Stop with the “without publicly mentioning it” it was clear as day who it was aimed at. Let’s not act naive here. My point was prior to all of this it should’ve initially been done in private and in a diplomatic manner.
Exactly, these people are driven by their hatred and narrow clan interest they're willing to destroy everything. Wallahi that scares me more than what they accuse Farmaajo of. Like what the hell are you bringing me, everything you say about him you're 100 times worser.
What diplomacy when they are actively hostile and trying to cause chaos. It was aimed in general but they feel the need to be aggressive. What do you want us to do, beg and grovel at their feet.
If it was so simpleton to just be straighforward, there would be no need to diplomatic etiquette. It exists for a reason.
No there is no contingency. Let’s not lie here. The only way of a legitimate contingency would’ve been to legally getting an extension from Parliament which for whatever reason Farmaajo was unsuccessful in.
I guess you missed this post. Too bad even the UN disagrees with you. Unfortunately for you, you will not get the civil war you want.
Since when was diplomacy begging and groveling? You have a very skewed outlook on politics I must say. If the FGS felt UAE or any other nation was undermining Somalia sovereignty the first step would be to actually speak to the nation directly in private in a diplomatic way. That’s what nearly all countries do.
Not true. Many countries use generally veiled foreign affairs statements to send a message without implicating the offending side. It is just a diplomatic tool.
Huh? Wallahi you’re just sick in the head if you think anybody wants civil war.
What’s not true? That many countries use diplomatic talks to try resolve issues? At least know what you’re taking about saying it’s not true doesn’t make it so
Where is the diplomacy on their side. What gives them the right to actively interfere and cause conflict.
You're the one agreeing with UAE and calling the gov illegitimate. What's the next stage after that, what do the 'going back to 91' fanboys want.
If you think most countries don’t speak in private Whether that be through a delegate or directly diplomatically and then you are very naive. What’s not true about your point is:
So because I state the government is past it’s mandate that I somehow want a civil war? Does your brain not filter the shit that you say
As I said it's a tool in the diplomatic arsenal of many countries to send a message. It is not always about direct talks. Your view is very simplistic and doesn't reflect reality.
Ok I’ll flip that around and say it’s not always about diplomatic statements either. By your own logic your view is very simplistic and doesn’t reflect reality
You are actively pushing the gov is illegitimate angle and supporting UAE. There is only one consequence I see the people pushing that angle. The objective is to create a power vacuum. Stop acting dumb.So because I state the government is past it’s mandate that I somehow want a civil war? Does your brain not filter the shit that you say
Every situation calls for specifically tailored action. Just like in your personal life, you won't always run up to somebody to discuss and resolve issues in face to face scenario. Often times it is best not to confront, but mention generally so that the other side can be made aware and stopped from acting up.
