I believe it's important to recognize that humans have intrinsic worth, and goodwill toward humanity is essential. However, when it comes to women choosing a husband or the father of their children, they must be more discerning. A wrong choice can have long-lasting consequences. Factors like attractiveness, character, and material circumstances are significant. If women could have lifelong fertility and pass on gestation, primary caregiving, and breastfeeding to men, there might be equality, but that isn't physically possible. Men, if they are wise, certainly consider a woman's relationship history/past as it reflects self-discipline and mental/emotional stability. Additionally, men tend to be more possessive and often view women more proprietarily than women view men.

Generally speaking, pursuing a relationship with a 47-year-old woman with children can be acceptable. However, it may not be ideal for a man in his 30s who is a billionaire with the best pick of women in his community or elsewhere. The biological clock is likely nearing its end at her age, which is fine if he's child-free. However, this could lead to a temporary marriage rather than a lifelong commitment, especially considering the rising divorce rates. And being previously married increases the probability of that. It's possible that the man already has children or a family, and everyone has different expectations. But if he desires more children, this situation is far from ideal. Optically, it might not look great, but on shows like "90 Day FiancΓ©," weβve seen that in Lagos or Abuja, there's a fondness for "cadaan cougars."