Abdullnur
Logic over everything
every individual in society should have equal power and be represented by their government
So the farmer has the same power as the president .. read THE LEVIATHAN written in 1651 on the king's right to rule .
every individual in society should have equal power and be represented by their government
yes the farmer should have the same say as the president, president is just the chief executive that executes what the people want whether he agrees or notSo the farmer has the same power as the president .. read THE LEVIATHAN written in 1651 on the king's right to rule .
Bab el Mandeb, Aden, Suez and the other strategical points in the Red Sea were largely untouched because it was the under control of the Umayyads then the later Ottomans until the 1880s along the coastal lines of north east Africa.
It was no need because they were friends at that time and pose no threat (thanks to our religion that kept us friends). They had the naval capabilities to deter the threats of the European powers whereas the Horns of Africa had so many different Sultans ruling different territories unlike them so the navy in East Africa was non-existent.
The only downside was Europe managed to fill in the void left by the Ottomans.
Don't be childish we have roles to play . A strong educated self interested leader is not a blessing but a God send.yes the farmer should have the same say as the president, president is just the chief executive that executes what the people want whether he agrees or not
I believe the president should have pretty much no power and just be the face of the nation to sign the papers and meet foreign leaders and what not, the representatives should be making the calls, and these representatives should represent their constituents thoroughly, their should be equal power differing factions so that neither gets to big and steps on the rights of the little guy(individuals), and everyone in theory should have equal say and power in matters through this representative system where politicians represent the people but don't hold any power outside thatDon't be childish we have roles to play . A strong educated self interested leader is not a blessing but a God send.
I believe the president should have pretty much no power and just be the face of the nation to sign the papers and meet foreign leaders and what not, the representatives should be making the calls, and these representatives should represent their constituents thoroughly, their should be equal power differing factions so that neither gets to big and steps on the rights of the little guy(individuals), and everyone in theory should have equal say and power in matters through this representative system where politicians represent the people but don't hold any power outside that
Tukraq is a land belonging dhulbahante and not turkish looolSo you would rather have it spread around to several theifs instead of one .
Lol sounds suspicious to meTukraq is a land belonging dhulbahante and not turkish loool
It means crow in somaliLol sounds suspicious to me
It means crow in somali
It has alot of crows who recently ate dead jeganta troops fleshNo wonder , somali is where it is today , we name city after clowns .
did you miss the part where I said the president in the face? he basically speaks on the will of the people, their should always be disagreement and debate on every measure the government passes so it docent go against the will of the people and step on any of their rights, I'm sorry a person or a small group of people however educated they are shouldn't be blindly governing me with out my input, a government is supposed to serve its people not be served by it, this is why the people themselves should have the most say on these polices that effect themThe head of the nation with no power . We would the laughing stock of the wirld, oh wait we are. How would you get anything done in the system.
The king speak his will , it done
President speaks, farmer jumps up disagrees says take care of me, next the representative and those how finance them have to see if this is in their interest, then comes the people half want half dont. Chaos and confusion my friend. And when I say one man , I don't mean one in his just spotting words. I mean a council of his most trusted and those with merit say these are the things we need to take care of , and the one , gets breifings and a choice is made
I've read the leviathan lol, but you should read the federalist papers by James Madison and why America moved from the British monarchy to a representative government/first modern republicSo the farmer has the same power as the president .. read THE LEVIATHAN written in 1651 on the king's right to rule .
did you miss the part where I said the president in the face? he basically speaks on the will of the people, their should always be disagreement and debate on every measure the government passes so it docent go against the will of the people and step on any of their rights, I'm sorry a person or a small group of people however educated they are shouldn't be blindly governing me with out my input, a government is supposed to serve its people not be served by it, this is why the people themselves should have the most say on these polices that effect them
This sounds ridiculous
Somalia has no right to slap a 25% tariff on any ship that passes through the Red Sea. That is outright theft and shouldn’t be allowed. The Red Sea is used to transport goods between China and Europe, and cutting that trade route off is tantamount to a declaration of war. In fact, any major power would be justified in declaring war against the Somali State for having the audacity to close off such a crucial avenue of global trade.
If a Chinese corporation makes a product, and they sell it to Europe, and it passes through the Red Sea, WHAT RIGHT DO WE HAVE TO TAX IT? Really? A fucking 25% tariff just because these ships briefly passed nearby Somali waters? Should Iran have the right to tax any ship that passes the Strait of Hormuz? Should Spain tax any ship that passes through the Gibraltar strait?
This is a classic Somali example of trying to get something from nothing. You’re trying to use Somalia’s geographical position to bully the rest of the world into accepting a ridiculous 25% tax on all ships, even if these ships have nothing to do with Somalia.
If that passage goes through our waters, it simply means that god has given us a major gift in the form of taxation. We should split it though with yemen after their war.
This sounds ridiculous
Somalia has no right to slap a 25% tariff on any ship that passes through the Red Sea. That is outright theft and shouldn’t be allowed. The Red Sea is used to transport goods between China and Europe, and cutting that trade route off is tantamount to a declaration of war. In fact, any major power would be justified in declaring war against the Somali State for having the audacity to close off such a crucial avenue of global trade.
If a Chinese corporation makes a product, and they sell it to Europe, and it passes through the Red Sea, WHAT RIGHT DO WE HAVE TO TAX IT? Really? A fucking 25% tariff just because these ships briefly passed nearby Somali waters? Should Iran have the right to tax any ship that passes the Strait of Hormuz? Should Spain tax any ship that passes through the Gibraltar strait?
This is a classic Somali example of trying to get something from nothing. You’re trying to use Somalia’s geographical position to bully the rest of the world into accepting a ridiculous 25% tax on all ships, even if these ships have nothing to do with Somalia.
Your entire thread is about you having contempt for the nation you have to beYou certainly fit the description ,and has contempt for the nation you have to be