Have an ajnabi tell them Somalis should return captured land and they'll be fuming
Have an ajnabi tell them Somalis should return captured land and they'll be fuming
Nonsense. How you got to that situation might be different, but the justification is exactly the same. You killed all the men in that society, and as a result ended up with owning slaves. They bought slaves. Now if they said 'oh they're so far away from home they're gonna die if don't enslave them', would you buy that justification? Yours is exactly the same because you're saying 'oh they're gonna die if we don't enslave them because we killed all their husbands/fathers'.Americans went and purchased slaves. Thats haram. Americans tortured them and raped them, also haram. Americans treated them like dogs. I don't condone any of that shit. We're talking about alternatives. Do you know any that I havent mentioned?
Nonsense. How you got to that situation might be different, but the justification is exactly the same. You killed all the men in that society, and as a result ended up with owning slaves. They bought slaves. Now if they said 'oh they're so far away from home they're gonna die if don't enslave them', would you buy that justification? Yours is exactly the same because you're saying 'oh they're gonna die if we don't enslave them because we killed all their husbands/fathers'.
I don't see your point. Are you trying to concede that their justification might actually be valid?The Africans were prisoners of war, but then sold by their African captors to whites.
You don't understand. They're not opposed to or concerned with slavery...at all, rather "treatment...of slaves"I don't see your point. Are you trying to concede that their justification might actually be valid?
I thought they might be emotionally blinded in defence of their religion, so that's why I used that analogy.You don't understand. They're not opposed to or concerned with slavery...at all, rather "treatment...of slaves"
Y'll need to be pragmatic and look at things objectively:I thought they might be emotionally blinded in defence of their religion, so that's why I used that analogy.
I didn't expect them to be nonchalant about slavery in general! Wow! I don't even know what to think now.
I thought they might be emotionally blinded in defence of their religion, so that's why I used that analogy.
I didn't expect them to be nonchalant about slavery in general! Wow! I don't even know what to think now.
If you were going to be objective about this, you would call spade a spade and see slavery as slavery. Now you're saying that Europeans gave slavery a bad name. I mean, really come on! Slavery is by definition an abhorrent act! There are no exceptions. For you guys to come here and try to say it that it's 'necessary' or words amounting to that is just mind-boggling.Y'll need to be pragmatic and look at things objectively:
Child labour (with harsh working conditions) is not the same as being the CEO of Apple, both are employment.If you were going to be objective about this, you would call spade a spade and see slavery as slavery. Now you're saying that Europeans gave slavery a bad name. I mean, really come on! Slavery is by definition an abhorrent act! There are no exceptions. For you guys to come here and try to say it that it's 'necessary' or words amounting to that is just mind boggling.
Huh?Child labour (with harsh working conditions) is not the same as being the CEO of Apple.
Let me rephrase that. Think of the shittiest possible job. Being the CEO of Apple > that job, though both are employment nonetheless.Huh?
Let me rephrase that. Think of the shittiest possible job. Being the CEO of Apple > that job, though both are employment nonetheless.
:siilaanyolaugh:
That was me trolling btwShit now you triggered my memory your the same guy that was arguing saying would you rather be gently raped or forcefully raped saying that the gentle rape is better something along that line, your that guy !
That was me trolling btw
Wallahi iyo billahi, magaci illahay I was trolling. The reactions were priceless. Don't you remember?Bullshit you were trolling you were adamant about it arguing time for it, arguing for gentle rape is trolling savage wildebeest I'll see my self out.
As I said, slavery is by definition an abhorrent immoral act. It doesn't matter whether you view slavery as some sort of a spectrum where some slaves have it better than others (since anything in life works like that). Any act that falls within this spectrum is by definition morally abhorrent.Let me rephrase that. Think of the shittiest possible job. Being the CEO of Apple > that job, though both are employment nonetheless.
But it's necessary if it's a result of war (PoW, slavery, whatever name you want to give it). It has been happening since the dawn of man. Like I said, welcome to the real world.As I said, slavery is by definition an abhorrent immoral act. It doesn't matter whether you view slavery as some sort of a spectrum where some slaves have it better than others (since anything in life works like that). Any act that falls within this spectrum is by definition morally abhorrent.
Your religion incorporated an abhorrent immoral act into its ethics and that's fine by you.But it's necessary if it's a result of war. It has been happening since the dawn of man. Like I said, welcome to the real world. Also Islam is the ONLY religion that institutionalizes the gradual emancipation of slaves. Only religion.