federalism is not good for somalis. we should be seeking independence as the garxajis sultanate, we will take sool and hawd for good measures.
the presidency is nothing more than a fancy title, it's whoever holds the lacag that rules
murdock and may for example
and yet i see every Tom, ''General'' Dick and Harry among the isaaqs taking turn on Presidential seat while Habar Yuunus gets no fair share,....why i must ask why though??
You can't think outside of the colonial paradigm and the lines those drunk british bastards drew in the sand, my philosophy is Somaliweyne and what worries Ethiopia/Kenya and their masters is the realisation of Greater Somalia not your pathetic Somalia/Somaliland nationalist arguments.
The British gave both NFD/Somali-Galbeed away to ensure the barbarian's never unite and this is the main focus ever since to ensure the status quo continues, this is what your brain fails to understand and until you do, you will continue to wallow in this humiliation and dupery.
Sxb we have learned from Somaliland's failure (recognition won't work). We can declare it the Garhajis sultanate of Somalia. We will select a king and a royal family, a federal state that is bit different from the others.
Did you receive this revelation after realising Waddani will lose
I always knew recognition will never come (very unrealistic). I am not the average low IQ resident in Somaliland getting exorcised by some sheikh.
Good thing vast majority of Gx don't think like you
What the actual fk
1. You refer to this land as Somalia, a colonial name
2. You wish to build a united Somali nation, the thought was first propagated by colonialists
3. You wish to rule from one city, a capital. This is a colonial concept which goes against xeer somaliyeed
4. You follow a post colonial world in everything with your day to day life. Whether it's your somalia passport or use of shillings
The only time this "don't follow the gaalo colonialist" logic is applied is when someone brings forth the legalities behind Somalilands independence. That's why yall stink of nifaaq
1) Allah was the first one who commanded Muslims to unite and to not divide themselves in the Qur'an before the Somali race even existed.You wish to build a united Somali nation, the thought was first propagated by colonialists
@Ridig Rabah That is plan B since it is clear Sland will
never get recognition. Let me correct you by the way, the entire central Somaliland
block also known as Habr Garhajis block belongs to us. We don't need to unite with
anyone. Western Togdheer + Eastern Waqooyi Galbeed + Sanaag meets the federal
requirement of 2 regions or more.
Sxb we have learned from Somaliland's failure (recognition won't work). We can declare it the Garhajis sultanate of Somalia. We will select a king and a royal family, a federal state that is bit different from the others.
Sxb, Inquisitive is one of the dumbest posters.What the actual fk
1. You refer to this land as Somalia, a colonial name
2. You wish to build a united Somali nation, the thought was first propagated by colonialists
3. You wish to rule from one city, a capital. This is a colonial concept which goes against xeer somaliyeed
4. You follow a post colonial world in everything with your day to day life. Whether it's your somalia passport or use of shillings
The only time this "don't follow the gaalo colonialist" logic is applied is when someone brings forth the legalities behind Somalilands independence. That's why yall stink of nifaaq
1. False, simply plural of Somali's, call it Somaliyeed, Somalinimo whatever you like, terms are meaningless what is implied is most important, your arguing for exclusive tribal state whereas I argue for a encompassing Somaliweyne that has the Xabashi's/Kikuye's worried day and night.
2. False, doesn't even deserve a response, most lunatic assertion I have read on here
3. False and again putting words into my mouth, also giving colonialist credit for things that always existed even in our sultanates and way before them
4. Red herring following is either by choice/force, the latter is true for me, however for you it's different since you argue for colonial model perpetuity, hence your the one arguing for servile servitude continuation.
Your last statement debunked by your 4 point false assertions and red herrings.
For the sake of the unity of the new sultanate. The paternal line will be Hyoonis and the maternal line Cidagale. That means the man
must always marry a CG woman. @horumar Do we have a agreement?
You misunderstood, the dynasty will be CG led, the consorts can be HY, or we can have an elective monarch, each suldaan will be CG then HY, CG then HY, just like the power sharing between the hausa, yoruba and igbo in nigeria