Islamically he has to provide her with the lifestyle he lives. If he lives a rich lifestyle he has to provide that .
Many rich guys live below there means so that wouldn't be an issue plus keep in mind aslong as she's happy with what she's being provided then it doesn't really need to match his and if she isn't aware then she basically won't ever complain. I don't advocate for hiding in the first place it's just that people already do this and it's somewhat immoral but not Islamically wrong except for the hiding part which can cause inheritance problems later. That's also a problem when it comes to anything being hidden from someone you should be trusting. It may not be exactly a problem from an Islamic point of view but its definitely not advisable and definitely not something the prophet would do. So the same applies to marrying multiple women in secret I agree with the points brought up for that because that's the point I'm trying to make.
It’s already sadaqa on the wife for choosing to chip in, so I don’t see how traditionalism or lack thereof has a thing to do with it. He’s already benefiting and on top of that, you seem to be arguing that since she’s already giving him some of her money he should have more access or more info?!
You can’t say that Islamic arguments are out of the window. Since Islamically a woman chipping in isn’t haram and she can always refuse to continue chipping in. Scholars have said it’s her choice, so why are you trying to suggest that once a woman helps her husband she forfeits her original Islamic rights?
Do you hear yourself?
Yes I do hear myself. That's all in the context of two traditional individuals getting married. A woman who choses to follow Islam In how it's meant to be followed probably doesn't have that many work opportunities. a trad guy won't marry a non trad woman in the first place. She's sinning by being in a mixed workforce when she's being provided for adequately. so by default she's probably not married to a trad guy so the foundation of the relationship is non traditional and based off whatever they agreed upon in the talking stage.
Yes it can transform into a traditional one but if there not on the same page when they want to do that then they are gonna butt heads and the relationship will fall apart. The only people who complain about these issues are people who semi traditional/pick and choose.
A traditional woman with a traditional man can tell the guy without issue that she has a lot of money and he will still provide as usual because they came into the relationship on those principles and she doesn't see her chipping in as contributing rather as sadaq which she can give whenever she wants. It's not something he expects her to contribute because it's not a 50/50 relationship where there is an explicit or implicit agreement of contribution.
Regardless either of them can stop contributing at any point because of Islam. I never said they forfeit there rights. I just said that she's picking and chosing when she wants to follow Islam and when she doesn't.
No, because those women in 50/50 relationships can opt out anytime in an Islamic wedding contract. They’re not gaal and aren’t bound by this. Islamically a woman can choose to give her husband 50% and the next month she can withdraw it, so what now?
That's my point there not gaal yet chose to live there lives as if they are in gaal relationship with like minded people. A person who operates like that is gonna have issues if they haven't agreed upon this sort of arangement with there partners and you can't hold each other to account since you don't really play be the books so there more likely to involve the gaal legal system.
Once again I don't believe in 50/50 relationship so these questions don't really matter to me I'm not gonna be leeching or marrying a leech. I don't expect my wife to contribute and I'm going into it all with that in mind so if she chips in or doesn't it doesn't really matter and won't have an effect on our life.
From prior convos you have spoken alot about pooling and working together and building financially together etc that's called contributing because he can't provide (providing means there is no impact on your lifesyle if you stop chipping in)
Marrying a non trad guy who can't provide by himself is going to obviously be blindsided if you randomly stop giving your share in your partnership and it's gonna affect your relationship.
I could use the exact same argument for Pre-nups. Are you pro or against it? Be honest. I don’t think the guys here are being honest here as most of them if they were millionaires wouldn’t trust their partner 100% and thus will try and have an ironclad contract or hide some of their assets in Switzerland or whatever island.
I'm indifferent to it. My mentality is basically whatever happens, happens. Financially I don't really care to leave generational wealth if it happens then it happens. I'm only concerned about not leaving my kids/wife destitute. Plus I'm very low maintenance the stuff I like doing doesn't really require massive investments. I'm only working and most guys are aiming high so they can provide adequately enough so they can live comfortably with a family. The reason why I delay marriage is so I can provide adequately on my own so whatever she does or doesn't do is a non factor financially.
If I get screwed over who cares because I don't. I'm an open book on that front if I lose it all I can just start again. I would only have an issue if cheating was involved/my stuff is being given to another guy etc. If it's going to my kids I'm fine with that.
Anyways im not gonna be living in an area where prenups even matter so its another non issue for me. I wouldn't ask for a prenup but I'm not against it for people who live in non muslim countries. The thing is if she's trad you don't have to worry about this it's non or semi trad guys who marry non or semi trad women that cry about prenups. Which is the same story as the woman who is a multimillionaire crying about not trusting her non trad guy to not switch up once they get married.