Bosaso proper is 5 kilometers in length and 3.5 kilometers wide it has an area of 15 kilometers. But there is a side settlement that is 1 kilometer length x 1 kilometer width also that is an area of 1 kilometer in area. So Bosaso is about 16 kilometers in area space. There is slightly IDP camps not worth counting to small and other scattered settlements near the farms and airport but it's not significant for a land area estimation.
Hargeisa is 6 kilometers length yet it's 7 kilometer in width. It has an area of 42 kilometers. There is not much difference in population between Hargeisa and Bosaso in real term population and I say that while Bosaso has a smaller land area then Hargeisa, but it is high density, they actually fill up their land area, where-as Hargeisa has many empty spaces in that 42 kilometer land area.
Then we must account for the fact of Bosaso being surrounded by many tuulos and hargeisa not a single tuulo outside of it, then there is the nomadic population to take into account and we know how massive bari land mass and it's pasture for nomadic population and it's massive. You can tell be the amount of wells, sand dams, and water catchments in a region to indicate how big their livestock population must be, you don't build such water infrastructure or have large quantities of it unless there is a large livestock in the area. The larger the livestock population the larger number of nomadic households because one or two families can't own 1 million livestock, it would be divided conservatively probably 30 livestock per household to generate a household count.
What's your views guys? Lets do real population estimates using a Dr formula, factors(water wells, livestock populations, households, land area, mathamatics) apply equations for households such as 5 per house-hold, apply comparisons against similar sized land area and household populations in the world which are census counted to see how accurate our estimations are. For example we can take Washington DC land area, find out its population and divide it up and see how many live in Washington in say Hargeisa land area of 42 kilometer and Bosaso land area of 15 kilometerto see the accuracy of our estimations, if we get similar figures in washington dc using somali city land masses, we know we getting close to reality.
That's how Majerten do stuff, not this nonsense of getting historical colonial records which are 1950 and all guess work because they never did a count nor provided the methodology, it's like somalispot guy just saying hargeisa a million when it's really 83k after mathamatics is applied to google earth.
Hargeisa is 6 kilometers length yet it's 7 kilometer in width. It has an area of 42 kilometers. There is not much difference in population between Hargeisa and Bosaso in real term population and I say that while Bosaso has a smaller land area then Hargeisa, but it is high density, they actually fill up their land area, where-as Hargeisa has many empty spaces in that 42 kilometer land area.
Then we must account for the fact of Bosaso being surrounded by many tuulos and hargeisa not a single tuulo outside of it, then there is the nomadic population to take into account and we know how massive bari land mass and it's pasture for nomadic population and it's massive. You can tell be the amount of wells, sand dams, and water catchments in a region to indicate how big their livestock population must be, you don't build such water infrastructure or have large quantities of it unless there is a large livestock in the area. The larger the livestock population the larger number of nomadic households because one or two families can't own 1 million livestock, it would be divided conservatively probably 30 livestock per household to generate a household count.
What's your views guys? Lets do real population estimates using a Dr formula, factors(water wells, livestock populations, households, land area, mathamatics) apply equations for households such as 5 per house-hold, apply comparisons against similar sized land area and household populations in the world which are census counted to see how accurate our estimations are. For example we can take Washington DC land area, find out its population and divide it up and see how many live in Washington in say Hargeisa land area of 42 kilometer and Bosaso land area of 15 kilometerto see the accuracy of our estimations, if we get similar figures in washington dc using somali city land masses, we know we getting close to reality.
That's how Majerten do stuff, not this nonsense of getting historical colonial records which are 1950 and all guess work because they never did a count nor provided the methodology, it's like somalispot guy just saying hargeisa a million when it's really 83k after mathamatics is applied to google earth.
Last edited: