All Chinese majority countries and territories are successful

[Odayga_Jabuuti]

This is something that I have noticed a while ago.
If you look at chinese majority countries and territories : Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, Heinan, Singapore, Mainland China.
All of them are first world countries/territories except mainland China which will soon become first world this decade.
There are many arab countries but not all of them are successful, same for turkic (Azerbaidjan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Turkey etc...), persian countries (Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Iran etc...).
If we compare it to somali majority countries like Somalia and Djibouti, (2 countries that have one of the worst human development index) there is a large difference.
What are they doing that we are not doing? What should we learn from them?

 

[Juliet]

Hmmmm, they're not in the middle of a war on terror? Therefore security isn't scaring away investors and hindering economic growth? Also, they're leaders aren't the typical caqli dameer (puppet) African ones that are OK with their people living in poverty so long as they live well? I have a feeling you posted this so you can get the typical "Low IQ" answers

 

[Odayga_Jabuuti]

Hmmmm, they're not in the middle of a war on terror? Therefore security isn't scaring away investors and hindering economic growth? Also, they're leaders aren't the typical caqli dameer (puppet) African ones that are OK with their people living in poverty so long as they live well? I have a feeling you posted this so you can get the typical "Low IQ" answers

Yes but somalis are to blame for their wars, poverties etc...
Only the iraqis can complain about their war since it's because of an invasion and not because of themselves.
Somalia independant for 60 years, Djibouti 40 years none of them are second world countries.

 

[celidheere]

That region of the world has always been successful because it’s very fertile and the people have high IQs. Also there’s a collectivist mentality that has been around for centuries, ever since China had the heavenly emperor. The identity of being a Han Chinese is something that they all identify with so they can work together quite easily. On an individual level Chinese people are quite worthless because there is so many of them so they are mostly hard working because of necessity. Also because of their population they have access to an unending number of cheap labour so can build up infrastructure very very easily. They also have very good administrative skills that go back centuries so are able to plan well and execute.

 

[Yukon_Niner]

Don't overthrow your dictator

 

[SOMALI GENERAL]

Bamboo Network:

 

[Basra]

This is something that I have noticed a while ago.
If you look at chinese majority countries and territories : Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, Heinan, Singapore, Mainland China.
All of them are first world countries/territories except mainland China which will soon become first world this decade.
There are many arab countries but not all of them are successful, same for turkic (Azerbaidjan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Turkey etc...), persian countries (Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Iran etc...).
If we compare it to somali majority countries like Somalia and Djibouti, (2 countries that have one of the worst human development index) there is a large difference.
What are they doing that we are not doing? What should we learn from them?

And the entire African huge continent, not one country is a first world. HA HA HA HA HA

 

[adventurequestworlds1.0.2]

Yes but somalis are to blame for their wars, poverties etc...
Only the iraqis can complain about their war since it's because of an invasion and not because of themselves.
Somalia independant for 60 years, Djibouti 40 years none of them are second world countries.

 

[exposedmeat]

This is something that I have noticed a while ago.
If you look at chinese majority countries and territories : Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, Heinan, Singapore, Mainland China.
All of them are first world countries/territories except mainland China which will soon become first world this decade.
There are many arab countries but not all of them are successful, same for turkic (Azerbaidjan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Turkey etc...), persian countries (Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Iran etc...).
If we compare it to somali majority countries like Somalia and Djibouti, (2 countries that have one of the worst human development index) there is a large difference.
What are they doing that we are not doing? What should we learn from them?

we need Chinese whether u like it or not they are more civilized than cadaans

 

[Omar del Sur]

 

[Amirah]

This is something that I have noticed a while ago.
If you look at chinese majority countries and territories : Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, Heinan, Singapore, Mainland China.
All of them are first world countries/territories except mainland China which will soon become first world this decade.
There are many arab countries but not all of them are successful, same for turkic (Azerbaidjan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Turkey etc...), persian countries (Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Iran etc...).
If we compare it to somali majority countries like Somalia and Djibouti, (2 countries that have one of the worst human development index) there is a large difference.
What are they doing that we are not doing? What should we learn from them?

