a somali thats being anti somal
a somali thats being anti somal
@Waaqo of Punt are you a proud or a proud al sumal answer me ass liker
Proud Somaal dude@Waaqo of Punt are you a proud or a proud al sumal answer me ass liker
Proud Somaal dude
I'll debate as I see fit. lolthen stop defending s that all i ask of you
habashes never made it out of the highlands while somalis amde it all the way to sri lanka maldivies and became the first african ambasador to china
Waaqo of punt is either a Somali coon or a habesha creature this nigga really thinks habesha cavemen have a better maritime history than us@Waaqo of Punt your understimating somalis, they destroyed an ethiopian invading force led by menalik fresh from his conquests and annihilated them at the battle of luuq with 200 soldiers returning alive. somalis have fought the portoguese in naval warfere in kenya somalia and even the maldives defeating them several times, somalis even had join naval patrols seizing omani slave shipping and helped enforce the slavery ban with the united states military
i wouldnt say somalis are the best fighters but they are up their with the best fighters of the world
How is that impressive? Look at how small and irrelevant he Maldives is. They didn't even have to fight anyone when they gt there, lol. One could say that Xabashiis colonised Yemen and southern Saudi and left a genetic trace there. There's even a city in Yemen called 'Habash' and a cathedral built by the general Abraha. The Arabs got absolutely karbash-ed by the Axumites.Waaqo of punt is either a Somali coon or a habesha creature this nigga really thinks habesha cavemen have a better maritime history than us View attachment 81024
Bro, You can't compare Ethiopian which is a nationality to a Somali which is an ethnicity! that's an unfair comparison. If your comparing Ethnicity then compare Somalis to Oromos, Amharas or Tigrayans, Somalis win at the top against these individual ethnic groups. (I'm not condoning ethnic arrogance in my post as it's haram in itself)Uhm...so did xabeshas...Axum extended all the way to Persia and India/Sri Lanka. They were on par with the Romans, Persians, Chinese, and had their own gold currency. Somalia used it's strategic location and free ports + had Muslim ties whereas Axum reached al those places alone, there wasn't a nearby Christian power. Just my thoughts
Axum was pretty much just Tigrayan and Amharas are pretty much the same as Tigrayans. Plus we're comparing empires, doesn't really matter what tribes ruled them.Actually, it's more impressive cus they could achievie so much even though they had differences in language and religion (if u count Oromos that joined Ethiopia). Our little tribal skirmishes are a joke compared to the real ethnic conflicts in Ethiopia today. Nobody is dumb enough to divide into tribes and sub-tribes in the 20th Century...yet here we are.Bro, You can't compare Ethiopian which is a nationality to a Somali which is an ethnicity! that's an unfair comparison. If your comparing Ethnicity then compare Somalis to Oromos, Amharas or Tigrayans, Somalis win at the top against these individual ethnic groups. (I'm not condoning ethnic arrogance in my post as it's haram in itself)
Axum wasn't Amhara or Tigrayan, They spoke a different language and they were their own Habesha ethnicity (They spoke Geez I think). If Axum was Amhara/Tigrayan then Axum should also be belong to Hararis and other Habesha ethnic groups using your logic.Axum was pretty much just Tigrayan and Amharas are pretty much the same as Tigrayans. Plus we're comparing empires, doesn't really matter what tribes ruled them.Actually, it's more impressive cus they could achievie so much even though they had differences in language and religion (if u count Oromos that joined Ethiopia). Our little tribal skirmishes are a joke compared to the real ethnic conflicts in Ethiopia today. Nobody is dumb enough to divide into tribes and sub-tribes in the 20th Century...yet here we are.
1. Why are you talking about the Maldives?How is that impressive? Look at how small and irrelevant he Maldives is. They didn't even have to fight anyone when they gt there, lol. One could say that Xabashiis colonised Yemen and southern Saudi and left a genetic trace there. There's even a city in Yemen called 'Habash' and a cathedral built by the general Abraha. The Arabs got absolutely karbash-ed by the Axumites.
View attachment 81025
I don't think Axum had anything to do with any Ethnicity in Ethiopia/Eritrea since they spoke a different language so this "glorious Axum" fantasy current Habesha's propagate is insignificant to them. Axumites were a different Habesha ethnicity different to the ones that exist today. That's like Oromos claiming Somali history just because there Cushitic just like Somalis or Jews claiming Arab history just because there both Semites. @Waaqo of Punt should compare each Ethio Ethnic groups to Somalis instead of nationality.1. Why are you talking about the Maldives?
