100 Al Shabab killed in U.S Trump airstrikes

[Ferrari]

"Documents detailing a special operations campaign in northeastern Afghanistan, Operation Haymaker, show that between January 2012 and February 2013, U.S. special operations airstrikes killed more than 200 people. Of those, only 35 were the intended targets. During one five-month period of the operation, according to the documents, nearly 90 percent of the people killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets. In Yemen and Somalia, where the U.S. has far more limited intelligence capabilities to confirm the people killed are the intended targets, the equivalent ratios may well be much worse. "

 

[Iftiin]

s are dead inside. I would struggle to consider them human beings.

 

[Loriox]

why wouldn't they apply? There are stats available that under obama, who was much more intelligent than Trump, drone strikes took out civilians 90% of the time. Since obama, left, Trump has increased drone strikes by 400% . I'd guess there is even a higher number of drones hitting civilians.

Didn't he kill an 8 year old girl and her brother in Yemen with his first drone strike? What do you get from ignoring the facts?

I never ignored facts, I just stated that they're often skewed and your nearly decade old Obama drone estimates aren't relevant to this attack. But you're clearly too emotional and sexually frustrated to think clearly.

And isn't Al-Shabab responsible for murdering, raping, and displacing millions of people? But noooooo one or two innocent people must be preserved so we must let these terrorists run free.

 

[Ferrari]

I never ignored facts, I just stated that they're often skewed and your nearly decade old Obama drone estimates aren't relevant to this attack. But you're clearly too emotional and sexually frustrated to think clearly.

And isn't Al-Shabab responsible for murdering, raping, and displacing millions of people? But noooooo one or two innocent people must be preserved so we must let these terrorists run free.

Again it's not one or two innocent people, not that, that would justify the indiscriminate bombings that innocent civilians, in the middle of drought receive. 9 out 10 people who die from drone strikes are innocent civilians. Are you dumb? Do you not understand simple ratios? 9 out of the 10 people killed are innocent civilians. Does that look handful to you?

Obama's drones are relevant because he was bombing somalia on his last day in office. If under obama, civilian casualty was that high, what do you suppose it is under trump, who btw, has increased drone strikes by over 430% ?

Again let me quote you the study they did and tell me it's a hand full of people for the greater good again.

"Documents detailing a special operations campaign in northeastern Afghanistan, Operation Haymaker, show that between January 2012 and February 2013, U.S. special operations airstrikes killed more than 200 people. Of those, only 35 were the intended targets. During one five-month period of the operation, according to the documents, nearly 90 percent of the people killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets. In Yemen and Somalia, where the U.S. has far more limited intelligence capabilities to confirm the people killed are the intended targets, the equivalent ratios may well be much worse. ""

 

[Iftiin]

Brother you are speaking to a creature that is worse than an animal!

There is no reasoning with s. Imagine what evil it takes to be a - it's unimaginable!

 

[Loriox]

Again it's not one or two innocent people, not that, that would justify the indiscriminate bombings that innocent civilians, in the middle of drought receive. 9 out 10 people who die from drone strikes are innocent civilians. Are you dumb? Do you not understand simple ratios? 9 out of the 10 people killed are innocent civilians. Does that look handful to you?

Obama's drones are relevant because he was bombing somalia on his last day in office. If under obama, civilian casualty was that high, what do you suppose it is under trump, who btw, has increased drone strikes by over 430% ?

Again let me quote you the study they did and tell me it's a hand full of people for the greater good again.

"Documents detailing a special operations campaign in northeastern Afghanistan, Operation Haymaker, show that between January 2012 and February 2013, U.S. special operations airstrikes killed more than 200 people. Of those, only 35 were the intended targets. During one five-month period of the operation, according to the documents, nearly 90 percent of the people killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets. In Yemen and Somalia, where the U.S. has far more limited intelligence capabilities to confirm the people killed are the intended targets, the equivalent ratios may well be much worse. ""

The one or two people instance was in response to the 8 year old Yemeni that you bought. And you're still being naive and bringing up these old stats that have nothing to do with this airstrike AS I STATED AT LEAST 10 TIMES.

@Iftiin Go back to your main account or gay collection, no one is paying you any attention.

 

[random12345]

The one or two people instance was in response to the 8 year old Yemeni that you bought. And you're still being naive and bringing up these old stats that have nothing to do with this airstrike AS I STATED AT LEAST 10 TIMES.

@Iftiin Go back to your main account or gay collection, no one is paying you any attention.

You're impossible. Nothing to do with this strike kulaha, I'll dumb it down for you since you're too prideful to accept you're wrong. It's not as though every strike will need stats, we don't have that luxury. That's why we have averages. The averages in this case being 9:10 civilians. Unless they wanted to be super special this time even after new laws relaxing limits on civilian deaths? It's like a restaurant, very cheap, having a reputation for not washing their hands. Then assuming that they washed their hands for your food since there's no proof. The stats are there but keep deluding yourself you self hating khaniis.

 

[TSP]

Bismillah

You're impossible. Nothing to do with this strike kulaha, I'll dumb it down for you since you're too prideful to accept you're wrong. It's not as though every strike will need stats, we don't have that luxury. That's why we have averages. The averages in this case being 9:10 civilians. Unless they wanted to be super special this time even after new laws relaxing limits on civilian deaths? It's like a restaurant, very cheap, having a reputation for not washing their hands. Then assuming that they washed their hands for your food since there's no proof. The stats are there but keep deluding yourself you self hating khaniis.

beautiful analogy sxb

 

[Iftiin]

He's not self hating because he is not one of us!

Khaniis go to Hell!