Wait doesn't he call a lot of people intellectual slaves? That seems to be his go to though?
Yeah, it’s his go-to insult.
Wait doesn't he call a lot of people intellectual slaves? That seems to be his go to though?
i can understand your line of reasoning. Clearly some points that could hold weight. He may very well be biased.I have talked extensively about this.
He’s a hypocrite for targeting Ilhan and not other Muslim politicians.
He’s a scam artist because he’s doing this to create traction that equals views and equals more money/attention. Hijab is a smart guy, he acts controversial and outspoken so people are drawn to his content which means more viewers and more money.
Disingenuous because he knows that Ilhan has to post these posts, just like every Muslim politician. The reason why he doesn’t target Sadiq Khan because it will divide the UK Muslim community and result in Sadiq losing his biggest support base. This will negatively impact Hijab as the London Muslim community will be weakened.
But since he’s disingenuous, instead of realising the impact of attacking a Muslim politician, he deliberately chooses to attack one that is in another continent and is already prone to controversy, so that:
A) It doesn’t affect him as Muslim Brit
B) He cannot be blamed for any weakened support for Ilhan as he can say that she was already controversial.
There is a reason why proper sheikhs like Mufti Menk, Omar Suleiman, Hamza Yusuf don’t get involved in controversy.
The idea of dawaah is more appealing to them than becoming an influencer.
Periplus is a liberal shill and is just making things up, baseless accusations to try to discredit a muslim in favour of his liberalism.i can understand your line of reasoning. Clearly some points that could hold weight. He may very well be biased.
I may not agree to the those labels though. We do not know what’s in his mind.
What I do know is he’s been a good influence on spreading Islam.
.
Periplus is a liberal shill and is just making things up, baseless accusations to try to discredit a muslim in favour of his liberalism.
i can understand your line of reasoning. Clearly some points that could hold weight. He may very well be biased.
I may not agree to the those labels though. We do not know what’s in his mind.
What I do know is he’s been a good influence on spreading Islam.