2. Conquering Yemenis doesn’t mean you have better maritime history
3.give me studies that say Axum left a genetic trace in Yemen and Saudia Arabia
4. There’s a lot of cities in Yemen named after somalis https://www.somalispot.com/threads/map-of-yemeni-towns-named-after-somalis-and-other-africans.58743/
Dude Axumites were Tigrayit people AKA Tigrinyas and Tigres (in Eritrea). They spoke Ge'ez and Tigrinya and Amxaric are in fact descendants of Ge'ez. They still speak Ge'ez but only in their churches. Just cus Italians don't speak Latin anymore it doens't mean they aren't descendants of Romans. lol. Hararis are a mix of xabashas and a few other groups who developed their own culture over time, it's a different thing.Axum wasn't Amhara or Tigrayan, They spoke a different language and they were their own Habesha ethnicity (They spoke Geez I think). If Axum was Amhara/Tigrayan then Axum should also be belong to Hararis and other Habesha ethnic groups using your logic.
My point is to stop comparing a nationality to an ethnicity! Compare each individual Ethnicity (history, politics, Wealth, strength, dominance) to Somalis and we'll easily come at the top. If Somalis never had clan rivalry, we'd easily dominate East Africa and other areas of the world.
Well there u go, Tigrayans would come on top. They've founded several empires after Axum and even before it. Somalis were united with Gurey and still got defeated so saying "but if we never had tribal conflict" doesn't work. We still got defeated. Same thing in '77. History speaks for itself. If anything, Ethios have had less unity than Somlais ever did. If there was no ethnic conflict in Ethiopia they'd be much stronger.My point is to stop comparing a nationality to an ethnicity! Compare each individual Ethnicity (history, politics, Wealth, strength, dominance) to Somalis and we'll easily come at the top. If Somalis never had clan rivalry, we'd easily dominate East Africa and other areas of the world.
1. Why are you talking about the Maldives?
2. Conquering Yemenis doesn’t mean you have a better maritime history
3.give me studies that say Axum left a genetic trace in Yemen and Saudia Arabia
4. There’s a lot of cities in Yemen named after somalis https://www.somalispot.com/threads/map-of-yemeni-towns-named-after-somalis-and-other-africans.58743/
abti all i see is a puny wall which is the height of labo cunug oo saqiir ah. All that remains of this kaniisad is the ironic story of how a Meccan pagan defiled the church and how Abraha in typical habesha fashion sent elephants only to get karbaashed by shimbir yar yar throwing pebbles. "Fa jacalahum kacasfin ma'kuul." - Al-Fil 105:5 "And He made them like eaten straw"2)
This was a church built by the Axumite general Abraha during the conquest of Yemen and it still stands today. In the nustling and important city of Sana'a...
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al%E2%80%93Qalis_Church,_Sana%27a)
dude it's the remains. The cathedral must've been proper. Also the story of the elephant has to be taken with a grain of salt. There's so many loopholes in the story (I don't take evrything literally).abti all i see is a puny wall which is the height of labo cunug oo saqiir ah. All that remains of this kaniisad is the ironic story of how a Meccan pagan defiled the church and how Abraha in typical habesha fashion sent elephants only to get karbaashed by shimbir yar yar throwing pebbles. "Fa jacalahum kacasfin ma'kuul." - Al-Fil 105:5 "And He made them like eaten straw"
That's the legacy. And ironically eaten straw and a tree is all what this wall seems to guard.
Khaniis Shakespeare is Somali
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
...that was quite cathartic, I have to admit.
Is he really comparing the 20 km sunday swim his skinny-dipping no-good-for-nothing ancestors took in our back-waters of the red-sea to the GLORIOUS SOMALI-MARITIME-HISTORY?
He doesn't even use a map which reads Axum instead of Somalia. Wllhi you must be trolling in order to induce dhiig-kar in every self-respecting geel-jirre.
YOU DON'T HAVE A FUCKING COASTLINE WHEREAS
WE HAVE THE LONGEST IN MAINLAND AFRICA.
Open-and-shut case.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
First time posting might also be the last, I'm loosing braincells by the minute as I lurk in certain sections, but also a lot of good banter.
I said what I said, let's hear his rebuttal: "Bla bla bla 1977 bla bla bla civil war."You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
@Jiron don't bother opening the spoilers, although I'd like to think that you would find something positive to say anyway
It's true. The colonial media tried to hide Shkaspeare true name which is 'Sheikhs-Bir'. I believe he has MJ ancestry which would explain his high intelligence.Khaniis Shakespeare is Somali
Bismillaaah! It all makes sense, he was writing his poems to different geeljiresIt's true. The colonial media tried to hide Shkaspeare true name which is 'Sheikhs-Bir'. I believe he has MJ ancestry which would explain his high intelligence.