Let them have fun manSomalis on twitter are already We Wuzzing
That answer was specifically about Cognitives' question about the possibility of Keynan IA pastoralist migration into Nubia or some contact between those people. Saharans did exist. Though doubt is mixed as extant Nara and Kunama.Nara? Kunama? They were at least on the peripheries.
The low SNP count makes me hesitant about saying anything conclusive about the ZAF and Mbuti %. Though, I have potential ideas if they are true.Alchemist, yet again, vindicated.
...kinda. Done some prelim runs using the simulated coordinates and this fellow is very, very Omotic. Kinda Pygmy? Kinda San too. Idk what to make of it. Low coverage and simulated, I know, but yh.
Beni Amer are 2/3 Cushitic and 1/3 Arabian. Even the Habesha and Northern Horners (Agaws,Sahos,Afars) are more Cushitic then themWhy is it that somalis are a better model for this sample? Is it because we're closely related or could it be that somalis are overall a better model for proto-cushites? Also is this similar to the beni amer who appears to be closely related to somalis?
Then what is this about the sheared ancestry component? Also if beni amer are 1/3 arabian wouldn't they cluster with habesha who are more eurasian shifted than somalis?Beni Amer are 2/3 Cushitic and 1/3 Arabian. Even the Habesha and Northern Horners (Agaws,Sahos,Afars) are more Cushitic then them
That Beni Amer sample your referring to is not representative, the avg Beni Amer is barely more Eurasian than HabeshaBeni Amer are 2/3 Cushitic and 1/3 Arabian. Even the Habesha and Northern Horners (Agaws,Sahos,Afars) are more Cushitic then them
They do, Beja are closer to Habesha than they are to Nubians and Sudani Arabs evenThen what is this about the sheared ancestry component? Also if beni amer are 1/3 arabian wouldn't they cluster with habesha who are more eurasian shifted than somalis?
Still it's curios to see this. It'd be great if we get a proper explanation for this. The admixture happened between 2000-2500 years ago which neatly coincides with E-Y18629. This might be referring to a branch of E-Y18629 that stayed in sudan.That Beni Amer sample your referring to is not representative, the avg Beni Amer is barely more Eurasian than Habesha
Why would the Beni Amer plot with Habeshas & Northern Cushitic speakers when the Beni Amer are more Arabian and therefore more Eurasian than them?Then what is this about the sheared ancestry component? Also if beni amer are 1/3 arabian wouldn't they cluster with habesha who are more eurasian shifted than somalis?
I meant in relation to somalis. As you said somalis are relatively speaking less eurasion than habesha so beni amer and habesha would be closer to each other than somalis and beni amer.Why would the Beni Amer plot with Habeshas & Northern Cushitic speakers when the Beni Amer are more Arabian and therefore more Eurasian than them?
Somalis are the least Arabian and therefore more Sub-Saharan then most Horner groups
Maybe the first historical mention of Somalis being an ethnic group only dates back to the mid-Middle Ages ?These hating ass cadaans, why can't they just say he's Somali when it's clear that he is.
Also life was shit in those days, dying so young.
The word Somali goes back to the 7-8th century.Maybe the first historical mention of Somalis being an ethnic group only dates back to the mid-Middle Ages ?
Didnβt see Somali written in ThereThe word Somali goes back to the 7-8th century.
Did you even read the thread?Didnβt see Somali written in There
BarelyDid you even read the thread?
Join the Roman larp, donβt mind all the detailsBarely
Nah Iβm just trolling. My point was just that Somalis were never mentioned per name until fairly recently in written history. Wewuzzing this random eastern African lost in roman Balkans and calling him Somali is just crazy to me kkkkk
I don't think the Somali identity as we know it today was a thing 2000 years ago, or even a 1000 years ago. Think of it like the germanic tribes roaming around north and western europe 2000 years ago, they were related, and spoke a close enough mutually intelligible languages, but they were never united as one group until much later. Somalis 2000 years ago definitely did exist as DNA proves that, but we probably existed as independent groups, in pockets, and we were proper laangaab.Maybe the first historical mention of Somalis being an ethnic group only dates back to the mid-Middle Ages ?