AIOPZ
Pan-Islamist
And again, Iran then and Iran now are polar opposites. One banned hijab and one force[d] it!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70b98/70b988226da878383662b7878578842911be489f" alt="drake nah :nahgirl: :nahgirl:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70b98/70b988226da878383662b7878578842911be489f" alt="drake nah :nahgirl: :nahgirl:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70b98/70b988226da878383662b7878578842911be489f" alt="drake nah :nahgirl: :nahgirl:"
And again, Iran then and Iran now are polar opposites. One banned hijab and one force[d] it!
This is why I don't trust people who always shit on Arabs. Y'all niggas are almost also anti-Islam. Are you implying that it's somehow better to force women not to wear the hijab?? Audubillah.
A: Oil, literally oil. Look it up, TLDR Reza was a stingy guy. The oil was the main factor.It doesn't matter that they were trading with Nazi Germany because they didn't agree with the Nazis and took in a bunch of jews into Iran.
The Iranian government did not support the antisemitism of Nazis.[2][4]Iranian embassies in European capitals occupied by the Germans, rescued over 1,500 Jews and secretly granted them Iranian citizenship, allowing them to move to Iran.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Soviet_invasion_of_Iran
And again, Iran then and Iran now are polar opposites. One banned hijab and one force it!
This is literally only conspiracy; can you give me any solid evidence of Saudi Arabia engaging in the overthrown of Shah besides "those mean arabz?"
A: Oil, literally oil. Look it up, TLDR Reza was a stingy guy. The oil was the main factor.
Plus so what about the hijab??? Female literacy rates were higher after the revolution then during the shahs time. I can take off my hijab and claim modernity, but if I can’t even read then wtf?
Warr, women are being FORCED to wear the hijab. Maad walantahay? people like you, hate on shah for suppressing peoples right to practising religion but are acting nonchalant when it comes to forcing Islamic practices down peoples throat. women pre- Iran revolution had more freedom then than now.
A:Warr, women are being FORCED to wear the hijab. Maad walantahay? people like you, hate on shah for suppressing peoples right to practising religion but are acting nonchalant when it comes to forcing Islamic practices down peoples throat. women pre- Iran revolution had more freedom then than now.
Waryaa, besides women not having to wear the hijab, what exactly about pre-1979 Iran are you defending? All of your arguments are just "hijab, hijab, hijab."
A:
B: Hijab in Iran is another topic. We are talking about Saudi Arabia and Iran. Try to stay on the topic.
C. I neither support or dislike the Shah or the Islamic leaders of today’s Iran. Please don’t make assumptions.
D. I said “What about the hijab?” Because the hijab has nothing to do with Anglo Soviet invasion. I was more confused.
E. Yes it is true women had more freedoms, but a lower literacy rate. That’s just sad honestly. I would like to stay on topic please.
Other then that I believe that is all. Saudi Arabia did not influence the Islamic Revolution. It was the Shahs fault.
WTFA: Oil, literally oil. Look it up, TLDR Reza was a stingy guy. The oil was the main factor.
Plus so what about the hijab??? Female literacy rates were higher after the revolution then during the shahs time. I can take off my hijab and claim modernity, but if I can’t even read then wtf?
Actully I believe you started it. I was replying “So what about the hijab from your earlier. Here I’ll quote it.WTF
I am staying on the subject. YOU started by asking "SO WHAT ABOUT THE HIJAB". I brought up the hijab at first to draw a comparison by both governments and to show that they both were extreme. Kulaha I would like to stay on topic when YOU changed it
And your welcome for the Trending thread BTW![]()
You see what I mean? It went from Anglo Soviet invasion to hijab. It’s why I said what I said. A little misunderstanding is all it is.It would make sense if it was for political reasons. They would rather have an Islamic (Shia) Iran than a secular Iran. I mean, why would westerners fight against Secular Iran ( Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran) and Exile Shah just for Iran to turn to the extreme opposite. Iran right now is suppressing Irani womens right to choose to wear a head veil (Hijab). How is that different from shah's rhetoric?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I think I explain why the invasion happened so I’ll skip that. It is no different. Though I highly doubt Arabs had anything to do with the Islamic Revolution. With the way things are going in Iran I won’t be surprised if people rise up, again. If you oppress people, they get pissed off. The thing is you can’t push the limit. The Shah failed and now the same might happen to the current government.I was just drawing a comparison.
" why would westerners fight against Secular Iran ( Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran) and Exile Shah just for Iran to turn to the extreme opposite. Iran right now is suppressing Irani women's right to choose to wear a head veil (Hijab). How is that different from shah's rhetoric?"
Wadaad is better.Osmanya is much better since it has letters meant exclusively for the Somali language, and is easier to learn compared to the others.
Wadaad is better.
Wadaad is better.
Wadaad is much better and will be much more easier for Somali kids to learn Quran.Any Somali script will do except Wadaad We have to be creative and original
Wadaad is much better and will be much more easier for Somali kids to learn Quran.
We have been using it in the north from 1300-colonazation. It's way older then the other ones too, (would not want to write in a script that's not even a century year old.)
National identity = Arab baby daddies.Its a good script but its lack the Somali touch. A writing system should promote the national identity