THE REALITY OF MADKHALIS (Salafi Publications, CCdawah, Troid Publications, etc exposed)

[Lum]

@Dawo

What haqq? You are on baatil? Those people are liars. I couldn't find any answer in your long text against the Hadith i posted?


So you don’t accept what our prophet pbuh said na’am?


Listen to this! He used to be a khariji listen carefully:

Na’am the truth is clear. The Messenger ﷺ made it clear to us.

 

[nomadicblood]

@Dawo

 

[nomadicblood]

@Dawo
@ibn Yahya Al-Sooli

 

[Ayubi]

@Dawo

Free ebook:

http://www.islamagainstextremism.com/dld.cfm?a=qxufgu



A beautiful reminder to those who incite hatred for Saudi Arab

#Watch #Share

Why do salafis love and defend Saudi Arabia so much?

A response to the present day takfiri khawarij and people of desires/hawa.



Saudi Arabia (The Land of Tawheed)-A Thorn In the throats of the people of Nifaaq and Shiqaaq



Written by The Salafi Centre of Manchester. Posted in Brotherhood



Question to Al-Allaamah Saaleh Al-Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him)



What is your advice to the one who says that this dawlah (state) wages a war against the religion and causes repression against the duat (callers)?



Answer: The Saudi state ever since it began has always aided the religion and its adherents. And it was not founded except upon this basis. And whatever it does at the moment in spending material wealth to support Muslims in every place, setting up centres and mosques, sending duat (to other countries), printing books at the forefront of which is the Noble Quran -, opening centres of learning and faculties of knowledge, and its judging by the Islamic Shariah (Tahkeemuhaa lish-Shareeat il-Islaamiyyah), and also setting up a separate body for enjoining the good and forbidding the evil in every city then all of this is a clear and evident proof of its aid to Islam and its adherents. And this is thorn (shajiyyun, lit. grievance, distress) in the throats of the people of hypocrisy (Ahl un-Nifaq) and the people of evil and dissension (Shiqaq). And Allaah is the Aider of His religion even if the pagans and the biased partisans may detest it.



And we do not say that this state is perfect from every single aspect and that it does not have any mistakes. Mistakes occur by every single person and we ask Allaah that he helps this state in correcting its mistakes.



But if this person (who makes such a claim) was to look at his own self, he would find mistakes that would prevent his tongue from speaking about others and make him feel ashamed of looking at others.



[Comments: So does Shaikh Salih al-Fawzan agree with the Surooriyyah, Khawarij of the Era in their unrestricted Takfir of the hukkam and Muslim states? And does he portray to the masses that the state is apostate because judgement by the Shariah is not to be found there, or because it is not the sole reference point, or that it is being replaced? Rather, his way and methodology is at odds with that of the newly-arisen foolish-minded whose methodology brings about Marxist type revolutions, great upheavals, the shedding of the blood of the innocent and the confiscation of their wealth!! And these words of Shaikh Salih al-Fawzan constitute a “thorn in the throats of the people of hypocrisy (Ahl un-Nifaq) and the people of evil and dissension (Shiqaq)”!! ]



Question: Respected Shaikh, yourself and the your brothers who are Ulamaa in this country are Salafis and all praise is due to Allaah and your method in advising the rulers is that of the Shareeah and as the Prophet (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) has explained and we do not purify over and above Allaahs estimation of him -, yet there are those who find fault with you due to your neglect in openly rejecting the various oppositions [to the Shareeah] that have occurred. And yet others make excuses for you by saying that you are under the control and pressure of the state. So do you have any words of direction of clarification to these people?



Answer: There is no doubt that the rulers just like people besides them are not infallible. Advising them is an obligation. However, attacking them in the gatherings and upon the pulpits is considered to be the forbidden form of backbiting. And this evil (munkar) is greater than that which occurred from the ruler since it is backbiting and because of what results from backbiting such as the sowing of the seeds of discord, causing disunity and affecting the progression of dawah.



Hence what is obligatory is to make sure advice reaches the rulers by sound and trustworthy avenues, not by publicising and causing commotion.



