"Women are driven by emotions, men are not"- biggest lie ever.

[AbrahamFreedom]

Only Black women.

 

[Angelina]

Only Black women.

Abraham, your grifting is getting boring now. In a year or two you’ll change your shtick. I think for the sake of everyone here, do it soon please.

 

[AbrahamFreedom]

Abraham, your grifting is getting boring now. In a year or two you’ll change your shtick. I think for the sake of everyone here, do it soon please.

I will point out the flaws both Black men and women as much as I like because its true; it's time for the Black community to accept it and improve.

 

[Angelina]

I will point out the flaws both Black men and women as much as I like because its true; it's time for the Black community to accept it and improve.

It’s grift and a marker of societies shift which you follow like a German Shepard. A few years ago when being overly ‘woke’ was in vogue, you were a liberal closeted man playing house, now you’re an anti black supremacist peddling redpill and racialism. Tomorrow, when the tide changes, like the chameleon you are, so will your ideological talking points.

I don’t mind criticism, a lot of what you say about the madow community is rooted in truth, but what you’re peddling is more than that and it’s white superiority and sexism. When that is no longer in fashion, your shtick will change. I’m just asking that you do this sooner rather than later- since it’s boring now. Surprise us a bit.

 

[Nilotic]

Abrahamfreedom is one of the most entertaining characters on this forum; I genuinely chuckle when he puts his little flights of fancy into emission

 

[AbrahamFreedom]

It’s grift and a marker of societies shift which you follow like a German Shepard. A few years ago you were a liberal closeted man playing house, now you’re an anti black supremacist peddling redpill and racialism. Tomorrow, when the tide changes, like the chameleon you are, so will your ideological talking points.

I don’t mind criticism, a lot of what you say about the madow community is rooted in truth, but what you’re peddling is more than that and it’s white superiority and sexism. When that is no longer in fashion, your shtick will change. I’m just asking that you do this sooner rather than later- since it’s boring now. Surprise us a bit.

Don't insult me; I have nothing in common with red pill losers and don't agree with them as its very easy to get a woman. I got a beautiful white woman to buy me food just yesterday without asking because she liked how nice I was to her at an event, even when she knew it would never happen. I have never posted red pill content. I am not a sexist either, which is even more insulting. But I admit white culture is supreme, yes. I say that all the time. Black women and Black men are on the same level.

 

[AbrahamFreedom]

Abrahamfreedom is one of the most entertaining characters on this forum; I genuinely chuckle when he puts his little flights of fancy into emission

I'm not trying to be funny. I genuinely think Black people are problematic.

 

[Angelina]

Abrahamfreedom is one of the most entertaining characters on this forum; I genuinely chuckle when he puts his little flights of fancy into emission

I find it so transparent that he’s a follower of current trends. 2016 to 2021, our resident troll was the beacon of woke, even cos playing as a closeted homosexual who leaned towards liberal feminism. Now we are in the midst of cultural conservatism and white supremacy, our troll has now descended into racialism and redpill.

 

[Angelina]

Don't insult me; I have nothing in common with red pill losers and don't agree with them as its very easy to get a woman. I got a beautiful white woman to buy me food just yesterday without asking because she liked how nice I was to her at an event, even when she knew it would never happen. I have never posted red pill content. I am not a sexist either, which is even more insulting. But I admit white culture is supreme, yes. I say that all the time. Black women and Black men are on the same level.

You do. I’ve had debates with you in which you have used their talking points bar for bar. You also use the talking points of white supremacists and tomorrow God knows whose talking points you’ll take on.

 

[AbrahamFreedom]

You do. I’ve had debates with you in which you have used their talking points bar for bar. You also use the talking points of white supremacists and tomorrow God knows whose talking points you’ll take on.

Coincidence on the redpill garbage.

 

[Angelina]

Coincidence on the redpill garbage.

Are you calling me a troll?

Mr Freedom you’re a troll and a fantastic one at that which is why I have no personal issues with you and actually tend to LOL at your posts. You’re entertaining. I merely ask that you start your new ideological era so that I can be further entertained. You’ve successfully done that with your old undercover gay shtick, your current white supremacist shtick but it’s lost its luster, now it’s time to move on. Be creative and don’t follow current trends, surprise me.

 

[AbrahamFreedom]

I won't accept @Angelina calling me redpill. I feel physically sick you saying that. I have never watched redpill content or know any of them except Kevin Samuels. I will protest you if you continue to say that. I had my suspicions of you being deliberately being dishonest but I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Now, I have my answer. I'm beyond insulted.

