nation, as opposed to ideas of individual self-interest. But there was no policy of social ownership of the means of production. The Nazis did talk about capitalism being bad, but they defined it as a Jewish-originated economic philosophy based on individualism that promoted plutocracy in the interest of the Jews, at the expense of non-Jewish nations and races. This was put in contrast to the Nazis' conception of socialism, which was done in order to win over people attracted to anti-capitalist and socialist ideas to their cause. They rejected ideas of equality and working class solidarity, instead advocating for social hierarchy and national strength. This article sums it up well.

The best model imo is post-WW2 UK socialism
 
Top