Your probably running the samples wrong.You can go on Vahaduo and check the distances, they’re closest to Ethiopians and Eritreans. That Ethio Semitic and “Omotic” ancestry helps actually
What’s hard to understand about early pastoralists being closest to Ethios/Eris?
You are free to run the samples yourself, go right ahead and share the results with us.
Do we have more than two samples showing this? I get what you are saying but my issue is that these tools are all just regression analysis based on statistical methods dressed up as something else. No different to econometrics. I don’t think most people here understand that. If we have such tiny sample sizes how can you say what they represent?
No not all. I was born in the good old USA. What about my typing would make you think I was a fob ?
No we only have 2 samples, qpadm as far as I am aware does not use regression analyses.
Exactly it's probably the samples.
They could’ve taken the Red Sea route, either way it doesn’t matter what’s likely or unlikely the truth is the early pastoralists/Nubians were more Eurasian than the later ones. We have genetic and physical data to support this.
Is it the words ? Sometimes when I'm talking to my teenaged brothers they tell me I use too many "big words" .
It’s absolutely based on regression analysis sxb, if you don’t know it just say so. I recognized it the moment I saw it since I took a few post-grad stats courses. They aren’t calling it regression but it is absolutely based off that and used in many fields under different names. The only difference is though you would be very careful with such small sample sizes in those other fields but here since it’s such a niche it’s not as rigorous. Still the same pitfalls though.
The odds they somehow went the red sea route is a lot lower than them just migrating down.
Imagine you have two Somali samples. One of them is reer xamar and one is an ethnic Somali but you don’t really know this. You then extrapolate based on these 2 samples onto the entire Somali population making sweeping proclamations that Somalis are closer to Pakistanis or have small amounts of bantu admixture. I’m not saying this is what’s happening here but it’s a real possibility whenever you have such minuscule sample sizes. Since we are talking about ancient dna and there is so little to work with in the first place and it’s such a niche this is more accepted.
This will be quite the feast, i've been reading your posts on anthromadness since 2017 man didn't realise you were the same guy
How similar were the lower egyptians and the nubians in regards to their eurasian-african ratio?
