Ok now exclude everyone according to your own criteria.
The day Afweyne fled Muqdisho
- Thread starter Jungle
- Start date
Ok now exclude everyone according to your own criteria.
tyrannicalmanager
pseudo-intellectual
excluding Murtadeen and musrikeen, of course.
tyrannicalmanager
pseudo-intellectual
way too redunant. I was basically saying Kafir 3 times.What about tagawit? Why edit that out?
You used Murtadeen and musrikeen specifically but you left tagawit out because maybe you have a connection to that. And you absolve kacaanka your own words again.
But you are accusing other groups who massacred of kufr, so whats your real belief system?
Last edited:
tyrannicalmanager
pseudo-intellectual
except for ICU or the AS Which groupnin Somalia rules by Quran sunnah after the fall of the Kacaanka?
Which ones? the pagan Oromo cursing Islam or the rebels who sough refuge in Derg ruled Ethiopia?
You seem to apply very different criteria to Kacaanka and other groups. But that's for others to decide.
tyrannicalmanager
pseudo-intellectual
USC won Kacaanka dead, nigga.
They were justt a tool to dissect your fake beliefs lol.
TheLand
VIP
Slow ictiraaf news day, sxb?
Slow ictiraaf news day, sxb?
Dude was trying to claim Kacaanka were the taliban or something? It was just interesting belief system.
tyrannicalmanager
pseudo-intellectual
my argument was that the rebels were just worse as MSB.
Your argument is that you don't want borders between muslims but you are quick to label non-Somali muslims as Kafir before you label Somalil muslims, so your belief system is probably more likely ethnonationalist islamist which is why you still have absolved Kacaanka.
Why compare Kacaanka to anyone? They are absolute failure by your own terms that you readily apply to others but then when pressed you claim Kacaanka is some kind of Taliban group who rules by Quran and sunnah.
Last edited:
tyrannicalmanager
pseudo-intellectual
Which non-Somali muslim did i takfir?
ok but people that ruled after MSB were either just as or even worse than him.
?
Again no point doing comparisons, you can't save Kacaan with comparison to what came after if you claim to have a principle. You can't claim a principle and then switch to being a relativist.
By your own words Kacaanka is like the taliban but we all know how stupid that is and how it sounds.
Anyway no need to go back over it all.
Kacaan was a secular group that ruled through clan supremacy but obviously you were probably a beneficiary of the clan supremacy so you didn't disapprove of it.
Last edited:
tyrannicalmanager
pseudo-intellectual
IDC The regime and MSB died 30+.
no i meant which group in brought Sharia after the secular Kacaanka?
But again you absolve them and you on balance support their rule and actions, despite them being secular group.
But you started with principles. Or maybe it was just a cheap blow that you don't really stand by. But you doubled down a few times after that.
tyrannicalmanager
pseudo-intellectual
If an AS-like group rebelled instead clan based one, the revolt against MSB's regime would be more valid.
IDC about a defunct dictatorship or colonial borders.
If an AS-like group rebelled instead clan based one, the revolt against MSB's regime would be more valid.
IDC about a defunct dictatorship or colonial borders.
Statement 1.
You said it would be more valid? According to what principles and criteria? A secular clan based government over ran by clan based opposition... Why do they need to follow a higher system? Here you are masking something
Statement 2.
You never forget him.
Now statement 2 answer reveals the hidden bias in statement 1 which is like most filthy pragmatists who hide behind principles you value something you don't want to reveal. That is governance. You value goverenance for yourself, even if it means tyranny for others. You see I don't feel that way. I wish you Italian Somalilanders to make the best possible government you can because I'm not a selfish hypocrite.
Last edited:
