Saudi Arabian Bedouin from the Mutair tribe on the E-V32

[Maakhri2024]

What do DNA enthusiasts / experts think about the result below?

Marwan (@PhilistiaForeva) / X
For the first time I have come across a sample with a pure Arab Bedouin profile below the E-M78 lineage:
- Specifically branch E-V32.
- The ancient Arabian peninsula component : 99%
- Natufian component: 78%.
- The closest contemporaries: the Arabs of Al-Jawf in Yemen and the Rashaida in Sudan.
- Closest remains: Socotra remains.
- Sample owner: Badawi Mutairi from Najd (بدوي مطيري من نجد)

لأول مرة تمر معي عينة ب بروفايل بدوي عربي قح أسفل السلالة
E-M78:
-تحديدا الفرع
E-V32 .

 

[Arabsiyawi]

What do DNA enthusiasts / experts think about the result below?

Marwan (@PhilistiaForeva) / X
For the first time I have come across a sample with a pure Arab Bedouin profile below the E-M78 lineage:
- Specifically branch E-V32.
- The ancient Arabian peninsula component : 99%
- Natufian component: 78%.
- The closest contemporaries: the Arabs of Al-Jawf in Yemen and the Rashaida in Sudan.
- Closest remains: Socotra remains.
- Sample owner: Badawi Mutairi from Najd (بدوي مطيري من نجد)

لأول مرة تمر معي عينة ب بروفايل بدوي عربي قح أسفل السلالة
E-M78:
-تحديدا الفرع
E-V32 .

E-V32 is a 9k years old lineage from Northern Africa. There’s nothing surprising in seeing people from nearby regions get it here and there.

 

[Garaad Awal]

Probably arrived with the Arab migrations from the Southern Levant. It seems like some branches of E-V32 has been in the Southern Levant for a really long time.

 

[The alchemist]

The 78% Natufian is sourced from several related ancestries with probably not high real Natufian DNA. Neolithic and Bronze Age Levant is the bulk of such ancestry. Then you have a ~21% Iran Neolithic component (most Arabians have that range), with the rest being Anatolian Neolithic.
Those distances seem a bit high.

 

[Step a side]

The 78% Natufian is sourced from several related ancestries with probably not high real Natufian DNA. Neolithic and Bronze Age Levant is the bulk of such ancestry. Then you have a ~21% Iran Neolithic component (most Arabians have that range), with the rest being Anatolian Neolithic.
Those distances seem a bit high.

Just realised they are missing Anatolian Neolithic which is usually in the 10-15% range. It’s all hidden in his Natufian.

 

[The alchemist]

Just realised they are missing Anatolian Neolithic which is usually in the 10-15% range. It’s all hidden in his Natufian.

Those results make no sense because the model is bad. If OP has the cords, it's easily testable.

The distance shows he has substructure or regionalization. Perhaps higher Anatolian related ancestry. Y-Jawf and Y-Jew are not the most Natufian heavy sample, for example, so 78% is left field. You can't at one time be closest to Jawf and have higher than normal Natufian. These are not reconcilable