Also what's the difference between k-10 and k12? Why is ethio-somali not shown in in the two upper graphs but is present in the last one? Is it like a time difference or something?
Do you think Somalis are mixed or pure?
- Thread starter Pastoralite
- Start date
Cause if we consider K10 somalis are 60 %subsaharan and 40% westeurasian.
But if we consider K12 we are majority ethio-somali and if this component is non african then the graph on the bottom shows us as predominately non-african which can't be true
Halimo-2018
VIP
Ugh another one
This happened during the neolithic period, so I ain't one of those guys who think we're caucasoid and shit. I'm just answering some damn questions lol.Ugh another one
Somalis and all other cushites are mixed nilotic-natufian-ancient CushiticI’ve heard multiple opinions regarding this subject, I personally think we’re a pure unique race aboriginal to the hornkhoisans look black and asian but they’re pure so I don’t see why we gotta be a different case, I’m not gonna let an cadaan or ****** that didn’t wash their xaar this morning tell me I’m mixed with bantu and arab
I’ve seen half bantu half arabs they look nothing like us
what do you guys think?
Ok so which one is more accurate? K10 or K12?
Is the ethio-somali component counted as african or westeurasian?
Habeshas are 50-50 african and eurasian , while Somalis have 60african and 40 westeurasian. If i understood correctly our 60 african is ethio-somali (which has westeurasian origins)+ nilosaharian while habeshas have less nilosaharian , less ethio-somali but more omotic which makes somalis and habeshas similar in their african and westeurasian ancestry with the only difference that we seem less westeurasian than them because ethio-somali is counted as african since it's found only in africa. Is it correct?
According to several papers most of the non-african component in Horners comes from the so called ethio-somali component. If we look at the graph 10 somalis have more nilosaharian than habeshas/oromos but they have. But if we go to graph 12 somalis are slightly more nilosaharian than habeshas buy also have more Ethio-somali(which is non-african) than any other horner groups. At graph 12 habeshas and Oromos also shoe more ethiopic(omotic) ancestry.
I have a few questions.
Whats the difference between K 10 and K12 and what does K+(insert number) mean in population genetics?
Habeshas are more arabian, but also more omotic while we have more nilosaharian but more Ethio-somali.
At the end of the day who is more Subsaharan african somalis or habesha?
Basically i would appreciate if anyone could help me understand what this graph is about and the difference between 10-11-12 sections
I
I have a few questions.
Whats the difference between K 10 and K12 and what does K+(insert number) mean in population genetics?
Habeshas are more arabian, but also more omotic while we have more nilosaharian but more Ethio-somali.
At the end of the day who is more Subsaharan african somalis or habesha?
Basically i would appreciate if anyone could help me understand what this graph is about and the difference between 10-11-12 sections
I
According to this somalis have close to 40% west euradiam while habeshas have about 50% .
What is the rest of our ancestry? Are we 60,% Subsaharan? Is our predominant ethio-somali component counted as African?
Cause if ethio-somali is non african it means that in graph 12 above makes somali more non african than habeshas but on the other hand this other table shows habeshas as having more westeurasian.
What is this all about?,
What is the rest of our ancestry? Are we 60,% Subsaharan? Is our predominant ethio-somali component counted as African?
Cause if ethio-somali is non african it means that in graph 12 above makes somali more non african than habeshas but on the other hand this other table shows habeshas as having more westeurasian.
What is this all about?,
The ethio-somali component is a mix of west eurasian and african. It's basically a autosomal grouping for horners.According to this somalis have close to 40% west euradiam while habeshas have about 50% .
What is the rest of our ancestry? Are we 60,% Subsaharan? Is our predominant ethio-somali component counted as African?
Cause if ethio-somali is non african it means that in graph 12 above makes somali more non african than habeshas but on the other hand this other table shows habeshas as having more westeurasian.
What is this all about?,
If we're being frank, it's 40-60, west eurasian and african. This mix happened prehistory. Probably in the neolithic era. A group similar to natufians and the dinka were the mix. The cause was most like forced migration due to the desertification of the sahara and arabia. 5000 years ago it was green.
