Ibn Battuta didn't encounter Abubakar bin Fakhruddin Al Qassani's grandsonThis is a lie. Ibn Battuta called his grandson a barbaric name
Ibn Battuta didn't encounter Abubakar bin Fakhruddin Al Qassani's grandsonThis is a lie. Ibn Battuta called his grandson a barbaric name
Didnt I already proved to u that I have a forefather that is buried in MogadishuBanaadir is plural of Bandar which in this context means coastal city it's word of Persian origin frequently used in Arabic, there aren't any ancient reer samaale tombs in xamar ,none of the gibil madow reer xamar clans or families that claim to be from samaale clans in the interior claim any of the ancient graves, all the ancient graves are of Arabs and persians .
Ibn Battuta didn't encounter Abubakar bin Fakhruddin Al Qassani's grandson
Banu Harith is a tribe that exists till this day in arabia ,you can't declare a tribe to be non-existent for your own interest.Al-hilwani and Banu Harith, never existed
That's not ancient and I've been told by reliable sources that his body was brought to xamar recentlyDidnt I already proved to u that I have a forefather that is buried in Mogadishu
Show it to me then?That's not ancient and I've been told by reliable sources that his body was brought to xamar recently
Which century did ibn Batuta encounter Abubakar bin Shaykh Omar and which century did Abubakar bin Fakhruddin rule? You'll find your answers when you find out the answers to those two questions
Show what?Show it to me then?
Abubakar is a somaliWhich century did ibn Batuta encounter Abubakar bin Shaykh Omar and which century did Abubakar bin Fakhruddin rule? You'll find your answers when you find out the answers to those two questions
Prove it to me that his body was brought to xamar??Show what?
Sharif Aidour's book is not a sourceBanu Harith is a tribe that exists till this day in arabia ,you can't declare a tribe to be non-existent for your own interest.
View attachment 284789
If you didn't know about hilwani dynasty, you can read on it here.
I don't need to prove it , thats what's known amongst reer xamarsProve it to me that his body was brought to xamar??
Which century did ibn Batuta encounter Abubakar bin Shaykh Omar and which century did Abubakar bin Fakhruddin rule? You'll find your answers when you find out the answers to those two questions
Coastal somalis.Who are those coastal Somalis? What tribe do they belong to , who are their modern day descendants?
I don't need to prove it , thats what's known amongst reer xamars
You're claiming shariif Caydaruus book isn't a source when you're using his sons book, and that page just further proves my point, there were two centuries in-between Abubakar bin Fakhruddin Al Qassani and Abubakar bin Shaykh Omar. Also if you actually read my source you'd see that shariif Caydaruus mentions at the beginning that he found it in a manuscript written by Shaykh Muhyiddin bin Mu'allim Mukarram which was in the library of his son Shaykh Abubakar bin Shaykh Muhyiddin.Sharif Aidour's book is not a sourceView attachment 284790
I didn't say they're not, there's groups like jaaji and certain daroods that fish ,you didn't provide a sufficient answer to my questionCoastal somalis.
Literally just somalis who live on the coast. You think somalis were allergic to water and only stayed in arid lands instead of setting towns in the coastline? You lot are ridiculous
Those aren't banadiri sources, them claiming Abubakar bin Shaykh Omar to be descendant of Abubakar bin Fakhruddin Al Qassani is merely based upon assumptions
Banadri sources is biased manuscripts written in the Omani eraThose aren't banadiri sources, them claiming Abubakar bin Shaykh Omar to be descendant of Abubakar bin Fakhruddin Al Qassani is merely based upon assumptions