do u usually miss the point?
ure a kufar bc u lack comprehension of islam and the quran so miss me with ur quoting.If you have a contention with what I said then I think you've misunderstood the point of hijaab.
ure a kufar bc u lack comprehension of islam and the quran so miss me with ur quoting.
Doesn't make sense. On the one hand hijab represents modesty but on the other hand you lot are complementing their beauty - the very thing they're meant to be concealing.
The whole point is so you don't put your grimy eyes on themHijab I understand, but burqa?
In refutation of @JohnDoe’s claim…I'm pretty sure I know alot more about this deen than you do. We don't leave the religion of our forefathers on a whim. Does it take excellent "comprehension" to realise Muhammad was wrong about the sun setting in a black muddy spring?
Nope, failed. Even the sea can not produce the sight of the sun in it's entirety. We know that it's not the sun that orbits the Earth, it's actually the opposite. Lol @ your wording, it appears the tafsiirists only differed in whether it was pronounced as "Hami'a" or "Hamiyia", that was an irrelevant "point" you made there anyway. The main issue at hand is that Dhul Qarnayn (AS) has seen a reflection of the sun (NO ONE SAID THE SUN IN IT'S ENTIRETY), a snippet of it if you will. You cannot explain that hadith only with a "geocentric" model you filthy liar. First of all, the idea of the "sun setting" in of it self is completely abstract.You're the one deceiving the people but from what I see most are willing to buy into this lie.
1) The word 'bahr' which means sea isn't used rather the word 'ayn' is which means spring. The largest spring on earth will never produce the sight of the sun into the earth. Only a sea can achieve such a spectacle.
2) The first 15+ tafsiirists (first 400+ years in fact) of the Qur'an all held this view Al-Tabari attributes mentions that the controversy of the verse was that the early Muslims from Basra and Medina pronounced "Hami'ah" differently so they differed as to whether it meant the sun set in a muddy spring or a standard hot spring rather than if it set in a spring at all.
3) You can only explain the following Hadith with a geocentric (sun orbits earth) model
"…So, the prophet carried out the expedition and when he reached that town at the time or nearly at the time of the ‘Asr prayer, he said to the sun, ‘O sun! You are under Allah’s Order and I am under Allah’s Order O Allah! Stop it (i.e. the sun) from setting.’ It was stopped till Allah made him victorious…." Sahih Muslim (4:1807)
This new interpretation you propose has only come about because of the advancements in our scientific knowledge. Dhul-Qarnain was a legend that has been peddled and change throughout the generations since Late Antiquity. The Qur'an is just one of those in the chain of Chinese whisperers.
Nope, failed. Even the sea can not produce the sight of the sun in it's entirety. We know that it's not the sun that orbits the Earth, it's actually the opposite. Lol @ your wording, it appears the tafsiirists only differed in whether it was pronounced as "Hami'a" or "Hamiyia", that was an irrelevant "point" you made there anyway. The main issue at hand is that Dhul Qarnayn (AS) has seen a reflection of the sun (NO ONE SAID THE SUN IN IT'S ENTIRETY), a snippet of it if you will. You cannot explain that hadith only with a "geocentric" model you filthy liar. First of all, "the sun setting" in of it self, is an abstract term.
That hadith does not need to be explained from a heliocentric model. The idea of the sun setting is very abstract in of itself, are you retarded?Wow, talk about shifting goalposts. A spring would never achieve even a part of the sun setting. And I wouldn't put (AS) next to Dhul-Qarnain either as historical records show he was most probably based off Alexander the Great who was himself a pagan.
Explain that Hadith of Muhammad from a heliocentric model then?
That hadith does not need to be explained from a heliocentric model. The idea of the sun setting is very abstract in of itself, are you retarded?