Hmm how do I answer this?
Islam doesn’t ignore local culture or the ‘black experience’ as he puts it. Here are my reasonings:
2. There is even a concept called ‘Urf’ under Islamic fiqh that examines people’s following of local culture provided that it doesn’t go against Islamic principles. Classical scholars talk about this in-detail. The fact that we even have a concept called ‘Urf’ is a stark example as to how local culture is allowed.
3. There is nothing in Islam to suggest that one has to dress like an Arab. This is something that modern Muslims like to enforce. Many non Arab Muslims hail from backgrounds that have been Muslim for centuries and have developed their own dress separate to Arabs for most of their history whilst retaining their deen. The fact that one can see the differences in traditional/historical dress with regard's to a Pakistani, a Malaysian, Somali and Saudi who are all indeed part of the wider Muslim Ummah illustrates my points.
3. The eating comment is rather bizarre, Muslim nations all have different cuisines. A Muslim Bangali doesn’t eat the same foods as a Yemeni for instance.
4. People can still be Muslim and have a heavily Yoruba culture and name, people can still be Muslim and be called Thomas and identify with English Anglo culture to the T minus the haram aspects and still be Muslim and an Englishmen to boot.
5. Dr Umar, is talking from a standpoint that looks at modern Muslims and their obsession with all things Arab. We know live in a rather globalized world that peddles conformity. This wasn’t the case less than 50 yrs ago. In today’s current climate, we have non Arabs co-opting the Thowb, practicing Arab culture and have completely thrown out their native dress and habits. This isn’t actually Islamically ordained and you only really see that in last few decades in the West who regard piousness= Arab particularly Khaleeji culture.