We? Thats only you mate. Stop the coonery and be proud your somali african.I’m speaking about Darood and yes we are Arabs.
We? Thats only you mate. Stop the coonery and be proud your somali african.I’m speaking about Darood and yes we are Arabs.
but weren't the ifat and adalite sultans walashma and therefore darood?
My bro all respect to you but we are proud Arabs because our grandfather was Arab and our lineage will never change.We? Thats only you mate. Stop the coonery and be proud your somali african.
I’m speaking about Darood and yes we are Arabs.
Darood is the only tribe which has claimed Aqeeli lineage and there is proof for this such as Aqeeliyoon and Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani’s (who was a contemporary of Darood and his father Ismail) book where he mentions Darood’s father Ismail as a descendant of Aqeel.You know what's ironic about that, in the Yemeni Rasulid manuscripts would make clear that Ismail Ibrahim Al-Jabarti that the darood trace descent to was an ajami(non-arab) and the individuals who carried the Aqeeli lineages never claimed Arab either they claimed Al-Zayla'i and Al-Jabarti, they are also referred to as Ajami.
So i don't think it had much to do with claiming Arab cultural identity, as much as it had to with drawing one self closer to the religion.
Aqeeli lineage descent claim is also common for Dir, Raxanweyn and Hawiye. So it's a general Somali descent claim.
Darood is the only tribe which has claimed Aqeeli lineage and there is proof for this such as Aqeeliyoon and Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani’s (who was a contemporary of Darood and his father Ismail) book where he mentions Darood’s father Ismail as a descendant of Aqeel.
Warya you are a coon and we arent ayrabs.My bro all respect to you but we are proud Arabs because our grandfather was Arab and our lineage will never change.
So ismiak jabart was likely born in the early 1300s. But how do we have the darod sub clans like harti already in the 1500s mentioned in the 1500s. Does this mean that the somali geanolgies are actually very accurate.That's not true. Hawiye and Dir trace their ancestry to Aqil through Samaale, and Raxanweyn through Sab. So most Somali clans claim that descent.
Ismail Al-Jabarti is actually mentioned in rasulid manuscripts from that period. There was plenty of other individuals with Al-Jabarti and Al-Zaylai before him that claim that descent.
It was literally what Somali scholars became known for.
You don't even have to look at him being described as black ajami in the Suluk, ''Al-Jabarti'' makes it obvious he is from northern Somalia because Jabarta was the region of Zayla.
So it's not even something specific to the Awfat/Awdal Sultans, almost every Somali was claiming it at that time.
So ismiak jabart was likely born in the early 1300s. But how do we have the darod sub clans like harti already in the 1500s mentioned in the 1500s. Does this mean that the somali geanolgies are actually very accurate.
Warya you are a coon and we arent ayrabs.
What's confusing is why the geanolgies stop with him. What happened to the old clans.They all either existed but took on that descent claim to Ismail through marriage integration or new clans were formed out of older ones. You can tell by how many sub clans there are.
That's my guess.
That's not true. Hawiye and Dir trace their ancestry to Aqil through Samaale, and Raxanweyn through Sab. So most Somali clans claim that descent.
Ismail Al-Jabarti is actually mentioned in rasulid manuscripts from that period. There was plenty of other individuals with Al-Jabarti and Al-Zaylai before him that claim that descent.
It was literally what Somali scholars became known for.
You don't even have to look at him being described as black ajami in the Suluk, ''Al-Jabarti'' makes it obvious he is from northern Somalia because Jabarta was the region of Zayla.
So it's not even something specific to the Awfat/Awdal Sultans, almost every Somali was claiming it at that time.
Harla were the farmers on the fertile highlands while the Somalis were the nomads from the low lands. They are both the same ethnic group but with different occupations. No need to ascribe our history to ‘Ethio-Semites’ when you have one of the most authoritative ‘Ethio-Semite’ public historian of Ethiopia, former Minister of Education, Arts & Culture and Dean of the National Library and who is the Idajaa of the Amharic language and served as Selassies Education minister Takla Sadiq Mekuria compile a 1k long state sponsored monograph regarding the origin of the imam. In it he has constructed the lineage tree of the imam with the help of one of the most authoritative Muslim Harari scholar who has copies of the earliest history of Harar preceding Ifat.Harla were Ethio-Semitic speakers who probably lived in close proximity with Somalis and were genetically heavily Somali. They hated ethnic Somalis and had to be separated within the Imam’s army
As far as i know there is no authentic manuscript that ties Harari to Harla and the Futuh Mahdinat Harar and other manuscripts have been proven to be a fradulent writtings produced in 20th century.
They talk about fighting Italians and portuguese in 1200s and driving cars lmaao . It full of nonsense like that collapses modern day happenings into the past. They even mention people using rifles in the 13th century
Basically epic fiction pieces.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
What's confusing is why the geanolgies stop with him. What happened to the old clans.
Thete also must have been some massive event that causes this since I'd understand if it happened in the 700s as a part of the islamization process. But this began in the 1300s. 600 years after somalis had become Muslims
Samaale is just folkore and Hawiye and Dir don’t trace their ancestry to Aqeel, only Darood do. If Hawiye and Dir were Aqeelis how come we don’t have any Arab Manuscripts confirming their genealogy. Also forget about Manuscripts, majority of Hawiye don’t even share the same haplogroup most are a combination of different haplogroups.That's not true. Hawiye and Dir trace their ancestry to Aqil through Samaale, and Raxanweyn through Sab. So most Somali clans claim that descent.
Ismail Al-Jabarti is actually mentioned in rasulid manuscripts from that period. There was plenty of other individuals with Al-Jabarti and Al-Zaylai before him that claim that descent.
It was literally what Somali scholars became known for.
You don't even have to look at him being described as black ajami in the Suluk, ''Al-Jabarti'' makes it obvious he is from northern Somalia because Jabarta was the region of Zayla.
So it's not even something specific to the Awfat/Awdal Sultans, almost every Somali was claiming it at that time.
Ismail was born in 1322 and died in 1406. If you do the math 6 Generations after 125 years = 256 descendants have 4 children resulting in 1,024 descendants. Take into the consideration that Darood’s had multipe wife’s.So ismiak jabart was likely born in the early 1300s. But how do we have the darod sub clans like harti already in the 1500s mentioned in the 1500s. Does this mean that the somali geanolgies are actually very accurate.
Ismail was born in 1322 and died in 1406. If you do the math 6 Generations after 125 years = 256 descendants have 4 children resulting in 1,024 descendants. Take into the consideration that Darood’s had multipe wife’s.
Samaale is just folkore and Hawiye and Dir don’t trace their ancestry to Aqeel, only Darood do. If Hawiye and Dir were Aqeelis how come we don’t have any Arab Manuscripts confirming their genealogy. Also forget about Manuscripts, majority of Hawiye don’t even share the same haplogroup most are a combination of different haplogroups.
the kfat kingdom was Muslim habesha with Somalis and Afars and the Adal kingdom was Somali + afar and some Muslim habeshas