Those that are accusing me of copying and pasting. Yes I am and why? Because my mere opinion is not valid. The opinion of scholars and muftis on the issue is more important which is what you lot should be focusing on.
Scholar Abdallah here thinks he can offer fatwas using his own understanding of a hadith. He is using deduction which is not allowed for a layman.
'If that is the case than that means...'
It is not your place to tell people what this means or that means. Leave it to the scholars. Which is why i've repeatedly asked you for scholarly opinion and you have provided me with none. Only a hadith which you preceed to add your own opinion to the meaning.
Well, here is the problem. So if you are saying that men are free to chose to kill their daughters based on their selfish needs or lunacy without any worldly consequences, then why do we not then advocate for a free society where no crime gets punished, because Allah is going to judge us accordingly anyway?Intent? That is for Allah to judge.
yes that's what I am kinda referring to but I'm sure if the father did the killing he wouldn't be punished by Allah since it does say to kill these sort of peopleEven then it will be unlawful for the father to take the law into his own hands.
Only the state can issue hadood.
She selectively quotes islam and twists it for her benefit.I saw someone mention promiscuous women and she immediately engaged in whataboutism.You were given the scholarly opinion by @Karim when he said all the madhaahib-except for Malik- hold that opinion. Unless you want us to copy and paste articles from google. We gave you the hadeeth, the logical background (i.e to whom is the diya paid, to himself?). All you did was come with silly questions as will he enter hell or paradise? But but but smoking is haram and theres no hudud law for that. And 'just because theres no consequences doeant mean it is halal
Spend some years on the hard floor of the masajid instead of shopping for fatawa.
I agree. Even outside religion killing your own blood is extremely hard thing to even consider when you think about it. This whole debate is crazy tbhMostly from Islamqa which is more hanbali
And islamqa.org which is hanafi.
Both reputable sites.
This is the hanafi opinion:
From the aforementioned ahadith we can derive that if a father killed his son intentionally then the sin the father will receive will be very grave and the consequences in the Hereafter will be severe.
Here is the link:
islamqa.org/hanafi/daruliftaa-birmingham/88162
If you read this fatwa. The scholar is of the opinion the father must pay diya.
But my argument is that every fatwa i have read on the issue all highlighted that killing your child for whatever reason is considered morally reprehensible regardless of the whether the father has to pay diyaa or not.
I think anyone who has a holistic knowledge of Islam can see that murdering your child is despicable.
Intent? That is for
You were given the scholarly opinion by @Karim when he said all the madhaahib-except for Malik- hold that opinion. Unless you want us to copy and paste articles from google. We gave you the hadeeth, the logical background (i.e to whom is the diya paid, to himself?). All you did was come with silly questions as will he enter hell or paradise? But but but smoking is haram and theres no hudud law for that. And 'just because theres no consequences doeant mean it is halal
Spend some years on the hard floor of the masajid instead of shopping for fatawa.
Well, here is the problem. So if you are saying that men are free to chose to kill their daughters based on their selfish needs or lunacy without any worldly consequences, then why do we not then advocate for a free society where no crime gets punished, because Allah is going to judge s accordingly anyway?
She selectively quotes islam and twists it for her benefit.I saw someone mention promiscuous women and she immediately engaged in whataboutism.
Walaal no one is disputing with whether the father has to pay diyaa
Not paying diyaa is not an indication of whether something is permissable or not.
In fact some of the scholars that I have posted actually agreed with the fact that a father does not have to pay, yet they argue that he will still be severly punished in the akhira and it is a major sin.
You either have low IQ and an inability to understand points or you are just trying to be difficult.
Please provide proof that it is not a sin. I understand your point that he does not have to pay diyaa, but that has nothing to do with permissability.
The only time execution will be neededI actually feel blessed that most of the Somali guys I know in real life are completely normal. Makes me appreciate them even more.
You lot are actually really scary. To think that we have faraaxs walking thinking that killing women and calling them hos and slags is acceptable behaviour??
I actually feel blessed that most of the Somali guys I know in real life are completely normal. Makes me appreciate them even more.
You lot are actually really scary. To think that we have faraaxs walking thinking that killing women and calling them hos and slags is acceptable behaviour??
so Killing women and calling them hoes are equivalent?I actually feel blessed that most of the Somali guys I know in real life are completely normal. Makes me appreciate them even more.
You lot are actually really scary. To think that we have faraaxs walking thinking that killing women and calling them hos and slags is acceptable behaviour??
The change is happening quicker than even I expected. You guys are all crazy......it always starts like this.I actually feel blessed that most of the Somali guys I know in real life are completely normal. Makes me appreciate them even more.
You lot are actually really scary. To think that we have faraaxs walking thinking that killing women and calling them hos and slags is acceptable behaviour??
Give me an example of an action that is severely punished if person A does it but not if it is done by person B?
so Killing women and calling them hoes are equivalent?
We obviously dont tell random somali girls our view of women lol.Guys hide their thoughts but inside if your fucking around we call you a hoe.
Sure, if you say so. I’ve already responded to downright carbon copies of your post, so you could read through the thread and get a pretty clear representation of my stance that way.Yooo We may disagree, but you disagree with fax. I mean, how can you dismiss that? You should respond with arguments next time. And i don't understand how u qashin against logic? I may not know you in real life, but i have this image in my head about you, and your response gives me more and more assurance in my ability to accurately evaluate people.
Her fantasy of marrying an ex con crushed as she realised that it can cost her her life lol
It's haram to kill an innocent soul, let alone a Muslim. Honour killings are haram in Islam. This debate is ridiculous.You were given the scholarly opinion by @Karim when he said all the madhaahib-except for Malik- hold that opinion. Unless you want us to copy and paste articles from google. We gave you the hadeeth, the logical background (i.e to whom is the diya paid, to himself?). All you did was come with silly questions as will he enter hell or paradise? But but but smoking is haram and theres no hudud law for that. And 'just because theres no consequences doeant mean it is halal
Spend some years on the hard floor of the masajid instead of shopping for fatawa.