It is not semantics bro, just stating the obvious Wallahi that both sources relate to the same trip except that his earlier letter goes into more detail unlike his later address in your web source.
Anyway, to each his own bro. Salam.
It is semantics in that you already lost the main argument and just won't admit it and act as though we are standing on equal ground and should just agree to disagree. You claimed from the outset since our DMs that Koonfur had no native Somali vessels and sailors. I showed you a source that clearly disproves this in that Mauritius one. It's over, saaxiib. Whether or not our Kirk quotes are the same even though they're dated, worded and speak of the environment completely differently and for some reason in mine he decides to say the boats are "native" like the grain is indeed semantics in respect to the main argument being had here.
You're also clearly reaching with the Reer Maanyo who are Gibil-Madow... the main point is plainly moot. And you still do not concede how unsightly you're being toward your kin and basically gassing up Arabs who have literally the same customs and culture in this case. But it's all good. Anyone onlooking will know the truth of it, I'm sure. All the best and I once again invite you to debunk whatever you believe you can debunk in the Dhow thread.
Salam!