Who told these idiots about the...

[Lightshow]

Why am I seeing idiots post 'hey do you know that we are 60% Nilotic and 40% Eurasian, Natufian but not exactly Natufian bla bla bla" bullshit on nearly every comment section on content related to Somali or Horn African phenotype?

What are you gaining by making these statements? They are not correct and can easily by dismissed and changed in light of new evidence. We already know that it's not even Nilotic ancestry that we have now, but some sort of extinct ancient East African.

Soomali af dheeraa, waa dad mucjiso ah. Tell them a tid bit of info and they run with it like wild hyenas crying from every mountain top. Truly astonishing people

 

[wonyluvr]

People are gonna start insulting our non-Somali ancestors why cant people shut up

 

[JustSomeGuy]

Why am I seeing idiots post 'hey do you know that we are 60% Nilotic and 40% Eurasian, Natufian but not exactly Natufian bla bla bla" bullshit on nearly every comment section on content related to Somali or Horn African phenotype?

What are you gaining by making these statements? They are not correct and can easily by dismissed and changed in light of new evidence. We already know that it's not even Nilotic ancestry that we have now, but some sort of extinct ancient East African.

Soomali af dheeraa, waa dad mucjiso ah. Tell them a tid bit of info and they run with it like wild hyenas crying from every mountain top. Truly astonishing people

Extinct ancient East African? Source?

 

[Lightshow]

Extinct ancient East African? Source?

Hey did you know we are 60% Nilotic and 40% Eurasian?

 

[JustSomeGuy]

Hey did you know we are 60% Nilotic and 40% Eurasian?

I don’t know much that’s why I asked

 

[Vividlaaiznimo]

Why am I seeing idiots post 'hey do you know that we are 60% Nilotic and 40% Eurasian, Natufian but not exactly Natufian bla bla bla" bullshit on nearly every comment section on content related to Somali or Horn African phenotype?

What are you gaining by making these statements? They are not correct and can easily by dismissed and changed in light of new evidence. We already know that it's not even Nilotic ancestry that we have now, but some sort of extinct ancient East African.

Soomali af dheeraa, waa dad mucjiso ah. Tell them a tid bit of info and they run with it like wild hyenas crying from every mountain top. Truly astonishing people

Their dumbasses don’t realize they’re attributing our features/ beauty to some extent to our natufian like ancestors when we don’t know what the indigenous African side looked like. They indirectly shit on a large portion of what makes us, us. Idk anthropology is way too Eurocentric so it makes sense ig

 

[bluebird]

I looked up natufian because it sounds like a cool ancient civilization (actually, the name sounds kind of gross), but it was just images of some neanderthal looking people LOL.

for all we know it could have happened in the reverse.

 

[Internet Nomad]

The democratisation of information has done irreparable damage to the mind of the average serf. We need to go back to the days where education and high class thought was gate kept through financial and social means.

I don’t want to hear a nigga talk about punt in broken english from a tin house in somalia it makes the topic look cringe.

 

[The truth seeker]

The slaves will argue about there heritage as if it will mater in the next century when 80 percent of the world will no longer be whith us

 

[Nilotic]

Nilotes (Dinka-Nuer), Saharans (Nubians, Toubou) and Cushites (Somalis) share common Paleolithic Ancestral East African ancestors. The Dinka have this ancestry at 80%, hence why people just call it Proto-Nilotic.

 

[Bior]

Why am I seeing idiots post 'hey do you know that we are 60% Nilotic and 40% Eurasian, Natufian but not exactly Natufian bla bla bla" bullshit on nearly every comment section on content related to Somali or Horn African phenotype?

What are you gaining by making these statements? They are not correct and can easily by dismissed and changed in light of new evidence. We already know that it's not even Nilotic ancestry that we have now, but some sort of extinct ancient East African.

Soomali af dheeraa, waa dad mucjiso ah. Tell them a tid bit of info and they run with it like wild hyenas crying from every mountain top. Truly astonishing people

I as a dinka am very skeptical of this "ancestral East African" component, the "proto mota coordinate" which is what its based off of from vahaduo was an edited version of the Ethiopian hg mota samaple which was supposed to be the version of the sample with Khoisan like ancestry and some southern Arabian like ancestry removed from it, but its not even a real dna sample, and we don't even know how accurate it is, people just run with it because it fits well with Cushitic groups in their g25 models, but its garbage on nilote groups, for all we know it could just be because of drift, or bottle neck or whatever. We don't even know how accurate it is, cause dna is all about references, and on vahaduo, all it really is, is a more exaggerated East African shifted coordinate, so since its higher up on the cline it by default gives already nilote and nilo saharan groups west africans because these 2 components (East African nilote and west African ancestry) work like polar opposites, so if I create a "more East African"coordinate, the previous "East African" coordinate picks up some west African dna. its better to wait until we have actual ancient samples of nilotes and other nilo Sahara groups before making such claims. Maybe there's some truth but we dont know how accurate these models are.

 

[olore]

I as a dinka am very skeptical of this "ancestral East African" component, the "proto mota coordinate" which is what its based off of from vahaduo was an edited version of the Ethiopian hg mota samaple which was supposed to be the version of the sample with Khoisan like ancestry and some southern Arabian like ancestry removed from it, but its not even a real dna sample, and we don't even know how accurate it is, people just run with it because it fits well with Cushitic groups in their g25 models, but its garbage on nilote groups, for all we know it could just be because of drift, or bottle neck or whatever. We don't even know how accurate it is, cause dna is all about references, and on vahaduo, all it really is, is a more exaggerated East African shifted coordinate, so since its higher up on the cline it by default gives already nilote and nilo saharan groups west africans because these 2 components (East African nilote and west African ancestry) work like polar opposites, so if I create a "more East African"coordinate, the previous "East African" coordinate picks up some west African dna. its better to wait until we have actual ancient samples of nilotes and other nilo Sahara groups before making such claims. Maybe there's some truth but we dont know how accurate these models are.

I had a feeling the west african-like dna in Nilotic groups could be inflated/exaggerated for nilotics but do you think the nilotic present in somalis are that different from present day nilotics. The original post is making it seem like it’s completely different, personally I don’t agree with that we need more information but it is annoying when somali who have not that much knowledge on genetics go around saying our genetic break-down in comment sections bec we are our own ethnic group now we don’t have to latch on to ancient ancestors. What I hate the most is people mentioning that eurasian dna I wish we never had that fucking shit and when I look at some somalis it doesn’t even look like they even have it. It’s low-key watered down ahhh eurasian. So it’s soo cringe when they go around saying it.