@Shimbiris
Firstly, after you stated that we had buried the hatchet, was I aggressive? Sxb, I made a simple post where I argued that the two sources refer to one and the same trip, gave you a thumbs up and said to each his own. Your reply went off on a different tangent where you began to accuse me of self-hate etc. Why is this turning out to be a broken record? Are you having some sort of Dementia episode bro cos how does burying the hatchet and then doing a 180 by hurling insults add up? If you have a life and do not want to go back and forth surely my harmless comment warranted no reply yet you felt the need to revert back to slandering me with accusations of self-hate? Acudhubillahi!
I clearly told you in the middle of our DM that you were bringing up peninsular Arabs into the discussion and only after that did I make the Somali comparison where I was the first one to state that Arabs were only more sophisticated than us because they neighboured advanced civilisations, never argued they were savage by nature. It is all in the DM. I also again emphasised in my last post that I do not give a toss about comparisons with Arabs. It is all in there man!
I clearly took back my assumption that Gibil Cads were probably the ones engaging in sailing in the DM and here so what is there to debate regarding this? The debate here has been mainly about the Kirk source which you were denying until your previous post to this one in which you admitted I was correct. After accepting I was correct regarding the Kirk source, are you going to amend your dhow thread to reflect that the sailors docked in Mogadishu were Arab?
Sxb, I have never associated Reer Maanyo with the Gibil Cad confederation. All I have emphasised, here and in the DM, is that they are partially Somali because two of their bigger subclans have non-Somali qabil lineages. Even the Banadiri source you used in the DM regarding who the Reer Maanyo are does not contradict my statement that they were only partially Somali. Why should I or anyone else ignore the non-Somali ancestry of Ba Mukhtar and Shawesh Bin Ali found in the Reer Maanyo when it is also common knowledge that clans such as the Shaanshi, Hatimi, Qalinshube in other Gibil Madoow clans also do not belong to Somali qabil lineages?
You are again engaging in slander. In the DM, I never claimed that Isaaqs never sailed. All I argued was that the Majeerten in comparison to the Isaaq and Warsangeli were the most advanced Somali sailing dynasty in recent recorded history, and that the ancestors of Somalis probably sailed as far back as the Barbaroi. This is exactly what I said:
I also made subsequent DM posts in which I stated that the Warsangeli sailed before the 19th century and referenced the story of Suldaan Cali Dableh who is reputedly one of the earliest examples of firearms being brought to Somalia from Arabia according to oral History.
I know you got a lot of shit going on in your life as you stated in one of your previous posts in this thread but don't be losing the plot. You crossed a line with your slander sxb!
The only one who's been truly insulting throughout this exchange is you. All I've done is flatly describe your behavior while you keep accusing me of lying, called me a snake at one point and all this other insulting stuff when, ironically, you're someone who admitted to lying to me and also trying to rile me up because I momentarily lost my cool and pretty much immediately apologized for it. Enough of this tangent, walaal. It's a waste of time and I have a life and don't want to keep going back and forth on this.
Firstly, after you stated that we had buried the hatchet, was I aggressive? Sxb, I made a simple post where I argued that the two sources refer to one and the same trip, gave you a thumbs up and said to each his own. Your reply went off on a different tangent where you began to accuse me of self-hate etc. Why is this turning out to be a broken record? Are you having some sort of Dementia episode bro cos how does burying the hatchet and then doing a 180 by hurling insults add up? If you have a life and do not want to go back and forth surely my harmless comment warranted no reply yet you felt the need to revert back to slandering me with accusations of self-hate? Acudhubillahi!
I do not recall you saying you don't care for them. All I recall is you gassing them up and describing Somalis as essentially savages and the like. All while consistently ignoring that, culturally speaking, Arabians are incredibly similar to Somalis in almost every way and were mostly better off due to their greater proximity to the Fertile Crescent. Incredibly odd stuff for an ethnic Somali to do but to each their own.
