AIOPZ
Pan-Islamist
This is why I don't trust people who always shit on Arabs. Y'all niggas are almost always also anti-Islam. Are you implying that it's somehow better to force women not to wear the hijab?? Audubillah.
An Arabic script is better than Osmanya. Facts.
- Thread starter A_A
- Start date
- Status
This is why I don't trust people who always shit on Arabs. Y'all niggas are almost always also anti-Islam. Are you implying that it's somehow better to force women not to wear the hijab?? Audubillah.
Both are bad in my opinion. Religion shouldn't be shoved down peoples throat and women should have the freedom to choose whether they want to wear Hijab or not.
I wasn't not implying anything I was drawing a parallel between Iran under Shah and Iran now.
A_A
Islamic Fanfiction Writer
A: Oil, literally oil. Look it up, TLDR Reza was a stingy guy. The oil was the main factor.
Plus so what about the hijab??? Female literacy rates were higher after the revolution then during the shahs time. I can take off my hijab and claim modernity, but if I can’t even read then wtf?
A_A
Islamic Fanfiction Writer
He was talking about Britain invading neutral Iran.Warr, women are being FORCED to wear the hijab. Maad walantahay? people like you, hate on shah for suppressing peoples right to practising religion but are acting nonchalant when it comes to forcing Islamic practices down peoples throat. women pre- Iran revolution had more freedom then than now.
AIOPZ
Pan-Islamist
Waryaa, besides women not having to wear the hijab, what exactly about pre-1979 Iran are you defending? All of your arguments are just "hijab, hijab, hijab."
A_A
Islamic Fanfiction Writer
A:
B: Hijab in Iran is another topic. We are talking about Saudi Arabia and Iran. Try to stay on the topic.
C. I neither support or dislike the Shah or the Islamic leaders of today’s Iran. Please don’t make assumptions.
D. I said “What about the hijab?” Because the hijab has nothing to do with Anglo Soviet invasion. I was more confused.
E. Yes it is true women had more freedoms, but a lower literacy rate. That’s just sad honestly. I would like to stay on topic please.
Other then that I believe that is all. Saudi Arabia did not influence the Islamic Revolution. It was the Shahs fault.
I am not defending pre- '79 Iran rather I was calling out your hypocrisy. You shame Shah for suppressing religion (rightfully so) but downplay the current governments' suppression of freedom. Irani women weren't even allowed to attend soccer match until recently.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/spor...e-years/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2894113897e8
A:
B: Hijab in Iran is another topic. We are talking about Saudi Arabia and Iran. Try to stay on the topic.
C. I neither support or dislike the Shah or the Islamic leaders of today’s Iran. Please don’t make assumptions.
D. I said “What about the hijab?” Because the hijab has nothing to do with Anglo Soviet invasion. I was more confused.
E. Yes it is true women had more freedoms, but a lower literacy rate. That’s just sad honestly. I would like to stay on topic please.
Other then that I believe that is all. Saudi Arabia did not influence the Islamic Revolution. It was the Shahs fault.
WTF
I am staying on the subject. YOU started by asking "SO WHAT ABOUT THE HIJAB". I brought up the hijab at first to draw a comparison by both governments and to show that they both were extreme. Kulaha I would like to stay on topic when YOU changed it
And your welcome for the Trending thread BTW
A_A
Islamic Fanfiction Writer
Actully I believe you started it. I was replying “So what about the hijab from your earlier. Here I’ll quote it.WTF
I am staying on the subject. YOU started by asking "SO WHAT ABOUT THE HIJAB". I brought up the hijab at first to draw a comparison by both governments and to show that they both were extreme. Kulaha I would like to stay on topic when YOU changed it
And your welcome for the Trending thread BTW
You see what I mean? It went from Anglo Soviet invasion to hijab. It’s why I said what I said. A little misunderstanding is all it is.
Oh is it trending? Thank you![/QUOTE]
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
I was just drawing a comparison.
" why would westerners fight against Secular Iran ( Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran) and Exile Shah just for Iran to turn to the extreme opposite. Iran right now is suppressing Irani women's right to choose to wear a head veil (Hijab). How is that different from shah's rhetoric?"
A_A
Islamic Fanfiction Writer
I think I explain why the invasion happened so I’ll skip that. It is no different. Though I highly doubt Arabs had anything to do with the Islamic Revolution. With the way things are going in Iran I won’t be surprised if people rise up, again. If you oppress people, they get pissed off. The thing is you can’t push the limit. The Shah failed and now the same might happen to the current government.
Again highly doubt Saudi Arabia had anything to due with it.
Timo Jareer and proud
2nd Emir of the Akh Right Movement
Wadaad is better.
A_A
Islamic Fanfiction Writer
Samaalic Era
QurboExit
Any Somali script will do except Wadaad We have to be creative and original
Timo Jareer and proud
2nd Emir of the Akh Right Movement
Wadaad is much better and will be much more easier for Somali kids to learn Quran.
We have been using it in the north from 1300-colonazation. It's way older then the other ones too, (would not want to write in a script that's not even a century year old.)
Samaalic Era
QurboExit
Its a good script but its lack the Somali touch. A writing system should promote the national identity
Timo Jareer and proud
2nd Emir of the Akh Right Movement
National identity = Arab baby daddies.
- Status
Trending
-
-
Danish journalist cites a racist Danish Quran burner who said, "The average IQ of a Somali is 68, and the average IQ of an orangutan is 69,"- Started by Fobnimo Till I Dhimo
- Replies: 48