 

[Angelina]

I won't accept @Angelina calling me redpill. I feel physically sick you saying that. I have never watched redpill content or know any of them except Kevin Samuels. I will protest you if you continue to say that. I had my suspicions of you being deliberately being dishonest but I have you the benefit of the doubt. Now, I have my answer.

Young man, we’ve debated in detail before and you have used arguments that were indeed redpill. In fact the argument was that modern women need to be okay with the bare minimum if they want a man. I remember we debated in detail.

 

[AbrahamFreedom]

Young man, we’ve debated in detail before and you have used arguments that were indeed redpill. In fact the argument was that modern women need to be okay with the bare minimum if they want a man. I remember we debated in detail.

Just like most men do. Most men and women are nothing special. They need to be humble, especially Black ones. 75% of people make below $50 or 60K a year, have useless skills, average looking or below, lazy, selfish, and don't really have great personalities. Most people deserve the bare minimum. Why is what I said controversial?

 

[NidarNidar]

Most men in prison are from dysfunctional households or single parent(mother) is only present, the father is either dead, locked up or absentee/weak/deadbeat, so there isn't a strong father figure to discipline the child when he acts out.

Boys without fathers present in their lives positively are extremely emotional and impulsive.

 

[offensive bias]

it’s nuanced:

The issue is that people’s definition of emotions is expressive forms that that discounts emotions like anger and rage.

I’ve read studies that highlight that women do tend to report more bouts of sadness and anxiety and due to social norms, women’s openness contributes to the idea of women being more emotional. Furthermore, studies also suggest that women are more likely to struggle with emotional regulation and are more likely to ruminate on negativity than men. Studies also show that women generally score higher in measures of empathy, which means they may be more attuned to the emotions of others and more likely to express compassion and concern. However, empathy does not necessarily equate to being more emotional; it's more about sensitivity and responsiveness to the emotions of others.

On the other hand, when men experience intense emotional distress, they may be more likely to channel it into anger or rage, as this form of emotional expression is often more socially acceptable for them than showing sadness or fear. Studies suggest that, while men may feel emotions like sadness or fear, they are less likely to express these emotions openly, often due to societal expectations. Anger, on the other hand, is more acceptable in certain contexts, and men may feel more comfortable expressing it in public or social settings. This can result in anger being more visibly displayed as rage or aggression.

The biggest issue amongst sexist men is that they don’t seem to understand that their rage and ranting is an example of intense inability to regulate their emotions outwardly. Society due to being patriarchal has shifted the definition of emotions to make it seem as though men showing high levels of hostility isn’t a marker of emotional instability.

There goes that P word again, patriarchy
Blaming men for the very structure of society . A human society can only successfully be run by men , patriarchy as you call it is the only way.

Whenever a society becomes economically prosperous and experiences long periods of peacetime you always get decadence and a shift towards "matriachy " is always the same pattern .
Giving power to women can always be presented as being fair and equalising things.
The reality is empowering women would be my number 1 act when I am a dictator, or part of powerful clique.
Women are psychologically enable of rebellion, whatever the official government or powers that be say becomes holy law to most women. For men rebellion is an unstoppable instinct , the more masculine you are the less respect you have for authority. You can bend and obey but are always prepared to destroy it when need be.

In a democratic system you just undermined democracy because half the population will always follow the official word.

Now a study was done showing in 500 years of history whenever 17% of the male population is dissatisfied there is always revolution, war and violence.

I know you are a woman and don't understand men, I'm telling you violence is part of the makeup of a man, like having different sexual organs, denser bones and muscles, 8 to 10 times the testosterone and associated sex drive as women.

Back to the P word ,
Most women in the West will.be begging for patriarchy when they sees their entire society unravel.

History doesn't repeat itself but rhymes
Did you know their was a femenist movement in Baghdad during late 800s at the height of abbasid golden age.

Femenism and and women in power always appear right before total disaster it's a sign of things ending.

Sparta was always more conservative and patriarchal than their rivals, due to their inheritance laws widows ammased practically all the wealth and controlled the entire economy then moved on to political power.
Sparta had 2 Kings and by the time of its fall
Both Kings were effectively ruled by a council of women who own all the land ,trade and wealth.

 

[gasara]

Abrahamfreedom is one of the most entertaining characters on this forum; I genuinely chuckle when he puts his little flights of fancy into emission

His name has me in tears Abdi to Abraham help

 

[Angelina]

There goes that P word again, patriarchy
Blaming men for the very structure of society . A human society can only successfully be run by men , patriarchy as you call it is the only way.

