funny u giving a shit about scienceSociology is a science hence scientific.
funny u giving a shit about scienceSociology is a science hence scientific.
Sociology is a social science (pseudoscience)Sociology is a science hence scientific.
The hypocrisy is showing entirely in this thread. Cushite is the white man's term, the same way black is the white man's term. How are you going to claim one and then complain the other is European classification when they both are?
Except black is based on colour and cushite is based on our genetic, cultural and linguistic heritage. We are said to be the descendants of Nabi Noahs grandson Kush. Hence the term cushite.
I fully agree with being labelled a cushite because that is what we are. Its a silly theory or pseudoscience this has been scientifically proven and tested.
That's fine but some people don't claim the term "black" because a white man created it. Then go on about how they're cushites. If you acknowledge one being a white term, acknowledge the other.
The hypocrisy is showing entirely in this thread. Cushite is the white man's term, the same way black is the white man's term. How are you going to claim one and then complain the other is European classification when they both are?
Except black is based on colour and cushite is based on our genetic, cultural and linguistic heritage. We are said to be the descendants of Nabi Noahs grandson Kush. Hence the term cushite.
I fully agree with being labelled a cushite because that is what we are. Its a silly theory or pseudoscience this has been scientifically proven and tested.
We are humans irregardless of color.so is black so whats ur point
Science is logic not about what is written.funny u giving a shit about science
View attachment 142084
That's fine but some people don't claim the term "black" because a white man created it. Then go on about how they're cushites. If you acknowledge one being a white term, acknowledge the other.
Ignorant. Cushite existed far before Europeans. Also its a real ethnolinguistic group with shared genetic ancestry, language and other aspects of culture.
because somalis are related to afar amhara hararis etc we aren't related to nearly all peoples outside the horn
yet ur annoyed at those who would rather consider themselfs cushites instead of black ur hypocriteWe are humans irregardless of color.
One is based on heritage the other on colour alone. We have nothing in common with blacks minus our skin. With cushites we have a similar culture, language, dna and even ancient religion.
I havent reject the term black on the basis of it being constructed by whites but because it doesn't apply.
Would you reject a medicine because it was created by a white doctor? Not everything should be accepted or rejected based on race. Rather the commonalities and logic instead.
No, the term was used in the old testament.The term came in the 1820s.......
not about whats written kulaha yet ur nevers are poping like fire cracers over the term cushitesScience is logic not about what is written.
That's fine but some people don't claim the term "black" because a white man created it. Then go on about how they're cushites. If you acknowledge one being a white term, acknowledge the other.
I agree with you 100% except for the Amhara bit. They are semetic and descend from South Arabia from a few thousand years ago. Albeit they are mixed with Madows and other groups. But their language is closer to Soqotri or Mehri then cushite languages.because somalis are related to afar amhara hararis etc we aren't related to nearly all peoples outside the horn they are completely foreign to us even arabs across the red sea have more in common with us (inb4 someone calls me arab wannabe coon)