Can you summarize the message in this for me?
Please doCan make an individual thread on this some time later
It takes just 2% of upright people that are united to control an entire nation, irrespective of foreign interference, if you have more than 2% you practically become unstoppable.The issue is that the system is foreign un-Islamic and designed to be dysfunctional.
It is designed to put the worst in charge and disempower the best of us.
That is what happened to the Muslim world. If today the system was changed and a better more Islamic system that united the country was put in place they would invade it and destroy it.
It is not anything inherently wrong with Somalis who are good people and it is not tribalism. A lot of that is also pushed from the outside by foreign backers. It is that the worst are put up as leadership by design, and the most decent of them could not change much as the whole things is made to be a quagmire.
I remember listening to a lecture about this verse and the speaker was saying it is the same with the reverse. When another power conquers you they make the noblest the lowest and elevate the lowest people to serve them dutifully.
She said: "Verily kings, when they enter a town (country), they despoil it and make the most honourable amongst its people the lowest. And thus they do.
Surah An-Naml 34
Anyway @Idilinaa has made some really informative posts on this.
A monarchy would have been great in theory had a royal dynasty been in place during the founding of Somalia. A great alternative would be a religious council devised of ulema selected from each clan. A supreme leader would be appointed every 15-25 years from this council as the head of state. Their term should be long enough for stability purposes. The president would be the head of the government with an elected legislative body and judicial appointed by the council of ulema to provide a check and balance on the executive.Somalia needs a lifetime Head of State, but while still having elections. Africans can't handle Presidentialism.
A monarchy like Jordan would be good, and rotate the PM all the time. Basically everytime something goes wrong the shacab can blame the PM and cabinet while still having some respect for the head of state
If we did a swap and moved the entire Iranian population to Somalia and all of the Somalis to Iran.A monarchy would have been great in theory had a royal dynasty been in place during the founding of Somalia. A great alternative would be a religious council devised of ulema selected from each clan. A supreme leader would be appointed every 15-25 years from this council as the head of state. Their term should be long enough for stability purposes. The president would be the head of the government with an elected legislative body and judicial appointed by the council of ulema to provide a check and balance on the executive.
Iran with a 4.5 twist, lol.