There's absolutely no European Jew, Ashkenazi which make up the majority, so called Jews R1A today, nor the saphardic who can trace their lineage to levites, hell even the mizrahis can't. they're all mix bag of E, J, R.
Levi or lewi was a great grandfather of musa & Haroon. the so called Cohens or priestly family were supposed to be from Haroon descendants that's a fact, but some how the total number of Levites during the Exodus were about 22,000 of them that's the men only.
how is that possible! even if levite himself had 100 wives his descendants wouldn't have been that much. some of these guys lived more than 100 years old still wouldn't make up that much. There's something off about the Levites Tally in NUMBERs 3 verse 39. Musa father was Imran, his grandfather was kohath and his great grand father was Levi/Lewi how did these families become a clan of 22,000? rhetorical question!.
{ which by the way ahl bayt has nothing to do with Ali nor the "family" of the prophet. the Quran mentions Ahl bayt in three occasions & Ali was never refered to. first relates to Ibrahim 11:73, secondly relates to Musa 28:12 and lastly relates to Muhammad 33:33. The Muhammad verse was about the women of his household being told to cover themselves, pray salat & pay zakat, so that Allah would purify them & not act as of the old days of ignorance.
Every one claiming to be ahl bayt today is nothing but a lier or a shegato. The prophet has no descendants nor can Ali descendants be of his even if they had the same grand father & belong to the same tribe.}
without actually testing these individuals either Muhammad, Ali, Ibrahim, Isxaaq, ya3qub, isha3iil. Everyone is correct & wrong at the same time.
All of it started from the first fitna and for the Israelites during the Assyrian and Babylonian exile.
Maybe they're under J-p58, E1B1B, R1B, E1B1A, G, H. My only argument against those haplogroups is the fact that pharaohs of Egypt are found to belong to those haplogroups.
Prophet Yusuf was never pharaoh or considered to be one, but worked for them & was given a high status within the foreigners who came to rule lower Egypt from avaris as their Capital.
There's zero evidence to suggest Ibrahim &
his descendants belong to J-P58. There's zero evidence to suggest Ibrahim came from southern Iraq archeologically or any DNA findings that goes back to Ibrahim himself.
Semitic belong to multiple haplogroups there's only linguistic argument for who is a semite or semitic dispersal. If it's from shem then there no way of knowing who, unless shem is found & tested.
The idea of Jewishness has to do with the kingdom of Judea, so long as someone was a "citizen" in the kingdom of Judea they were considered "Jewish". Even Benjamins descendants lived with the yehudi who became the kings & controlled the southern kingdom aka Judea after the united kingdom of Israel was split during sulaymans death till the Babylonian exile. The Benjaminate were considered "Jews". The other ten lived in the north & called Israel who were said to be lost which is highly improbable, hundreds of thousands of humans don't just get lost without a trice, nor were they massacred in wars.
My point is the Cohen's Can't be a model of sort measuring stick whom Haroon decedent's were or are, neither can't the Jordanian monarchs. The only evidence Ali or Muhammad is believe to be under J-L859 is because of them no other evidence.
Mind y'all Ali is supposed to be J-FGC10500 1400ybp. What are the chance that if & when Ali & Muhammad are tested they would score that specific SNP & ypb!?! What evidence are there to suggest Ibrahims SNP & Isxaq & isma3iil had different SNP from their fathers let alone fihr aka Quarish & Ali!?! Without testing them. Scientific research should include every aspect of Hypotheses theoretical, hypothetical explanations of observations and measurements of the subject, Predictions, inductive and deductive reasoning from the hypothesis or theory, Experiments, tests of all of the above.
The only reason most people lean on which in itself not evidence the L859 being Quarish is, because of the Jordanian sample and their claim to being descendants of Hassan ibn Ali Abu talib. was Hassan tested rhetorical question!.
What if I tell you that they were never a sheriff of mecca. That the "mecca" south of Madina was not actually the mecca Quarish tribes resided, nor Muhammad grew up in, neither was it the mecca aka Kaaba build by Ibrahim with isham3iil. For it doesn't make sense hagar and little sma3iil to travel 650+ miles on foot with a little bag of water to a waste land neither has any prophet ever been to the modern day mecca or anywhere south of Madina since before Muhammad. Neither can modern day "mecca" be considered mother of all cities, it was not on a major trading route nor ancients ever mentioned till the 7th century CE.
That mecca was build by Abdullah ibn zubair when he was a contender for the caliphate against Marwan ibn Muawiyah and he ran from hajjaj ibn Yusuf the general of marwans army and he stole the black rock. the real mecca and Kaaba was never rebuilt after it was destroyed by wars/battle between hajjaj ibn Yusuf and Abdullah ibn yusuf, earthquake and floodings and the ancient building still standing around it.
Not only that Ibrahim never been to southern Iraq but came from north of Haran in modern day southern eastern turkey.
If that's the case then there's little to zero evidence L859 could be Quarish and the Jordanian would be the biggest shegato in human history along with the so called modern day Cohen's and jews.
I understand most of you will not believe let alone acknowledge the above, cause you've all been brainwashed to believe that modern day mecca is where Muhammad and Quarish resided, but mind y'all the Saudis have been digging all around "mecca" to this very day! have found zero graves sites or human remains. They found nothing but sand. even the area where the battle badr took place has no graves it's just an empty land. It was customery to bury the fallen soldiers where they died.
