I would rather be a Ciyaal Casir than see this embarrassment
Macrobian nationalists on Twitter after discovering this threadIt never began for us to begin with
I would rather be a Ciyaal Casir than see this embarrassment
Macrobian nationalists on Twitter after discovering this threadIt never began for us to begin with
Craziest plotwist in any form of mediaYou don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Somalia is pretty urbanised so you have a lot of empty land with villages, towns and cities. These cities have people who are doing wellHorta what got me tripped up is the fact yemeni and oromo qoxootis are pouring into a country with the lowest HDI levels on the planet. What are you doing begging these niggas? Especially for the Oromos
Yeah, yeah usual high-IQ analysis waffle from you.If the quality of life were decent for self-perceived life satisfaction, without proper functioning institutions, HDI would be registered as low regardless. These indexes serve a practical purpose but set biases for a narrow developmental chain that says anything beyond that pathway is misery not worth living.
Then you have to question why nations with high HDI have high suicide rates, wide drug problems, citizens susceptible to hedonistic industries, and why people feel a sense of meaning is lacking in their lives despite their earnings relatively surpassing the norm and they live relatively long lives. Why are people psychologically damaged, and neurotic for drama toward societal issues? Social problems are building, there are debates about what a man and a woman are, if humans can identify as animals, etc. I can go on and on.
It seems that high HDI can never be a proxy for human values of what good living means. It does not mean HDI does not have important aspects to it but even the way, let us say, education is framed, is strictly institutional, not really how education elevates the mind of a person. Just how good is the human capital as a human resource for a nation, thus education is not centered toward the human but the systemic functions.
This concept is strictly socio-economic and "open-society" oriented. It brings with it a lot of baggage where if we assume those value judgments are a given, will always result in people striving to build similar societies. I don't think homogenizing the economic and societal trajectory bodes well for humanity.
I think it is a valid criticism to say that HDI is an honest attempt to fix problems through certain imperfect world perspectives and that it solves a lot of serious problems with regard to somatic healthcare standards even hereditary ones, for example. But I think the systems that are built lack long-term durability/resiliency. Why is there a strong correlation between suicide rate increase, rise in drug and prescription drug dependencies, and so-called human happiness indexes? There is something fundamental about these systems that breaks the human spirit on a collective basis.
Either way, you cannot scientifically measure happiness in the first place. What you have is already chosen values that one tries to objectively measure through quite subjective and biased indicators.
Yeah, yeah usual high-IQ analysis waffle from you.
Let's talk about your new profile picture and how trash it is compared to your old one.
Bring it back, like who tf is even that, Elliot from Mr Robot?
View attachment 325029
View attachment 325028
If the quality of life were decent for self-perceived life satisfaction, without proper functioning institutions, HDI would be registered as low regardless. These indexes serve a practical purpose but set biases for a narrow developmental chain that says anything beyond that pathway is misery not worth living.
Then you have to question why nations with high HDI have high suicide rates, wide drug problems, citizens susceptible to hedonistic industries, and why people feel a sense of meaning is lacking in their lives despite their earnings relatively surpassing the norm and they live relatively long lives. Why are people psychologically damaged, and neurotic for drama toward societal issues? Social problems are building, there are debates about what a man and a woman are, if humans can identify as animals, etc. I can go on and on.
It seems that high HDI can never be a proxy for human values of what good living means. It does not mean HDI does not have important aspects to it but even the way, let us say, education is framed, is strictly institutional, not really how education elevates the mind of a person. Just how good is the human capital as a human resource for a nation, thus education is not centered toward the human but the systemic functions.
This concept is strictly socio-economic and "open-society" oriented. It brings with it a lot of baggage where if we assume those value judgments are a given, will always result in people striving to build similar societies. I don't think homogenizing the economic and societal trajectory bodes well for humanity.
I think it is a valid criticism to say that HDI is an honest attempt to fix problems through certain imperfect world perspectives and that it solves a lot of serious problems with regard to somatic healthcare standards even hereditary ones, for example. But I think the systems that are built lack long-term durability/resiliency. Why is there a strong correlation between suicide rate increase, rise in drug and prescription drug dependencies, and so-called human happiness indexes? There is something fundamental about these systems that breaks the human spirit on a collective basis.
Either way, you cannot scientifically measure happiness in the first place. What you have is already chosen values that one tries to objectively measure through quite subjective and biased indicators.
Because Kenya is a safe place to invest. Who wants to get extorted by a terrorist group in Somalia?Kkkk they too busy building mansions and skyscrapers in kenya looool
Stop coping. It's over bro.If the quality of life were decent for self-perceived life satisfaction, without proper functioning institutions, HDI would be registered as low regardless. These indexes serve a practical purpose but set biases for a narrow developmental chain that says anything beyond that pathway is misery not worth living.
Then you have to question why nations with high HDI have high suicide rates, wide drug problems, citizens susceptible to hedonistic industries, and why people feel a sense of meaning is lacking in their lives despite their earnings relatively surpassing the norm and they live relatively long lives. Why are people psychologically damaged, and neurotic for drama toward societal issues? Social problems are building, there are debates about what a man and a woman are, if humans can identify as animals, etc. I can go on and on.
It seems that high HDI can never be a proxy for human values of what good living means. It does not mean HDI does not have important aspects to it but even the way, let us say, education is framed, is strictly institutional, not really how education elevates the mind of a person. Just how good is the human capital as a human resource for a nation, thus education is not centered toward the human but the systemic functions.
This concept is strictly socio-economic and "open-society" oriented. It brings with it a lot of baggage where if we assume those value judgments are a given, will always result in people striving to build similar societies. I don't think homogenizing the economic and societal trajectory bodes well for humanity.
I think it is a valid criticism to say that HDI is an honest attempt to fix problems through certain imperfect world perspectives and that it solves a lot of serious problems with regard to somatic healthcare standards even hereditary ones, for example. But I think the systems that are built lack long-term durability/resiliency. Why is there a strong correlation between suicide rate increase, rise in drug and prescription drug dependencies, and so-called human happiness indexes? There is something fundamental about these systems that breaks the human spirit on a collective basis.
Either way, you cannot scientifically measure happiness in the first place. What you have is already chosen values that one tries to objectively measure through quite subjective and biased indicators.
Macrobian nationalists on Twitter after discovering this thread
Id just ropemaxx if I was constantly surrounded by dumbassesropemaxxing is the only option for somalicels... it's over for us View attachment 325030
It's been this way for over 30 years now lol. Most of us weren't even born when the civil war startedOld news, I thought you guys would be used to being a shithole by now.