Whenever a society becomes economically prosperous and experiences long periods of peacetime you always get decadence and a shift towards "matriachy " is always the same pattern .

A matriarchal society apart from hunter gatherers and small very fringe isolated societies matriarchal societies do not exist, so what are you talking about?!

Giving power to women can always be presented as being fair and equalising things.
The reality is empowering women would be my number 1 act when I am a dictator, or part of powerful clique.
Women are psychologically enable of rebellion, whatever the official government or powers that be say becomes holy law to most women. For men rebellion is an unstoppable instinct , the more masculine you are the less respect you have for authority. You can bend and obey but are always prepared to destroy it when need be.

In a democratic system you just undermined democracy because half the population will always follow the official word.

Now a study was done showing in 500 years of history whenever 17% of the male population is dissatisfied there is always revolution, war and violence.

I know you are a woman and don't understand men, I'm telling you violence is part of the makeup of a man, like having different sexual organs, denser bones and muscles, 8 to 10 times the testosterone and associated sex drive as women.

I know a lot about men and know that a lot of that violence is pointed towards women as well so what now? A woman is in fact much more likely to be attacked and killed by the men in their families? So are you saying they need to be ok and put up with that? Woman are also the ones who get r-worded, killed and the list continues and it’s via men and woman have been suffering from that for the last 10,000 yrs as society has strictly been extremely patriarchal. You will hardly find a matriarchal societies in which women hold 60% more of wealth and leadership, even know it todays modern world that’s not the case.

You need to understand I do not have issues with Patriarchy, but I do have issues with extreme patriarchy and we can all see now that everywhere in the world that operates in an extreme manner is poor and backwards.

Back to the P word ,
Most women in the West will.be begging for patriarchy when they sees their entire society unravel.

We already live in a patriarchy although a less extreme version, the West isn’t a Matriarchy. Woman having rights doesn’t make it a matriarchy. Do you honestly believe that a woman having the same rights to education, housing means it’s matriarchy? Most in politics in the West are men, most of the owners of big companies are men and the list continues, so what the hell are you on about? Are you saying women are going to beg for not be able to get an education or get money? What exactly will they beg for?!

History doesn't repeat itself but rhymes
Did you know their was a femenist movement in Baghdad during late 800s at the height of abbasid golden age.

No, there wasn’t. Feminism as we know it has never existed in the Middle East. You’re incredibly ignorant to even believe that. Even if there was a movement of women wanting rights that had no bearing on society as they were probably a fringe group and were powerless.

Femenism and and women in power always appear right before total disaster it's a sign of things ending.

No, there has bene no case of women having full power in the last 10,000 yrs. It has never appeared before a disaster. The Romans weren’t feminist at all, most women couldn’t even inherit, even before the ‘fall of Rome’ same with Greeks.

Sparta was always more conservative and patriarchal than their rivals, due to their inheritance laws widows ammased practically all the wealth and controlled the entire economy then moved on to political power.
Sparta had 2 Kings and by the time of its fall
Both Kings were effectively ruled by a council of women who own all the land ,trade and wealth.

None of what you wrote has anything to do with the topic at hand and no Sparta was not a Matriarchy, so please get your facts correct. No society in the last 10,000 years was a Matriarchy nor do I advocate for Matriarchy. I advocate for a society in which women are given full rights.

Societies that operate in extreme patriarchy are in fact dangerous for women. They have high cases of DV, high rates of mother mortality rates, high rates of female exploitation since women can’t provide for themselves.

You have no idea of history, none and it’s hilarious to read all of that.

You simply hate women and believe that woman having education, wealth and land will mean a loss for you. You reason like a white supremacist who believes if black people were given the same rights as white people, society and white people will suffer. Zionists who are the aggressors also talk like you, despite having all the power they believe that Palis don’t deserve anything and that their society will go down hill.

Every group in power bulks at the idea of increasing right and acts like a victim, your historically inaccurate waffle is based on that. I laughed when you said the Abbaid was a feminist society towards the end. I really laughed. You know nothing of history. The undoing of the Abbasid was the Mongols and that wasn’t in the 800s and it had nothing to do with women and even towards the end it was a patriarchal society with no woman in power and slavery at an all time high most of whom.

Instead of wasting your time posting here, get an education and not the redpill kind. You’re probably a fool who will blame Somalis undoing on ‘Matriarchy’! It’s the women! If you give them the right to hold a pencil we will all suffer