And as for reviling the Scholars of this country, that they do not give advice [to the rulers], or that they are being controlled in their affairs, this is a method by which separation between the Scholars, the youth and the society is desired, until it becomes possible for the mischief-maker to sow the seeds of his evil. This is because when evil suspicions are harboured about the Scholars, trust is no longer placed in them and then the chance is available for the biased partisans to spread their poison.



And I believe that this thought is actually a schemed plot that has come into this country, and those who are behind it are foreign to this country. It is obligatory upon the Muslims to be cautious of it.



[Comments: So will these newly-arisen foolish-minded ones ridicule Shaikh Salih Fawzan for believing in this plot as they have been ridiculing the Salafis for the past decade?! And the spread of Qutubiyyah from the angle and direction of the Ikhwan is what constitutes this schemed plot. Shaikh Saalih al-Fawzaan when he said: “And the end part of that is what we are living in now, the arrival of strange and suspicious ideas in our land in the name of dawah – through the hands of the various groups which are called by various names such as al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimeen, Jamaaat ut-Tabligh and the Jamaaah of such and such. And the goal of all of them is the one and same and that is to drive away the dawah of Tawheed and to take up is place [with something else]. And in reality, the purpose/intent of these groups is not different from the purpose/intent of those who have preceded them from amongst the enemies of this blessed dawah – all of them desire to put an end to it. However the difference between them is only with respect to their plans/modes of action. And if not, then if these groups had desired – truthfully – dawah to Allaah, then why do they overlook and abandon their own countries – from where they are dispatched to us? And yet these same countries are most in need of dawah and rectification. They overlook their own countries and then they come out to battle against the land of Tawheed, desiring to change its correct course of rectification to one that is twisted – and they desire to deceive its youth and to bring about fitnah and enmity between them…” (Haqeeqat ud-Dawah ilallaah of Sad Abdur-Rahmaan al-Haseen). But these foolish ones have never ceased to ridicule the Salafis on account of the same meanings contained in Shaikh Salih al-Fawzans statement above! If they only but knew!]



————————————————————————————————



Source:

Salafi Publications | On Advising Rulers and States Concerning Their Shortcomings

www.takfiris.com

www.islamagainstextremism.com

Why are you defending Saudi for? Do you defend the massacre of Yemenis? Or MBS supporting Israelis/Chinese over oppressed Muslims?

Madhkhalis like you are dumb donkeys wallahi

 

[nomadicblood]

 

[nomadicblood]

 

[nomadicblood]

 

[nomadicblood]

Why are you defending Saudi for? Do you defend the massacre of Yemenis? Or MBS supporting Israelis/Chinese over oppressed Muslims?

Madhkhalis like you are dumb donkeys wallahi

Ya jaahil calling me a donkey. I won’t waste my time on you, boy bye

 

[Ayubi]

Ya jaahil calling me a donkey. I won’t waste my time on you, boy bye

It was a legitimate question you seem you cannot answer, you have absolutely no shame

@ibn Yahya Al-Sooli these weirdos ruined your thread

 

[nomadicblood]

I already replied but you cant read
@Ayubi

 

[nomadicblood]

 

[nomadicblood]

It was a legitimate question you seem you cannot answer, you have absolutely no shame

@ibn Yahya Al-Sooli these weirdos ruined your thread

And we did not ruined his thread ya miskeen. We exposed the lies

 

[nomadicblood]

Go ahead i can share more but you are not truthful may allah guide you all. ISIS are the dogs of hell fire accept that.

 

[nomadicblood]

@ibn Yahya Al-Sooli third time ya miskeen name your scholars

 

[Omar del Sur]

People- be gentle with nomadic.

"Treat women kindly. The woman has been created from a rib (the rib is crooked), and the most crooked part of the rib is in the upper region. If you try to make it straight, you will break it; and if you leave it as it is, it will remain curved. So treat women kindly." [Al-Bukhaari]

Don't be harsh or insulting to her. It's improper. You can disagree but be gentle with her.

