Albino somali?

What do you mean by caucasian phenotype ? The somalis i see don't look like caucasian. they look like black people with narrower nose and slightly softer hair. Even chinese kids can tell somali people are black.

This is how average somali looks like. Caucasian where ?

IMG_2807.jpeg
I can see two bantuweyn in the back. Xamar cadey The kinshasa of the horn :lol:
 
You don't get my point. Find another ethnic group that's not Dominican, Horner or Fulani that has this range of phenotype.

Look at Suldaan Seraar and then look at Sh. Shariif. As Somalis we can quickly point out that they're Somali, I don't know how but we can, even though they have completely different phenotypes.

Compare Barkhad Abdi and Abdullahi Yusuf, both look very Somali but have different phenotypes. We are unique in that sense, we don't have one look.
Anyone who doesn’t understand this fact hasn’t interacted with enough Somalis. End of.
 

die

i be lurking sometimes
i've met a somali albino dude on eid a few years ago, he had more dhaqan than me lmao. not surprising though as he is still somali.
 

Shimbiris

بىَر غىَل إيؤ عآنؤ لؤ
VIP
What do you mean by caucasian phenotype ? The somalis i see don't look like caucasian. they look like black people with narrower nose and slightly softer hair. Even chinese kids can tell somali people are black.

This is how average somali looks like. Caucasian where ?

IMG_2807.jpeg

I hate using these dweeby, outdated terms but we do indeed have a mostly "Caucasoid" cranioform. This has been scientifically proven:

y0.png



No nitpicking pictures, just cold hard data and craniofacial measurements. We cluster almost identically to our pre-historic ancestors from Egypt (represented by Naqada Bronze Age above) who were probably Cushitic speakers. But our actual genomic heritage is more half:half SSA ("Negroid") and and MENA with in fact a stronger skew toward SSA. What happened with our cranioform was probably a combination of dumb "luck" and selection.

Not to mention that the so-called "Caucasoid" phenotype probably originated in part through "Negroid" admixture itself. Modern Western Eurasians and their Neolithic ancestors don't at all look like their Paleolithic ancestors like the Upper Paleolithic Europeans who cluster to the south near the Iberomaurusians above. They instead have a distinct cranioform that the paper I linked to in part believes was formed through Sub-Saharan admixture that expresses itself most strongly in Natufians:

6ONeVlp.png


This is actually a key part of that paper. The author identifies that something new entered the West-Eurasian craniomorphic profile during the Neolithic and it peaks in Natufians and it seems obvious that something new is ANA admixture as it looks SSA/"Negroid" from what you can see above.

Interestingly, Iberomaurusians, don't show as much of this SSA/"Negroid" shift even though they're genetically roughly 50:50. They seem like a Somali-like situation where their cranioform, through various coincidences and means, favored one side of their heritage far more but Natufians seem to show much more of what the ANAs likely looked like in cranioform and are the epicenter of this phenotypic element in West-Eurasians that differentiates the Neolithic farmers and later WEs from their UP ancestors and pulls them to some extent toward SSAs.
 
I hate using these dweeby, outdated terms but we do indeed have a mostly "Caucasoid" cranioform. This has been scientifically proven:

y0.png



No nitpicking pictures, just cold hard data and craniofacial measurements. We cluster almost identically to our pre-historic ancestors from Egypt (represented by Naqada Bronze Age above) who were probably Cushitic speakers. But our actual genomic heritage is more half:half SSA ("Negroid") and and MENA with in fact a stronger skew toward SSA. What happened with our cranioform was probably a combination of dumb "luck" and selection.

Not to mention that the so-called "Caucasoid" phenotype probably originated in part through "Negroid" admixture itself. Modern Western Eurasians and their Neolithic ancestors don't at all look like their Paleolithic ancestors like the Upper Paleolithic Europeans who cluster to the south near the Iberomaurusians above. They instead have a distinct cranioform that the paper I linked to in part believes was formed through Sub-Saharan admixture that expresses itself most strongly in Natufians:

6ONeVlp.png


This is actually a key part of that paper. The author identifies that something new entered the West-Eurasian craniomorphic profile during the Neolithic and it peaks in Natufians and it seems obvious that something new is ANA admixture as it looks SSA/"Negroid" from what you can see above.

Interestingly, Iberomaurusians, don't show as much of this SSA/"Negroid" shift even though they're genetically roughly 50:50. They seem like a Somali-like situation where their cranioform, through various coincidences and means, favored one side of their heritage far more but Natufians seem to show much more of what the ANAs likely looked like in cranioform and are the epicenter of this phenotypic element in West-Eurasians that differentiates the Neolithic farmers and later WEs from their UP ancestors and pulls them to some extent toward SSAs.
Bro nobody cares about your pseudo science in real life. The truth is are ethnic somalis considered black in africa, europe, asia, north and south america and australia? The answer is yes and we all know it. You are what the world considers you to be. And that is black my nigga
 

Shimbiris

بىَر غىَل إيؤ عآنؤ لؤ
VIP
Bro nobody cares about your pseudo science in real life. The truth is are ethnic somalis considered black in africa, europe, asia, north and south america and australia? The answer is yes and we all know it. You are what the world considers you to be. And that is black my nigga

You're barking up the wrong tree, walaal. I genuinely dislike terms like Caucasoid and Negroid. They are indeed pseudoscience and nonsense. Human beings don't exist in these discrete "races". We are all in fact genetic mixes of very distinct ancient populations, even madows and cadaans. That study I linked itself is also anti such terminologies. The author never uses them even once and has written against them in other publications.

What he is doing otherwise is very much a real hard, statistical science. He measures various dimensions of the human cranioform and clusters people based on them and his insights are pretty cool regardless of who takes interest. You don't think it's interesting that the "cadaan" phenotype literally in part exists because of the madow phenotype? As in their precious "Caucasoid" features literally exist in part cos of so-called "Negroid" admixture. I find that pretty beautiful and funny. The way humanity is so interconnected in reality when we approach things with real science like pop-genetics and craniometric data. Suit yourself if you don't.

You're also barking up the wrong tree in terms of being "black". My views are pretty much like yours:

Post by me almost verbatim saying what you are

You should read what people post carefully instead of getting triggered then replying. We're on the same side, nigga.
 

Trending

Top