This right here. Thank you for proving my point. Munaafaq. Guilty as charged. You support crimes against humanity in Lascanood and then accuse others of doing the same. You are not to be taken seriously. Have some shame.
Fighting in Doolow between FGS & Jubbaland troops. Somali gov accuses Ethiopian troops of 'unprovoked aggression'
- Thread starter TekNiKo
- Start date
You are just proving your ignorance.
War isn't automatically raised to that level. But you are celebrating on record civilians being burned alive. I don't think i've seen anyone else do that.
You want to twist things around and pretend to not understand but it's very clear you hold one set of standards for others and one set for yourself. I just keep it consistent.
Stop it. You support the slaughter of civilians in Lascanood and pretend it didn't happen, and you always have. Everything else you said is typical nonsense and obfuscation from you. You had this same argument recently with someone on here. Own who you are and stop playing the victim. Its pathetic.
Where?
You gonna have to provide some evidence for the things you say at some point.
I'm gonna wait for that before responding again because it's not worth my time.
Where have you provided proof for any of the things you claim? You constantly run away when confronted with hard data and facts, as you did when I confronted you with data showing Somaliland's abysmal poverty record and that it was doing worse than Puntland according to the World Bank. Nobody forced you to respond to anything, 'before responding again' kulaha. I don't buy any of your claims of genocide or war crimes and i've always been clear about that. That is the difference between me and you. I don't pick and choose.
This right here is where you are trying to get out: 'You support the deliberate targetting(sic) of civilians'. You will simply claim that what happened in Lascanood wasn't deliberate targeting of civilians. You think you are clever sxb but you are an amateur, and not even a good one.
@TheLand and @Itsnotthateasy are the two biggest liars, munaafaqs, gaslighters mental gymnasts I have seen on this forum yet. Wllhi this Olympic level mental gymnastics these two are doing on this thread.
You openly supported Bashar Al-Assad who committed much worse crimes than anything we are even debating here. Talk about munaafaq gaslighting.
I support dal xoreye Bashar Al Assad, when have I ever said something to the contrary? I'm not mental gymast like u
u deny tukeh crimes but preach about idoor attacking las canod civiliansMental gymnast? You support a murderous gaal alawite and you are proud of it just like you support murderous gaal Afweyne. Some things never changeI support dal xoreye Bashar Al Assad, when have I ever said something to the contrary? I'm not mental gymast like u
You also deny Afweyne crimes but claim Tuke is a war criminal taking orders from him. Doqon.
Yeah but it wasn't it was just a war between two groups for territority. If you can prove it then fine I accept but I don't see any proof of these things.
In your mind two groups can never fight or soemthing? This is why laws exist and these classifications exist.
Bashar Al Assad was fighting against rebranded al nusra front terrorists who are connected to Al Shabab in Somalia via Ahmed Al Shaara aka Jolani who is Al qaeda affiliate. Even AQ were celebrating fall of Assad regime, Yahuud, AQ and Jolani all celebrating ousting Al Assad is suspicious no? BTW u denu tukeh crimes but preach about idoor attacking las canod civilians both are war crimes which happened and only one u denyMental gymnast? You support a murderous gaal alawite and you are proud of it just like you support murderous gaal Afweyne. Some things never change
So then by that logic SNM vs Somali army was just a war for territory right? Can't have it both ways.
Did Siad Barre commit war crimes?
Again your memory fails you , court has accepted deliberate targetting under Tukeh took place, if you can find a similar thing then I accept until then it's just your words.
Yes.
under siyad barre many unjust crimes were committed during the Northern campaign against snm which I condemn. If u want I can give u my full opinion on the war later. I hope that suffice to answer ur queryThat case was against Tukeh as an individual and he was found civilly liable not criminally otherwise he’d have been arrested. The bar is much lower for civil cases. Your argument is very flawed and you are making leaps of logic.
It's not flawed at all. The nature of the conflicts are clearly very different/ otherwise we would have many reports of those things that Tukeh was found guilty of.
I'll leave you now because maybe you just dont' get what you don't want to get.
Go ahead and run away when you have no argument as usual. I'd expect nothing less from you.
The balance of evidence is that those things happened.
You say SL did the same without any corrobating evidence, no trial nothing. So what is there to discuss? You want a loop hole and whatever even if it went to the Hague you would find something to say.