 

[Lum]

It was a legitimate question you seem you cannot answer, you have absolutely no shame

@ibn Yahya Al-Sooli these weirdos ruined your thread

We didn’t ruin this thread. @ibn Yahya Al-Sooli mentioned us. Why don’t refute us with ilm (knowledge) ? Insults proves nothing.

 

[المهندس]

@Dawo

What haqq? You are on baatil? Those people are liars. I couldn't find any answer in your long text against the Hadith i posted?


So you don’t accept what our prophet pbuh said na’am?


Listen to this! He used to be a khariji listen carefully:

You're full of xaar spamming this page with biased points of view which go against quran and sunnah.

You think saudi is a muslim state but countless amount of times you have been shown their kufr.

Why do you keep mentioning isis and alqaeda and other random individuals who have nothing to do with the topic.

Khurooj against a kafir ruler like saudi is haqq !!

Your same cult call democratically elected leaders wali al amr

You do know man made laws is not allowed in islam?

So much contradiction

You also admitted you are stubborn no wonder you are attracted to this poisonous ideology.

Spamming videos from madkhalis wont prove anything its the same kharjii this kharjii that

 

[Lum]

Your statement is wrong. Read this akhi.
Questioner:
Some of the people of innovation use the ḥadīth of Abu Hurayrah as evidence for the permissibility of studying under the people of innovation, since Abu Hurayrah took knowledge from Shaytān [as they claim].

Shaykh Ṣāliḥ ibn Fawzān al-Fawzān:
He took knowledge from the Messenger ﷺ. He was the one who informed him of that. He did not take that from Shaytān nor did he rely upon what the Shaytān said. Rather, he relied upon what the Messenger ﷺ said. “He told the truth, [although] he is a great liar.” This is an incorrect deduction. This statement is an example of incorrect reasoning.
Source:

Did Abu Hurayrah Take Knowledge From the Shaytan? – al-Fawzan | Masjid Daar us Sunnah

Questioner: Some of the people of innovation use the ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah as evidence for the permissibility of studying under the people of innovation, since Abū Hurayrah took knowledge from Shaytān [as they claim]. Shaykh Ṣāliḥ ibn Fawzān al-Fawzān: He took knowledge from the Messenger ﷺ. He...

dusunnah.com

@Dawo

 

[Omar del Sur]

I wrote my thoughts on the topic. It ended up being a wall of text so I think I'll put it in a spoiler.

Spoiler: thoughts

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[المهندس]

Your statement is wrong. Read this akhi.
Questioner:
Some of the people of innovation use the ḥadīth of Abu Hurayrah as evidence for the permissibility of studying under the people of innovation, since Abu Hurayrah took knowledge from Shaytān [as they claim].

Shaykh Ṣāliḥ ibn Fawzān al-Fawzān:
He took knowledge from the Messenger ﷺ. He was the one who informed him of that. He did not take that from Shaytān nor did he rely upon what the Shaytān said. Rather, he relied upon what the Messenger ﷺ said. “He told the truth, [although] he is a great liar.” This is an incorrect deduction. This statement is an example of incorrect reasoning.
Source:

Did Abu Hurayrah Take Knowledge From the Shaytan? – al-Fawzan | Masjid Daar us Sunnah

Questioner: Some of the people of innovation use the ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah as evidence for the permissibility of studying under the people of innovation, since Abū Hurayrah took knowledge from Shaytān [as they claim]. Shaykh Ṣāliḥ ibn Fawzān al-Fawzān: He took knowledge from the Messenger ﷺ. He...

dusunnah.com

Khurooj against a kafir ruler is in the sunnah but your beloved madkhalis twist it to protect saudi and blind the masses.


The context i applied it to wasn't batil your talking about those individuals who use the hadith to continue in their blindness such as graveworshippers or shiites.

If a prostitute said to you zina is haram would you agree with her or disagree ?

likewise i agreed with that shaykh who said khurooj against kafir ruler is permissible regardless of his beliefs or what he follows what he said is the truth.