I clearly told you in the middle of our DM that you were bringing up peninsular Arabs into the discussion and only after that did I make the Somali comparison where I was the first one to state that Arabs were only more sophisticated than us because they neighboured advanced civilisations, never argued they were savage by nature. It is all in the DM. I also again emphasised in my last post that I do not give a toss about comparisons with Arabs. It is all in there man!
This comes off as shifting goal-posts, walaal. Your original position was that reer Koonfur Somalis were not at all involved in sailing and now it's that they were but it was "low-caste" type ones and not the mainstream tribes unlike in the north. We don't disagree on that and I'm glad you concede it, though.
Enough of this tangent, walaal. I mean no offense, but it comes off as though you are pulling mental gymnastics with the Reer Maanyo to not concede that your original claim that Cadcads dominated the sailing off of Koonfur is baseless. No one calls a group that is actually mixed (part Somali, Cadcad and Bantu) "Gibil-Madow". Gibil-Madow means Gibil-Madow regardless of genealogical root claims. Frankly, some of these genealogies may very well have been originally true but it is clear that these groups more heavily assimilated into Somali society and became Gibil-Madow in appearance and status elsewise they would never be classified as such. And there are small qabiils throughout Somaliweyn who claim obscure Arabian origins unlike the dominant tribes and even in their case it may have been true once upon a time yet it's clear they've heavily assimilated into Somali society and all you're liable to find is a Y-DNA that's off. The Gibil-Madow label always historically meant that they were ancestrally and physically of the core of ethnic Somali groups of the Banaadir who are distinct from the Cadcads:
I clearly took back my assumption that Gibil Cads were probably the ones engaging in sailing in the DM and here so what is there to debate regarding this? The debate here has been mainly about the Kirk source which you were denying until your previous post to this one in which you admitted I was correct. After accepting I was correct regarding the Kirk source, are you going to amend your dhow thread to reflect that the sailors docked in Mogadishu were Arab?
Sxb, I have never associated Reer Maanyo with the Gibil Cad confederation. All I have emphasised, here and in the DM, is that they are partially Somali because two of their bigger subclans have non-Somali qabil lineages. Even the Banadiri source you used in the DM regarding who the Reer Maanyo are does not contradict my statement that they were only partially Somali. Why should I or anyone else ignore the non-Somali ancestry of Ba Mukhtar and Shawesh Bin Ali found in the Reer Maanyo when it is also common knowledge that clans such as the Shaanshi, Hatimi, Qalinshube in other Gibil Madoow clans also do not belong to Somali qabil lineages?
In reality all your original beliefs shared with me go unsubstantiated. That seafaring just popped up with Somalis around the middle of the 1800s, that Isaaqs never sailed and it was just Warsangelis and Majeerteens, that seafaring wasn't widespread and commonly known across the Somali coast, that Cadcads or ajanabis were the ones solely handling all the sailing off Koonfur and more. You claimed every single of one of these things to me and you and I both know each and everyone of those claims is baseless if you go through the thread and I urge you to prove otherwise instead of trying to take jabs at me about how I'm "emotional" about the subject and you're not. Live and let live, though, truly. I pray we're done here cos I am tired of all this.
You are again engaging in slander. In the DM, I never claimed that Isaaqs never sailed. All I argued was that the Majeerten in comparison to the Isaaq and Warsangeli were the most advanced Somali sailing dynasty in recent recorded history, and that the ancestors of Somalis probably sailed as far back as the Barbaroi. This is exactly what I said:
I also made subsequent DM posts in which I stated that the Warsangeli sailed before the 19th century and referenced the story of Suldaan Cali Dableh who is reputedly one of the earliest examples of firearms being brought to Somalia from Arabia according to oral History.
I know you got a lot of shit going on in your life as you stated in one of your previous posts in this thread but don't be losing the plot. You crossed a line with your slander sxb!
Last edited: