Grigori Rasputin
Former Somali Minister of Mismanagement & Misinfo.
Staff Member
Wariyaha SomaliSpot
The world must apologize to the white men of South Africa. He was right all along. The world now has to deal with these savages
- Thread starter Grigori Rasputin
- Start date
What’s in the water in South Africa? Why do some South African black men specifically cause more violence & rape then any other black group in all of Africa despite living in one of these least poorest countries in Africa? I’m generally curious, even the most degenerate black American gangsters behavior looks civilized in comparison to these South Africans. My question is what’s the reasoning behind all this degeneracy?
KobeBryant
VIP
South Africa is a hardcore place. But places like Gary Indiana, Baltimore, and in places like St. Louis Missouri you got almost same level as this.
i highly doubt that bro. South africa is on par with brazil
The best way to explain the economic situation in South Africa is this.
Bear with me and pls read it cos it took some time thx.
Imagine you lived in a share house with x amount of people. Using force or other means, you have decided to make sure all money generated by people in the share house goes to yourself as well as developing your side of the share house. You also inform your housemates that you will not let them leave or get a different stream of income.
This continues for a while and your side of the house becomes opulent whilst the rest of the house decays.
Now there is an intervention and you have all decided to share the money equally. However, in dividing the money equally, there is simply not enough money to fix the decay that has happened to the rest of the share house. The money was enough to either maintain everybody or make one person wealthy but not enough to make everybody wealthy.
Now imagine, being those housemates who thought that with the money being shared, their sides of the house will reach the same level of opulence as your room. You're not going to be happy?
Now imagine, that there was a vacant room in the house and someone new has come in. Now, there is another person in the house and are also looking to better their living situation despite not being present during this entire debacle. That is the situation the Somalis are in from the SA perspective.
Bear with me and pls read it cos it took some time thx.
Imagine you lived in a share house with x amount of people. Using force or other means, you have decided to make sure all money generated by people in the share house goes to yourself as well as developing your side of the share house. You also inform your housemates that you will not let them leave or get a different stream of income.
This continues for a while and your side of the house becomes opulent whilst the rest of the house decays.
Now there is an intervention and you have all decided to share the money equally. However, in dividing the money equally, there is simply not enough money to fix the decay that has happened to the rest of the share house. The money was enough to either maintain everybody or make one person wealthy but not enough to make everybody wealthy.
Now imagine, being those housemates who thought that with the money being shared, their sides of the house will reach the same level of opulence as your room. You're not going to be happy?
Now imagine, that there was a vacant room in the house and someone new has come in. Now, there is another person in the house and are also looking to better their living situation despite not being present during this entire debacle. That is the situation the Somalis are in from the SA perspective.
Last edited:
Post it. These people are bloody savages
elite1337
VIP
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
elite1337
VIP
Yeah he died unfortunately AUNOmg did he die?Black South Africans are Fucking savages I despise them.
South Africa isn't a failure of blacks. It is a failure of communism.
South Africa isn't a failure of blacks. It is a failure of communism.
The ANC were capitalist when they took over in 1994. This is a recycled apartheid-era talking point.
The National Party (apartheid gov't) used define communism as:
"Any scheme aimed at achieving change—whether economic, social, political, or industrial—"by the promotion of disturbance or disorder" or any act encouraging "feelings of hostility between the European and the non-European races [...] calculated to further [disorder]"
So anyone that wanted to change the racial status quo in Sth Africa was deemed communist.
This is not to say Mandela was not a member of the Communist Party, he was. But the idea that he was plotting to implent/implemented a communist regime was propaganda to maintain Western support for the apartheid regime.
Do better.
Last edited:
The ANC were capitalist when they took over in 1994.
This is a recycled apartheid-era talking point.
so communists just backed Mandela and them out of sheer idealism and there is no connection between the South Africa government and Communism?
my view is an apartheid-era talking point because I think we should blame communism rather than blacks? I mean, sure.... wasn't color television popularized during the apartheid-era? so if I watch a color television, I am utilizing apartheid-era technology and I have something to do with apartheid because I watch a color tv?
I edited my post, go look at it again.
The apartheid-era government broadened the definition of communism to include anti-apartheid organisations in order to maintain support for apartheid.
trying to say "Omar del Sur thinks Mandela and them had something to do with Communism.... the apartheid SA regime also thought that!" is the same logic as the "Hitler drank water" thing....
the Boers chose to set up their shop in South Africa and they got what was pretty much inevitable.... but it was true that Communists genuinely were helping out the Mandela types....
is objective reality an apartheid conspiracy? Fidel and Mandela.... did they listen to the same rock music or something? they just happened to bump into each other and pose like best buddies? birds of a feather don't flock together?
As I stated to you in another thread, Mandela was sympathetic to communism.
But the idea that he was planning to implement or implemented a communist government in South Africa was a fallacy painted by the National Party in order to maintain global support for apartheid.
Read this wikipedia article about the Suppression of Communism Act of 1950.
Suppression of Communism Act, 1950 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I don't know if that's true but I don't believe it.
the boers were in a terrible situation.... and it was their own fault.... they were between either running a colonial government or letting communist-backed people take power.... same in Zimbabwe.... it's their own fault for setting themselves up to end up in that kind of situation.... I don't support the colonial state that they ran but that doesn't mean everything they said was not true.... it's well known that Cuba had a big role in bringing them down... people here should understand about Cuban foreign policy in Africa... Cuba definitely has played a role in opposing imperialism (except Soviet imperialism, of course).... it is undeniable that they helped bring down the SA apartheid state.... but that help comes at a price.... anyone who knows anything about Cuban foreign policy- and I do- should understand this.... they weren't just backing the FMLN in El Salvador, Nicaragua Sandinistas, Mandela and them... unless there would be some gain to communistic interests.... I honestly don't know very much about Mandela and SA.... but the Cubans are very familiar to me
