Don't forget the double dipping of flies if they drop into your drink. There's some weird medicinal advice in the hadith.
, but they cry when Idi Amin kicked them out of Africa 
I mean there is some modern science in support of this
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/34612/title/Insect-Wing-Kills-Bacteria/
All those points are dealt with by scholars of hadith and they still conclude that Bukhari needs to be revised to exclude many narrations that were formerly classed as authentic but which are not and which mislead people. See professor Israr Ahmed Khan's book Authenticating Hadith: Redefining The Criteria for one example. A good review here:Hadith have different ranking from Mutawatur(rigorously authentic), Sa7ee7(authrntic), hasan(good), da3eef(weak) to mawdoo3(fabricated). Then there's which part of the hadith was narrated by who, & if the narration is sound, but the chain is weak because one of the narrators is known to be forgetfull etc. It's a insanely deep science subhanAllah & people literally spend there lifetimes to have any clout in it. Just to give you an example of how intense hadith studies are, you traditionally couldn't memorize a hadith unless you learnt it from someone who had a chain of narrators going back to the prophet(saw). You'd then have to learn everyone in that chain, their life, characteristics etc. It's actually very intense alx the old generations did all the work
Some anti bacterial properties found on its wings does not mean you will be cured of whatever disease it carries. But by all means, try it. Dip flies into your food and water and see how that goes
Some more Hadith science for you
Eat dates and you won't be effected by poison, care to try this theory out?
I guess that article caught you off guard
Hadith like all speech contains specifics, generals, metaphors, literal, ambiguous. When the prophet saw said things, he didn't just say it. There were conversations taking place, or a precedent to his words. Unfortunately many people are dimwitted & read the hadith as if it's the only words the prophet saw uttered in his life, therefor no context. You're best to read the sharh of these ahadith bukhari they're written by ibn hajar al asaqalani. This hadith clearly has a context
That's a bit disingenuous. Tabari approached all his works with the same rigour. He took pains to include only what he believed was sound. He was not lenient at all. And yet he still made errors and mistakes. Both in his tafsir and in his approach to hadith. Which is to be expected. He was only human. No man made work is free of error. We should admit this and correct it, not deify theologians. No sheikh is above criticism.
No don't say you agree to disagree, just say you never looked at it from that perspective...which many ppl dont
The same applies with this hadith. What was going on, why is it only related to this specific situation. Ibn ishaq relates that these people were suffering from some type of endemic, was it specific organic medicine used to cure that endemic? What kind of camel was it, did the milk not have enough nutrients due to drought thus he ordered the mixing of urine which contains ph etc. Was the urine pure like that of a baby. What was it's relation to this sickness they had...ma fahantay?
Sxb If you claim to be critical about things, you should be critical enough to look at every angle which is what I do. Not many people know the background of this story & it's relation to an endemic the people were facing.
Lol dont know how you got that from what I wrote...nvm
Lol modern day medicine has worse things anyway (camel pee>fetal matter) but you wont see faan from him then.Lol dont know how you got that from what I wrote...nvm
So you think Muslim historians were not strict about authenticating stories about the previous Messengers of Allah such as Adam, Noah, Ibrahim, Sulayman, Yusuf, Musa, and Ciisa, but somehow, by magic, they managed to avoid errors about the last Messenger? Pretty illogical. Scholars would never write things about the deen unless they believed in it because Allah would hold them accountable for spreading falsehoods about his prophets. You make it sound as though history is different from hadith. Hadith books are history books too. They're about the past.
Their hadeeth are a load of crap. How can Iman Ali (ra) say that they shouldn’t marry the ‘Negroes’ because they are an ugly creation while some of his descendants married black females (according to their very own hadeeth)?