Simple - it’s called high IQ. Both Chinese and cadaans have high IQ, hence why they have the most prosperous developed countries in the world. High IQ will take you far even when you don’t have the resources, low IQ will fail you even if you have abundance of resources, hence Africa.

 

[HiraanBorn]

This is something that I have noticed a while ago.
If you look at chinese majority countries and territories : Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, Heinan, Singapore, Mainland China.
All of them are first world countries/territories except mainland China which will soon become first world this decade.
There are many arab countries but not all of them are successful, same for turkic (Azerbaidjan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Turkey etc...), persian countries (Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Iran etc...).
If we compare it to somali majority countries like Somalia and Djibouti, (2 countries that have one of the worst human development index) there is a large difference.
What are they doing that we are not doing? What should we learn from them?

The Chinese as a whole are a very productive race, who can recall a several millennia history of state centralization and this also includes their hard-working ethics and refined culture. Africa on the other hand doesn't have any history of state centralization of complex societies on par with Europe and Asia except for a few areas like Egypt, parts of North Africa etc.

 

[celidheere]

Simple - it’s called high IQ. Both Chinese and cadaans have high IQ, hence why they have the most prosperous developed countries in the world. High IQ will take you far even when you don’t have the resources, low IQ will fail you even if you have abundance of resources, hence Africa.

Name a prosperous high iq country with no resources

 

[HiraanBorn]

Simple - it’s called high IQ. Both Chinese and cadaans have high IQ, hence why they have the most prosperous developed countries in the world. High IQ will take you far even when you don’t have the resources, low IQ will fail you even if you have abundance of resources, hence Africa.

Blaming Africa's problems solely on IQ is a bit ridiculous since IQ is not even a truly accurate measure of an individual's intellectual capabilities let alone an entire continental population.

 

[Amirah]

Blaming Africa's problems solely on IQ is a bit ridiculous since IQ is not even a truly accurate measure of an individual's intellectual capabilities let alone an entire continental population.

You know very well when I say IQ I’m talking about intelligence and not the actual IQ test. And yes Africans are less intelligent then Chinese, so don’t argue with me about something that’s pretty damn obvious smh

 

[Amirah]

Name a prosperous high iq country with no resources

You need to look no further than Europe. Most European countries have very few natural resources which was a major motivator for colonization. If you’re smart you’ll look elsewhere to get what you need and utilize what you have. Africa, esp sub-Saharan Africa has the highest concentration of natural resources in the world yet are the poorest and the least developed.... it defies logic really.

 

[celidheere]

You need to look no further then Europe. Most European countries have very few natural resources which was a major motivator for colonization. If you’re smart you’ll look elsewhere to get what you need and utilize what you have. Africa, esp sub-Saharan Africa has the highest concentration of natural resources in the world yet are the poorest and the least developed.... it defies logic really.

Europe developed because of a number of factors that you’re not taking into account. IQ is a factor but it’s a small one. Africa has had a way lower population density historically than Europe, so less contact within Africa. The Saharan desert blocked off a lot of trade between Africa and Eurasia and trade is a big reason why Europe and Asia developed quickly. The interior of Africa has had many diseases like sleeping sickness and malaria that make it difficult to sustain populations.

A lot of Africa is tropical so you also don’t have the concept of a winter season that makes it important to plan ahead for the future.

 

[menowaawaa]

Name a prosperous high iq country with no resources

south korea

 

[Leeban]

They country might be wealthy but most people lives are terrible, Turkic and Central Asian people have the highest quality life along with Arabs, they’re autonomous and have the choice of the want to join society and succeed or live in baadiya in their own terms

 

[Leeban]

Name a prosperous high iq country with no resources

UK and Greenland