NordicSomali
VIP
it will be more developed but still unstable, like Lebanon.
No and I don't careis that too low of a number or?
GDP is a lousy metric for success. But if we use it, it is theoretically possible to rise 10 times in GDP from 500 USD per capita within a decade from 20,000 USD to 30,000 USD. Or perhaps it is around equivalent.No. Somalia will not be a developed country in 30 years. It will probably not even be a lower middle income country in 20 years.
If Somalia manages to have a:
- GDP growth rate of 6.5%
- Population growth rate of 2.6
With a GNI per capita of $590 today, it would have a GNI per capita of $1,244 in 20 years (2044) and $1,806 in 30 years (2054). The current threshold for lower middle income is $1,146. In 20 year's time we will be where Tanzania is today and in 30 years where Nigeria is now.
btw no country in Africa has ever sustained a 6.5% GDP growth rate for 30 years.
Incorrect. The fact that Somalis score high in trust is what makes us seperate from other Africans
Entrust We Must: The Role of "Trust" in Somali Economic Life
Entrust We Must: The Role of "Trust" in Somali Economic Life
research.cbs.dk
In Somali business success, trust plays a vital role
btw @Shimbiris @Midas
I also forgot to add, the other added advantage Somalia has is that it's economy and resources is largely in the hands of Somalis, if you discount the cut Alshabab makes in it. This is unlike many other African countries like Kenya, South Africa and even Ethiopia who's economy is ran by foreigners. That and also zero debt as a starting point.
It's not an hyper bole to say that the future situation for Somalia looks more hopeful considering this.
Business people are regularly extorted and threatened by Al Shabab, they evade paying taxes to government authorities because they know it won't go towards basic services like infrastructure which would benefit their business, there is zero property rights and corrupt people regularly take advantage and make up false stories about owning the business decades ago and come up with fake paperwork to prove it. Workers are many times denied pay and businesses are regularly fooled by lazy workers who promise to deliver but chew khat on the job. Amina Hersi is one of the most successful business people in East Africa yet has zero business presence in her native Somaliland for instance. And the thousands of others in Dubai and Eastleigh. They trust South African townships more.
We have some work in the pipeline in Somalia as well [and are] waiting for the country’s situation to stabilise.
That’s best case scenario not necessarily the most likelySouth Africa??? Lool u have so much hope.
GDP is a lousy metric for success. But if we use it, it is theoretically possible to rise 10 times in GDP from 500 USD per capita within a decade from 20,000 USD to 30,000 USD. Or perhaps it is around equivalent.
And we haven't gotten the rapid GDP rise because key industries have not surfaced. If certain semi-coherent systems are set up, it could be 5 years of "miracles", then hypothetical stagnation or even cyclical variance, with a sharp uprise again.
We need macro-game theory parameters where sectors' output influences others' input. When that is not clearly defined, inefficiency in economic growth is almost completely diffusionist and cannot be channeled, behaving like entropy.
The Somali economy has always been unique in that it has been extremely flexible. There is a deep historical explanation for this. Issues arise with such a mode of participation in the modern nation-state model., i.e., a lack of competent guidance without boundary discipline; you cannot even define bare minimum policy measures that can be effective without the pre-requisite. Things are too unrefined, there is much more to tap into when certain formations set the stage to define gradual growth. I think it is going to be a stagnant rise with boom cycles, rather than a gradual increase model (plateau-like shifts). Things have to reach a certain stage first.
GDP narrows discrepancies between rural life and urban concentration. There are big problems with this. It does not speak to the urban potential in itself as the nexus for economic highlight, and it reduces the rural informal value-added gains. What I am saying is, for all those reasons, GDP captures more consistent value in any developed country, even developing countries such as Egypt, than Somalia or Somaliland. There is too much vigor that is uniquely untapped. Don't be surprised if the rigid measures suddenly skyrocket. We're going to see a potential inverse situation as Japan. They suddenly saw a bubble, we're going to suddenly stumble upon growth. Meaning that the incremental growth is extremely meaningful (it's rarely incremental on the ground). It serves a formational definition, not a gradual growth purpose, for it to shoot up. This is my perspective on this.
The cashflow systems in medium to small businesses have unstable credit and market risk assessment. We need more fine-tuning and that can only occur through comprehensive incremental patient systemic buildup. It doesn't even need to be perfect, just imperfect key pre-conditions. After that, you will see an unusual rise; an inverse bubble. There is a reason why Somalis had very low economic growth for a long time.
Nah we had our peak pre 1500s and after that just slowly devolved.never, Somalia was doomed from the start.
Depends on what you mean by developedis that too low of a number or?
Alshabab aren't the main issue, it's wild corruption by politicians.Unless alshabab is defeated and foreign investment start pouring to somalia forget it.