The only reasonable and logical direction to take at this point is to test these known graves sites of the prophets, otherwise we'll never know and argue from a moot point.
Levi or lewi was a great grandfather of musa & Haroon. the so called Cohens or priestly family were supposed to be from Haroon descendants that's a fact, but some how the total number of Levites during the Exodus were about 22,000 of them that's the men only.
how is that possible! even if levite himself had 100 wives his descendants wouldn't have been that much. some of these guys lived more than 100 years old still wouldn't make up that much. There's something off about the Levites Tally in NUMBERs 3 verse 39. Musa father was Imran, his grandfather was kohath and his great grand father was Levi/Lewi how did these families become a clan of 22,000? rhetorical question!.
{ which by the way ahl bayt has nothing to do with Ali nor the "family" of the prophet. the Quran mentions Ahl bayt in three occasions & Ali was never refered to. first relates to Ibrahim 11:73, secondly relates to Musa 28:12 and lastly relates to Muhammad 33:33. The Muhammad verse was about the women of his household being told to cover themselves, pray salat & pay zakat, so that Allah would purify them & not act as of the old days of ignorance.
Every one claiming to be ahl bayt today is nothing but a lier or a shegato. The prophet has no descendants nor can Ali descendants be of his even if they had the same grand father & belong to the same tribe.}
without actually testing these individuals either Muhammad, Ali, Ibrahim, Isxaaq, ya3qub, isha3iil. Everyone is correct & wrong at the same time.
All of it started from the first fitna and for the Israelites during the Assyrian and Babylonian exile.
Maybe they're under J-p58, E1B1B, R1B, E1B1A, G, H. My only argument against those haplogroups is the fact that pharaohs of Egypt are found to belong to those haplogroups.
Prophet Yusuf was never pharaoh or considered to be one, but worked for them & was given a high status within the foreigners who came to rule lower Egypt from avaris as their Capital.
There's zero evidence to suggest Ibrahim &
his descendants belong to J-P58. There's zero evidence to suggest Ibrahim came from southern Iraq archeologically or any DNA findings that goes back to Ibrahim himself.
Semitic belong to multiple haplogroups there's only linguistic argument for who is a semite or semitic dispersal. If it's from shem then there no way of knowing who, unless shem is found & tested.
The idea of Jewishness has to do with the kingdom of Judea, so long as someone was a "citizen" in the kingdom of Judea they were considered "Jewish". Even Benjamins descendants lived with the yehudi who became the kings & controlled the southern kingdom aka Judea after the united kingdom of Israel was split during sulaymans death till the Babylonian exile. The Benjaminate were considered "Jews". The other ten lived in the north & called Israel who were said to be lost which is highly improbable, hundreds of thousands of humans don't just get lost without a trice, nor were they massacred in wars.
My point is the Cohen's Can't be a model of sort measuring stick whom Haroon decedent's were or are, neither can't the Jordanian monarchs. The only evidence Ali or Muhammad is believe to be under J-L859 is because of them no other evidence.
Mind y'all Ali is supposed to be J-FGC10500 1400ybp. What are the chance that if & when Ali & Muhammad are tested they would score that specific SNP & ypb!?! What evidence are there to suggest Ibrahims SNP & Isxaq & isma3iil had different SNP from their fathers let alone fihr aka Quarish & Ali!?! Without testing them. Scientific research should include every aspect of Hypotheses theoretical, hypothetical explanations of observations and measurements of the subject, Predictions, inductive and deductive reasoning from the hypothesis or theory, Experiments, tests of all of the above.
The only reason most people lean on which in itself not evidence the L859 being Quarish is, because of the Jordanian sample and their claim to being descendants of Hassan ibn Ali Abu talib. was Hassan tested rhetorical question!.
What if I tell you that they were never a sheriff of mecca. That the "mecca" south of Madina was not actually the mecca Quarish tribes resided, nor Muhammad grew up in, neither was it the mecca aka Kaaba build by Ibrahim with isham3iil. For it doesn't make sense hagar and little sma3iil to travel 650+ miles on foot with a little bag of water to a waste land neither has any prophet ever been to the modern day mecca or anywhere south of Madina since before Muhammad. Neither can modern day "mecca" be considered mother of all cities, it was not on a major trading route nor ancients ever mentioned till the 7th century CE.
That mecca was build by Abdullah ibn zubair when he was a contender for the caliphate against Marwan ibn Muawiyah and he ran from hajjaj ibn Yusuf the general of marwans army and he stole the black rock. the real mecca and Kaaba was never rebuilt after it was destroyed by wars/battle between hajjaj ibn Yusuf and Abdullah ibn yusuf, earthquake and floodings and the ancient building still standing around it.
Not only that Ibrahim never been to southern Iraq but came from north of Haran in modern day southern eastern turkey.
If that's the case then there's little to zero evidence L859 could be Quarish and the Jordanian would be the biggest shegato in human history along with the so called modern day Cohen's and jews.
I understand most of you will not believe let alone acknowledge the above, cause you've all been brainwashed to believe that modern day mecca is where Muhammad and Quarish resided, but mind y'all the Saudis have been digging all around "mecca" to this very day! have found zero graves sites or human remains. They found nothing but sand. even the area where the battle badr took place has no graves it's just an empty land. It was customery to bury the fallen soldiers where they died.
The only reasonable and logical direction to take at this point is to test these known graves sites of the prophets, otherwise we'll never know and argue from a moot point.
